Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Past experience is that when individuals are approached with a request to fill out and return a particular questionnaire in a provided stamped and addressed envelope, the response rate is \(40 \%\). An investigator believes that if the person distributing the questionnaire were stigmatized in some obvious way, potential respondents would feel sorry for the distributor and thus tend to respond at a rate higher than \(40 \%\). To test this theory, a distributor wore an eye patch. Of the 200 questionnaires distributed by this individual, 109 were returned. Does this provide evidence that the response rate in this situation is greater than the previous rate of \(40 \%\) ? State and test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance plevel of 0.05 .

Short Answer

Expert verified
The result of the test provides strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the response rate is indeed higher when the distributor wears an eye patch, at a significance level of 0.05.

Step by step solution

01

Set Up the Hypotheses

The null hypothesis (H0) states that the response rate does not change, i.e., the response rate is equal to 40%. The alternative hypothesis (H1) states that the response rate is higher than 40% with an eye patch.\[ H0: p = 0.4 \]\[ H1: p > 0.4 \]
02

Calculate the Test Statistic

The test statistic for a hypothesis test about a proportion is a z-score (z). \[ z = \frac{(p_1 - p_o) }{\sqrt{\frac{(p_o(1 - p_o))}{n}}\] which equals to \[ z = \frac{(0.545 - 0.4) }{\sqrt{\frac{(0.4(1 - 0.4))}{200}}\] After calculating, the z-score is approximately 4.36.
03

Determine the P-value

The P-value is the probability that a z-score is more than the absolute value of the test statistic, considering the null hypothesis is true. For this two-sided test, the P-value is the area to the right of our test statistic (z = 4.36). Using standard statistical software or Z-tables, the P-value is approximately 0.00001.
04

Make the Decision

Compare the P-value to the significance level and make the decision about the null hypothesis. The P-value is less than the significance level of 0.05, so the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.
05

Draw a Conclusion

Given the result of the test, there is enough evidence to support the claim that the response rate is greater than 40% when the distributor wears an eye patch.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "The Benefits of Facebook Friends: Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites" (Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication [2007]: \(1143-1168\) ) describes a study of \(n=286\) undergraduate students at Michigan State University. Suppose that it is reasonable to regard this sample as a random sample of undergraduates at Michigan State. You want to use the survey data to decide if there is evidence that more than \(75 \%\) of the students at this university have a Facebook page that includes a photo of themselves. Let \(p\) denote the proportion of all Michigan State undergraduates who have such a page. (Hint: See Example 10.10\()\) a. Describe the shape, center, and spread of the sampling distribution of \(\hat{p}\) for random samples of size 286 if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.75\) is true. b. Would you be surprised to observe a sample proportion as large as \(\hat{p}=0.83\) for a sample of size 286 if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.75\) were true? Explain why or why not. c. Would you be surprised to observe a sample proportion as large as \(\hat{p}=0.79\) for a sample of size 286 if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.75\) were true? Explain why or why not. d. The actual sample proportion observed in the study was \(\hat{p}=0.80 .\) Based on this sample proportion, is there convincing evidence that the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=\) 0.75 is not true, or is \(\hat{p}\) consistent with what you would expect to see when the null hypothesis is true? Support your answer with a probability calculation.

A television station has been providing live coverage of a sensational criminal trial. The station's program director wants to know if more than half of potential viewers prefer a return to regular daytime programming. A survey of randomly selected viewers is conducted. With \(p\) representing the proportion of all viewers who prefer regular daytime programming, what hypotheses should the program director test?

In a survey of 1,005 adult Americans, \(46 \%\) indicated that they were somewhat interested or very interested in having Web access in their cars (USA Today, May 1,2009 ). Suppose that the marketing manager of a car manufacturer claims that the \(46 \%\) is based only on a sample and that \(46 \%\) is close to half, so there is no reason to believe that the proportion of all adult Americans who want car Web access is less than \(0.50 .\) Is the marketing manager correct in his claim? Provide statistical evidence to support your answer. For purposes of this exercise, assume that the sample can be considered representative ofp adult Americans.

Explain why the statement \(\hat{p}>0.50\) is not a legitimate hypothesis.

A television manufacturer states that at least \(90 \%\) of its TV sets will not need service during the first 3 years of operation. A consumer group wants to investigate this statement. A random sample of \(n=100\) purchasers is selected and each person is asked if the set purchased needed repair during the first 3 years. Let \(p\) denote the proportion of all sets made by this manufacturer that will not need service in the first 3 years. The consumer group does not want to claim false advertising unless there is strong evidence that \(p<0.9\). The appropriate hypotheses are then \(H_{0}: p=0.9\) versus \(H_{a}: p<0.9\). a. In the context of this problem, describe Type I and Type II errors, and discuss the possible consequences of each. b. Would you recommend a test procedure that uses \(\alpha=\) 0.01 or one that uses \(\alpha=0.10 ?\) Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free