Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Reported that the percentage of U.S. residents living in poverty was \(12.5 \%\) for men and \(15.1 \%\) for women. These percentages were estimates based on data from large representative samples of men and women. Suppose that the sample sizes were 1,200 for men and 1,000 for women. You would like to use the survey data to estimate the difference in the proportion living in poverty for men and women. (Hint: See Example 11.2) a. Answer the four key questions (QSTN) for this problem. What method would you consider based on the answers to these questions? b. Use the five-step process for estimation problems \(\left(\mathrm{EMC}^{3}\right)\) to calculate and interpret a \(90 \%\) large- sample confidence interval for the difference in the proportion living in poverty for men and women.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The estimated difference in poverty proportions between men and women ranges from -0.004 to 0.056, according to a 90% confidence interval.

Step by step solution

01

- Answer the QSTN questions

The QSTN questions in statistics are: Quantity? Source of data? Target population? Nature of result? The Quantity is the difference in proportions of poverty between men and women. The Source of data comes from large representative samples of men and women. The Target population is all U.S. residents. The Nature of result is an estimation problem where you are asked to estimate a numerical parameter.
02

- Identify method

Based on these answers, use a method to compare two independent proportions, since the estimates are based on two separate samples of men and women.
03

- Use EMC^3 for estimation problems

The EMC^3 formula stands for Estimate, Margin (of error), Confidence (level), Cutoff, Criteria. The Estimate is the difference in sample proportions i.e. \(0.151 - 0.125 = 0.026\). The Margin of error can be calculated using the formula for standard error for difference between proportions: \(\sqrt{(p1 (1-p1) / n1) + (p2 (1-p2) / n2)} = \sqrt{(0.151 × 0.849 / 1000) + (0.125 × 0.875 / 1200)} ≈ 0.018\). For the Confidence level of 90%, use the critical z value of 1.645. The Cutoff is calculated by multiplying the critical z value with the Margin of error: \(1.645 × 0.018 ≈ 0.030\). For Criteria, refer to standard conditions for inference for difference in proportions. Check if the samples are random, if they are large enough, and if the populations are at least 10 times as large as the samples.
04

- Calculate and interpret confidence interval

The 90% confidence interval for the difference in proportions is: \(Estimate ± Cutoff = 0.026 ± 0.030\). This interval ranges from -0.004 to 0.056. This means that we are 90% confident that the true difference in the proportion of poverty between men and women in the U.S. falls between -0.004 and 0.056.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The authors of the paper "Adolescents and MP3 Players: Too Many Risks, Too Few Precautions" (Pediatrics [2009]:e953-e958) concluded that more boys than girls listen to music at high volumes. This conclusion was based on data from independent random samples of 764 Dutch boys and 748 Dutch girls ages 12 to \(19 .\) Of the boys, 397 reported that they almost always listen to music at a high volume setting. Of the girls, 331 reported listening to music at a high volume setting. Do the sample data support the authors' conclusion that the proportion of Dutch boys who listen to music at high volume is greater than this proportion for Dutch girls? Test the relevant hypotheses using a 0.01 significance level.

"Mountain Biking May Reduce Fertility in Men, Study Says" was the headline of an article appearing in the San Luis Obispo Tribune (December 3,2002 ). This conclusion was based on an Austrian study that compared sperm counts of avid mountain bikers (those who ride at least 12 hours per week) and nonbikers. Ninety percent of the avid mountain bikers studied had low sperm count, compared to \(26 \%\) of the nonbikers. Suppose that these percentages were based on independent samples of 100 avid mountain bikers and 100 nonbikers and that these samples are representative of avid mountain bikers and nonbikers. a. Using a confidence level of \(95 \%,\) estimate the difference between the proportion of avid mountain bikers with low sperm count and the proportion for nonbikers. b. Is it reasonable to conclude that mountain biking 12 hours per week or more causes low sperm count? Explain.

Common Sense Media surveyed 1,000 teens and 1,000 parents of teens to learn about how teens are using social networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace ("Teens Show, Tell Too Much Online," San Francisco Chronicle, August 10,2009 ). The two samples were independently selected and were chosen to be representative of American teens and parents of American teens. When asked if they check online social networking sites more than 10 times a day, 220 of the teens surveyed said yes. When parents of teens were asked if their teen checked networking sites more than 10 times a day, 40 said yes. Use a significance level of 0.01 to determine if there is convincing evidence that the proportion of all parents who think their teen checks social networking sites more than 10 times a day is less than the proportion of all teens who check more than 10 times a day.

The news release referenced in the previous exercise also included data from independent samples of teenage drivers and parents of teenage drivers. In response to a question asking if they approved of laws banning the use of cell phones and texting while driving, \(74 \%\) of the teens surveyed and \(95 \%\) of the parents surveyed said they approved. The sample sizes were not given in the news release, but suppose that 600 teens and 400 parents of teens were surveyed and that these samples are representative of the two populations. Do the data provide convincing evidence that the proportion of teens who approve of banning cell phone and texting while driving is less than the proportion of parents of teens who approve? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(0.05 .\)

The report "Audience Insights: Communicating to Teens (Aged \(12-17)^{\prime \prime}\) (www.cdc.gov, 2009 ) described teens' attitudes about traditional media, such as TV, movies, and newspapers. In a representative sample of American teenage girls, \(41 \%\) said newspapers were boring. In a representative sample of American teenage boys, \(44 \%\) said newspapers were boring. Sample sizes were not given in the report. a. Suppose that the percentages reported were based on samples of 58 girls and 41 boys. Is there convincing evidence that the proportion of those who think that newspapers are boring is different for teenage girls and boys? Carry out a hypothesis test using \(\alpha=.05\). b. Suppose that the percentages reported were based on samples of 2,000 girls and 2,500 boys. Is there convincing evidence that the proportion of those who think that newspapers are boring is different for teenage girls and boys? Carry out a hypothesis test using \(\alpha=0.05\). c. Explain why the hypothesis tests in Parts (a) and resulted in different conclusions.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free