Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

According to a survey of 1,000 adult Americans conducted by Opinion Research Corporation, 210 of those surveyed said playing the lottery would be the most practical way for them to accumulate \(\$ 200,000\) in net wealth in their lifetime ("One in Five Believe Path to Riches Is the Lottery," San Luis Obispo Tribune, January 11,2006 ). Although the article does not describe how the sample was selected, for purposes of this exercise, assume that the sample is a random sample of adult Americans. Suppose that you want to use the data from this survey to decide if there is convincing evidence that more than \(20 \%\) of adult Americans believe that playing the lottery is the best strategy for accumulating \(\$ 200,000\) in net wealth. a. What hypotheses should be tested in order to answer this question? b. The \(P\) -value for this test is 0.215 . What conclusion would you reach if \(\alpha=0.05 ?\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The hypotheses are \(H_0: p = 0.20\) and \(H_A: p > 0.20\).\nb. Given that the p-value is greater than the level of significance (\(\alpha\)), we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, there's not enough evidence to conclude that more than 20% of adult Americans believe that playing the lottery is the best strategy to accumulate $200,000 in net wealth.

Step by step solution

01

Formulate Hypotheses

Hypotheses are statements about population parameters that we want to test. In this case, the null hypothesis \((H_0)\) assumes no change from the status quo (20%). The alternative hypothesis \((H_A)\) reflects the change we're interested in – in this case, more than 20% believing that playing the lottery is the best wealth accumulation strategy. So, \n\n\(H_0: p = 0.20\)\n\(H_A: p > 0.20\) \n\nWhere \(p\) is the proportion of adult Americans who believe that playing the lottery is the best strategy for accumulating $200,000 in net wealth.
02

Determine the Level of Significance

The level of significance or alpha (\(\alpha\)), which is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true, is given as 0.05.
03

Comparing P-Value with Level of Significance

In hypothesis testing, we reject the null hypothesis \(H_0\) if the p-value is less than or equal to the level of significance \(\alpha\). In this case, we compare the p-value (0.215) with \(\alpha\) (0.05) and since 0.215 > 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Many people have misconceptions about how profitable small, consistent investments can be. In a survey of 1,010 randomly selected American adults (Associated Press, October 29,1999 ), only 374 responded that they thought that an investment of \(\$ 25\) per week over 40 years with a \(7 \%\) annual return would result in a sum of over \(\$ 100,000\) (the actual amount would be \(\$ 286,640\) ). Is there convincing evidence that less than \(40 \%\) of U.S. adults think that such an investment would result in a sum of over \(\$ 100,000\) ? Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=0.05\).

The paper "College Students' Social Networking Experiences on Facebook" (Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology [2009]: 227-238) summarized a study in which 92 students at a private university were asked how much time they spent on Facebook on a typical weekday. The researchers were interested in estimating the average time spent on Facebook by students at this university.

A television manufacturer states that at least \(90 \%\) of its TV sets will not need service during the first 3 years of operation. A consumer group wants to investigate this statement. A random sample of \(n=100\) purchasers is selected and each person is asked if the set purchased needed repair during the first 3 years. Let \(p\) denote the proportion of all sets made by this manufacturer that will not need service in the first 3 years. The consumer group does not want to claim false advertising unless there is strong evidence that \(p<0.9\). The appropriate hypotheses are then \(H_{0}: p=0.9\) versus \(H_{a}: p<0.9\). a. In the context of this problem, describe Type I and Type II errors, and discuss the possible consequences of each. b. Would you recommend a test procedure that uses \(\alpha=\) 0.01 or one that uses \(\alpha=0.10 ?\) Explain.

A survey of 1,000 adult Americans ("Military Draft Study," AP-Ipsos, June 2005 ) included the following question: "If the military draft were reinstated, would you favor or oppose drafting women as well as men?" Forty-three percent responded that they would favor drafting women if the draft were reinstated. Using the five-step process for hypothesis testing \(\left(\mathrm{HMC}^{3}\right)\) and a 0.05 significance level, determine if there is convincing evidence that less than half of adult Americansp favor drafting women.

Give an example of a situation where you would not want to select a very small significance level.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free