Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Explain why a \(P\) -value of 0.0002 would be interpreted as strong evidence against the null hypothesis.

Short Answer

Expert verified
A P-value of 0.0002 is much lower than the commonly used threshold or significance level of 0.05. A small P-value (typically ≤ 0.05) indicates strong evidence against the null hypothesis, so we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, a P-value of 0.0002 would be interpreted as strong evidence against the null hypothesis.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Null Hypothesis

The null hypothesis, denoted usually by \( H_0 \), is a statement about a population parameter that we compare our results against. Essentially, it assumes that there is no effect or difference in the population.
02

Defining the P-value

The P-value is a measure of the probability that an observed difference could have occurred just by random chance. In other words, it is the probability of obtaining a result as extreme, or more so, than what was actually observed if the null hypothesis were true. It is calculated using the observed data.
03

Understanding Statistical Significance

Statistical significance is a decision about the null hypothesis. If the data provide sufficient evidence against the null hypothesis, we reject the null hypothesis. The level of evidence required to reject the null hypothesis is defined by the significance level, often denoted by \( \alpha \) (alpha). A commonly used alpha level is 0.05 or 5%, which means that the evidence must suggest that the event would occur 5% or less of the time under the null hypothesis.
04

Interpreting the P-value of 0.0002

In our case, the P-value is 0.0002, which is well below the typical \( \alpha \) level of 0.05. A small P-value (typically ≤ 0.05) indicates strong evidence against the null hypothesis, so you reject the null hypothesis. This low P-value is thus seen as strong evidence against the null hypothesis because it suggests that the likelihood of the observed result, given that the null hypothesis is true, is exceedingly small. Thus, we would reject the null hypothesis and suggest that there is an effect or difference.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
In the realm of probability and statistics, the null hypothesis (\( H_0 \) serves as the default assumption—meaning it postulates no significant effect or relationship between variables.

Think of it as the skeptical scientist's baseline, where any observed results in a study are presumed to be the product of chance rather than a meaningful phenomenon. For example, if we were testing whether a new drug is more effective than a placebo, the null hypothesis would state that there is no difference in effect between the two.

It's crucial to highlight that the null hypothesis is never proven; it is either not rejected or rejected in favor of an alternative hypothesis, based on the evidence.
Statistical Significance
The term 'statistical significance' is a cornerstone in hypothesis testing. It helps researchers determine if their findings are due to a specific factor or merely random chance.

For a result to be considered statistically significant, it must be unlikely to have occurred if the null hypothesis were true. This is where the significance level, denoted as \( \alpha \), comes into play. A common \( \alpha \) is 0.05, creating a 5% threshold. If our P-value falls below this threshold, we have reason to believe our findings are not just random occurrences.

In essence, surpassing the barrier of statistical significance is akin to saying, 'There is less than a 5% probability that these results are a fluke if the null hypothesis were correct.'
Rejecting the Null Hypothesis
Rejecting the null hypothesis is essentially the aim of many statistical tests. When researchers observe a P-value that is lower than the predetermined significance level (\( \alpha \)), it suggests strong evidence against the null hypothesis.

In our example, the P-value of 0.0002 signifies an extremely small chance that the observed results were due simply to random variation—hence giving us the green light to reject the null hypothesis. It's not a statement of absolute 'proof' against \( H_0 \)—statistical testing is about probabilities, after all—but it is a strong indication that there may be a significant effect or difference worth further exploration.
Probability and Statistics
The foundation of hypothesis testing lies in probability and statistics. These disciplines allow us to make informed decisions about the likelihood of various outcomes.

Understanding P-values, significance levels, and the concepts of null and alternative hypotheses are all instrumental in interpreting data scientifically. Probability provides the language and tools for quantifying the uncertainty of events, while statistics offers methodologies for data collection, analysis, and interpretation in the face of this uncertainty.

Together, they empower researchers to draw conclusions from data, distinguish between random noise and genuine signals, and ultimately advance human knowledge through rigorous scientific inquiry.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In a hypothesis test, what does it mean to say that the null hypothesis was rejected?

Researchers at the University of Washington and Harvard University analyzed records of breast cancer screening and diagnostic evaluations ("Mammogram Cancer Scares More Frequent Than Thought," USA Today, April 16,1998\()\). Discussing the benefits and downsides of the screening process, the article states that although the rate of falsepositives is higher than previously thought, if radiologists were less aggressive in following up on suspicious tests, the rate of false-positives would fall, but the rate of missed cancers would rise. Suppose that such a screening test is used to decide between a null hypothesis of \(H_{0}:\) no cancer is present and an alternative hypothesis of \(H_{a}:\) cancer is present. (Although these are not hypotheses about a population characteristic, this exercise illustrates the definitions of Type I and Type II errors.) a. Would a false-positive (thinking that cancer is present when in fact it is not) be a Type I error or a Type II error? b. Describe a Type I error in the context of this problem, and discuss the consequences of making a Type I error. c. Describe a Type II error in the context of this problem, and discuss the consequences of making a Type II error. d. Recall the statement in the article that if radiologists were less aggressive in following up on suspicious tests, the rate of false-positives would fall but the rate of missed cancers would rise. What aspect of the relationship between the probability of a Type I error and the probability of a Type II error is being described here?

The article "Breast-Feeding Rates Up Early" (USA Today, Sept. 14,2010 ) summarizes a survey of mothers whose babies were born in \(2009 .\) The Center for Disease Control sets goals for the proportion of mothers who will still be breast-feeding their babies at various ages. The goal for 12 months after birth is 0.25 or more. Suppose that the survey used a random sample of 1,200 mothers and that you want to use the survey data to decide if there is evidence that the goal is not being met. Let \(p\) denote the proportion of all mothers of babies born in 2009 who were still breast-feeding at 12 months. (Hint: See Example 10.10 ) a. Describe the shape, center, and spread of the sampling distribution of \(\hat{p}\) for random samples of size 1,200 if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.25\) is true. b. Would you be surprised to observe a sample proportion as small as \(\hat{p}=0.24\) for a sample of size 1,200 if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.25\) were true? Explain why or why not. c. Would you be surprised to observe a sample proportion as small as \(\hat{p}=0.20\) for a sample of size 1,200 if the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.25\) were true? Explain why or why not. d. The actual sample proportion observed in the study was \(\hat{p}=0.22 .\) Based on this sample proportion, is there convincing evidence that the goal is not being met, or is the observed sample proportion consistent with what you would expect to see when the null hypothesis is true? Support your answer with a probability calculation.

Step 2 of the five-step process for hypothesis testing is selecting an appropriate method. What is involved in completing this step?

InasurveyconductedbyCareerBuilders.com,employers were asked if they had ever sent an employee home because he or she was dressed inappropriately (June \(17,2008,\) www .careerbuilders.com). A total of 2,765 employers responded to the survey, with 968 saying that they had sent an employee home for inappropriate attire. In a press release, CareerBuilder makes the claim that more than one-third of employers have sent an employee home to change clothes. Do the sample data provide convincing evidence in support of this claim? Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=\) 0.05 . For purposes of this exercise, assume that the sample is representative of employers in the United States.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free