Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The paper referenced in the previous exercise also reported that when each of the 1,178 students who participated in the study was asked if he or she played video games at least once a day, 271 responded yes. The researchers were interested in using this information to decide if there is convincing evidence that more than \(20 \%\) of students ages 8 to 18 play video games at least once a day.

Short Answer

Expert verified
There is convincing evidence to suggest that more than 20% of students ages 8 to 18 play video games at least once a day.

Step by step solution

01

Define the Hypotheses

The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) is that the proportion of students who play video games at least once a day is equal to 20% (or 0.2). The alternative hypothesis (\(H_1\)) is that the proportion of students who play video games at least once a day is greater than 20% (or 0.2). Mathematically, this can be expressed as follows: \(H_0: p = 0.2\), \(H_1: p > 0.2\)
02

Perform Calculations

Now, calculate the sample proportion (\(p̂\)) by dividing the number of 'yes' responses by the total number of students. \(p̂ = 271/1178 = 0.23\). To conduct the hypothesis test, we need to calculate the test statistic (z) which is given by \(z = (p̂ - p)/(sqrt((p * (1 - p))/n))\) where \(p\) is the proportion under null hypothesis, \(p̂\) is the sample proportion and \(n\) is the sample size. Substituting the given values, we get \(z = (0.23 - 0.2) / (sqrt((0.2 * (1 - 0.2))/1178)) \approx 2.6\).
03

Interpret the Result

The z-score tells us how many standard deviations away our sample proportion is from the null hypothesis proportion. The z-value obtained is 2.6 which is quite significantly larger than 1.96 (the critical z-value for a 5% level of significance for a one-tailed test). Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is convincing evidence that more than 20% of students ages 8 to 18 play video games at least once a day.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A county commissioner must vote on a resolution that would commit substantial resources to the construction of a sewer in an outlying residential area. Her fiscal decisions have been criticized in the past, so she decides to take a survey of residents in her district to find out if they favor spending money for a sewer system. She will vote to appropriate funds only if she can be reasonably sure that a majority of the people in her district favor the measure. What hypotheses should she test?

Step 2 of the five-step process for hypothesis testing is selecting an appropriate method. What is involved in completing this step?

In a hypothesis test, what does it mean to say that the null hypothesis was rejected?

Do state laws that allow private citizens to carry concealed weapons result in a reduced crime rate? The author of a study carried out by the Brookings Institution is reported as saying, "The strongest thing I could say is that I don't see any strong evidence that they are reducing crime" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, January 23,2003 ). a. Is this conclusion consistent with testing \(H_{0}:\) concealed weapons laws reduce crime versus \(H_{a}:\) concealed weapons laws do not reduce crime or with testing \(H_{0}:\) concealed weapons laws do not reduce crime versus \(H_{a}:\) concealed weapons laws reduce crime Explain. b. Does the stated conclusion indicate that the null hypothesis was rejected or not rejected? Explain.

For which of the following combinations of \(P\) -value and significance level would the null hypothesis be rejected? a. \(P\) -value \(=0.426 \quad \alpha=0.05\) b. \(P\) -value \(=0.033 \quad \alpha=0.01\) c. \(P\) -value \(=0.046 \quad \alpha=0.10\) d. \(P\) -value \(=0.026 \quad \alpha=0.05\) e. \(P\) -value \(=0.004 \quad \alpha=0.01\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free