Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In a representative sample of 2,013 American adults, 1,590 indicated that lack of respect and courtesy in American society is a serious problem (Associated Press, April 3,2002 ). Is there convincing evidence that more than three- quarters of American adults believe that lack of respect and courtesy is a serious problem? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of 0.05 .

Short Answer

Expert verified
The answer will depend on the calculated p-value compared with the significance level 0.05. If the P-value is less than 0.05, one can conclude there is convincing evidence that more than 75% of American adults believe lack of respect and courtesy is a serious problem.

Step by step solution

01

Formulating the Hypotheses

The null hypothesis \(H_0\) would assume that the proportion p (representing the American adults who believe lack of respect and courtesy is a problem) is equal to 0.75 (75%). The alternative hypothesis \(H_1\) would propose that the proportion is greater than 0.75. Formally, this can be represented as: \(H_0:p=0.75\) and \(H_1:p>0.75\).
02

Performing the Z-test

We need to calculate the test statistic which is a Z-score in this case. The formula is \(Z = \frac {(\hat{p} - p_{0})}{\sqrt{\frac{p_{0}*(1-p_{0})}{n}}}\). Here, \( \hat{p}\) is the sample proportion, \(p_0\) is the proportion in the null hypothesis, and n is the sample size. The sample proportion \(\hat{p}\) = 1590/2013 ≈ 0.79. Substituting these values into the formula, we can calculate the Z-score.
03

Calculating the P-value

The P-value represents the probability of observing a sample statistic as extreme as the test statistic. Since the claim is that more than three-quarters of the population have noticed the problem, this is a right-tailed test. To determine the P-value, we need to find the probability that a Z-score is greater than the calculated test statistic under the standard normal distribution.
04

Comparing the P-value with the Significance Level

The null hypothesis is rejected if the P-value is less than the significance level. The significance level is given as 0.05. If the calculated P-value is less than the significance level, we can conclude there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and support that more than three-quarters of American adults believe that lack of respect and courtesy is a serious problem.
05

Conclusion

Based on the P-value and the significance level, we conclude whether or not there is convincing evidence that more than 75% of American adults believe lack of respect and courtesy is a serious problem.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null and Alternative Hypotheses in Hypothesis Testing
Understanding the null and alternative hypotheses is the foundation of hypothesis testing in statistics. The null hypothesis (\( H_0 \) is a statement of no effect or no difference and serves as a default or starting assumption. In context of the provided example, the null hypothesis posits that the proportion of American adults who believe lack of respect and courtesy is a serious problem is equal to 75% (\( p = 0.75 \)).

The alternative hypothesis (\( H_1 \) contradicts the null hypothesis. It is what the researcher aims to prove, and in our example, it posits that the proportion is greater than 75% (\( p > 0.75 \)). This formulation is crucial as it defines the direction of the testing and what evidence is required to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis.

A well-formulated null and alternative hypothesis sets the stage for meaningful analysis. Without a clearly defined null and alternative hypothesis, the rest of the hypothesis testing process does not hold much significance.
Z-test Statistic Calculation
Calculating the Z-test statistic is an integral step in determining if the sample data provides sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis. The Z-test is specifically used when comparing a sample proportion to a known population proportion, assuming the sample size is large enough for the central limit theorem to apply.

The formula for the Z-test statistic is given by: \( Z = \frac {(\hat{p} - p_{0})}{{\sqrt{\frac{p_{0}*(1-p_{0})}{n}}}} \). Here, \( \hat{p} \) is the sample proportion, \( p_0 \) is the hypothesized population proportion, and \( n \) is the sample size. The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the sample proportion is away from the hypothesized population proportion.

In our exercise, by inputting the values into this formula, we obtain a Z-score that quantifies the discrepancy between the observed data and the null hypothesis. A higher Z-score indicates that the observed sample proportion is much higher than the expected under the null hypothesis, suggesting stronger evidence against it.
P-value Significance
The P-value is a vital concept in hypothesis testing and measures the strength of the evidence against the null hypothesis. It quantifies the probability of obtaining a sample statistic as extreme as the one observed (or more extreme), assuming that the null hypothesis is true.

For a given significance level (\( \alpha \) the P-value allows us to make a decision regarding the null hypothesis. If the P-value is less than \( \alpha \) we reject the null hypothesis, concluding that our sample provides sufficient evidence to support the alternative hypothesis. In our example, the significance level is 0.05. If the computed P-value based on the Z-score is below this threshold, it implicates that there's statistically significant evidence to suggest that more than three-quarters of American adults view the lack of respect and courtesy as a serious problem.

The interpretation of the P-value is pivotal in drawing conclusions: a small P-value indicates that our observed result would be very unlikely under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true, paving the way to support the alternative hypothesis with statistical evidence.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In a survey of 1,000 women ages 22 to 35 who work full-time, 540 indicated that they would be willing to give up some personal time in order to make more money (USA Today, March 4, 2010). The sample was selected to be representative of women in the targeted age group. a. Do the sample data provide convincing evidence that a majority of women ages 22 to 35 who work fulltime would be willing to give up some personal time for more money? Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=0.01\) b. Would it be reasonable to generalize the conclusion from Part (a) to all working women? Explain why or why not.

Let \(p\) denote the proportion of students living on campus at a large university who plan to move off campus in the next academic year. For a large sample \(z\) test of \(H_{0}: p=0.70\) versus \(H_{\mathrm{a}}: p>0.70,\) find the \(P\) -value associated with each of the following values of the \(z\) test statistic. a. 1.40 b. 0.92 c. 1.85 d. 2.18 e. -1.40

In an AP-AOL sports poll (Associated Press, December 18 , 2005), 272 of 394 randomly selected baseball fans stated that they thought the designated hitter rule should either be expanded to both baseball leagues or eliminated. Based on the given information, is there sufficient evidence to conclude that a majority of baseball fans feel this way?

Use the definition of the \(P\) -value to explain the following: a. Why \(H_{0}\) would be rejected if \(P\) -value \(=0.0003\) b. Why \(H_{0}\) would not be rejected if \(P\) -value \(=0.350\)

The National Cancer Institute conducted a 2-year study to determine whether cancer death rates for areas near nuclear power plants are higher than for areas without nuclear facilities (San Luis Obispo Telegram-Tribune, September 17,1990 ). A spokesperson for the Cancer Institute said, "From the data at hand, there was no convincing evidence of any increased risk of death from any of the cancers surveyed due to living near nuclear facilities. However, no study can prove the absence of an effect." a. Suppose \(p\) denotes the true proportion of the population in areas near nuclear power plants who die of cancer during a given year. The researchers at the Cancer Institute might have considered two rival hypotheses of the form \(H_{0}: p\) is equal to the corresponding value for areas without nuclear facilities \(H_{a}: p\) is greater than the corresponding value for areas without nuclear facilities Did the researchers reject \(H_{0}\) or fail to reject \(H_{0} ?\) b. If the Cancer Institute researchers are incorrect in their conclusion that there is no evidence of increased risk of death from cancer associated with living near a nuclear power plant, are they making a Type I or a Type II error? Explain. c. Comment on the spokesperson's last statement that no study can prove the absence of an effect. Do you agree with this statement?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free