Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

According to the article "Rubbing Hands Together Under Warm Air Dryers Can Counteract Bacteria Reduction" (Infectious Disease News, September 22,2010 ), washing your hands isn't enough-good "hand hygiene" also includes drying hands thoroughly. The article described an experiment to compare bacteria reduction for three different hand-drying methods. In this experiment, subjects handled uncooked chicken for 45 seconds, then washed their hands with a single squirt of soap for 60 seconds, and then used one of the three hand-drying methods. The bacteria count on their hands was then measured. Suppose you want to carry out a similar experiment with 30 subjects who are willing to participate. Describe a method for randomly assigning each of the 30 subjects to one of the hand-drying methods.

Short Answer

Expert verified
First, 30 unique labels are created, each representing a subject in the experiment. These labels are thoroughly mixed in a container to ensure randomness. Hand-drying methods are then assigned to subjects by drawing one label at a time and assigning that subject to a method. This is repeated until all labels are drawn, resulting in each method being tested on 10 subjects. This method ensures the randomness and absence of bias in the assignment of subjects.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Scenario

The experiment consists of 30 subjects and 3 hand-drying methods. So, each method is to be tested on an equal number of subjects. The total number of subjects 30 is evenly divisible by the number of groups 3 (i.e., 30/3 = 10). Thus, each hand-drying method will be tested on 10 subjects.
02

Prepare Subject Labels

Create 30 identical labels, each representing a subject in the experiment. Each label will have a unique subject identifier.
03

Randomize Subject Assignments

Put all the 30 labels in a container and shuffle them to randomize their order. Then, draw a label one by one for each hand-drying method. Repeat this process until there are no labels left in the container.
04

Assure Randomness

Following this method, every subject has an equal chance of being assigned to each of the hand-drying methods as the process is devoid of bias, satisfying the condition for randomness.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Randomized Experiment
A randomized experiment is a cornerstone of statistical research used to infer causality between treatment and outcome. Imagine you are conducting a study to understand the effectiveness of different hand-drying methods in reducing bacterial count. To ensure that the results of the study are reliable, it is crucial to assign subjects to hand-drying methods randomly. This process helps to eliminate selection bias and confounding variables that could skew the results.

For the experiment described, where 30 subjects are divided evenly among three hand-drying methods, randomization could be achieved by assigning each subject a number from 1 to 30. These numbered labels are placed into a container and mixed thoroughly. You would then draw labels without looking to assign 10 subjects to each method. This random allocation is essential because it balances out other variables that might affect hand hygiene, such as age, gender, or prior exposure to bacteria, ensuring that the comparison between hand-drying methods is fair and scientifically valid.
Bacteria Reduction in Hand-Drying Methods
Hand-drying is an integral part of hand hygiene. After washing, hands may still carry bacteria that can be further reduced through effective drying. There are various methods of hand-drying, including paper towels, warm air dryers, and cloth towels, each claiming different levels of bacteria reduction efficacies.

Scientific experiments are conducted to evaluate these claims. The goal is to ascertain which method most effectively minimizes bacterial presence on the hands. In studies like the one described in the exercise, subjects' hands are contaminated and then washed, followed by drying with one of the methods being tested. The reduction in bacteria is measured, which shows the effectiveness of each drying method. It is important to use a standardized process for contaminating and washing hands in order to have a proper baseline for comparison. Additionally, the drying time and technique should be consistent across all methods to ensure that the results reflect the true efficacy of the drying methods themselves and not other variables.
Hand Hygiene Experiment
Conducting a hand hygiene experiment involves more than just the act of drying hands; it begins with a controlled contamination process followed by a standardized method of handwashing. In the experiment from the scenario, subjects handle uncooked chicken, which is known to contain bacteria, to ensure their hands are contaminated. They then wash their hands using a fixed amount of soap and for a set duration, standardizing the cleaning process.

After washing, the hand-drying methods are tested. The bacteria count is measured both before and after drying to determine the reduction in bacteria levels. The experiment's design aims to create a controlled environment that is as close to real-world scenarios as possible while eliminating variables that could affect the outcome. By standardizing each stage and conducting the experiment under strict conditions, researchers can draw meaningful conclusions about the best hand-drying method to reduce bacterial count and, by extension, improve hand hygiene practices.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For each of the statistical studies described indicate whether the study is an observational study or an experiment. Give a brief explanation for your choice. An article in USA Today (October 19,2010 ) describes a study of how young children learn. Sixty-four 18 -month-old toddlers participated in the study. The toddlers were allowed to play in a lab equipped with toys, which also had a robot hidden behind a screen. The article states: "After allowing the infants play time, the team removed the screen and let the children see the robot. In some tests, an adult talked to the robot and played with it. In others the adult ignored the robot. After the adult left the room, the robot beeped and then turned its head to look at a toy to the side of the infant. In cases where the adult had played with the robot, the infant was four times more likely to follow the robot's gaze to the toy."

Whether or not to continue a Mardi Gras Parade through downtown San Luis Obispo, California, is a hotly debated topic. The parade is popular with students and many residents, but some celebrations have led to complaints and a call to eliminate the parade. The local newspaper conducted online and telephone surveys of its readers and was surprised by the results. The online survey received more than 400 responses, with more than \(60 \%\) favoring continuing the parade, while the telephone response line received more than 120 calls, with more than \(90 \%\) favoring banning the parade (San Luis Obispo Tribune, March 3,2004 ). What factors may have contributed to these very different results?

The article "Display of Health Risk Behaviors on MySpace by Adolescents" (Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine [2009]: \(27-34\) ) described a study in which researchers looked at a random sample of 500 publicly accessible MySpace web profiles posted by 18-year-olds. The content of each profile was analyzed. One of the conclusions reported was that displaying sport or hobby involvement was associated with decreased references to risky behavior (sexual references or references to substance abuse or violence). a. Is it reasonable to generalize the stated conclusion to all 18-year-olds with a publicly accessible MySpace web profile? What aspect of the study supports your answer? b. Not all MySpace users have a publicly accessible profile. Is it reasonable to generalize the stated conclusion to all 18-year-old MySpace users? Explain. c. Is it reasonable to generalize the stated conclusion to all MySpace users with a publicly accessible profile? Explain.

A building contractor has a chance to buy an odd lot of 5,000 used bricks at an auction. She is interested in determining the proportion of bricks in the lot that are cracked and therefore unusable for her current project, but she does not have enough time to inspect all 5,000 bricks. Instead, she checks 100 bricks to determine whether each is cracked. Describe the population and sample for this problem.

Researchers at the University of Utah carried out a study to see if the size of the fork used to eat dinner has an effect on how much food is consumed (Food Network Magazine, January 2012). The researchers assigned people to one of two groups. One group ate dinner using a small fork, and the other group ate using a large fork. The researchers found that those who ate with a large fork ate less of the food on the plate than those who ate with the small fork. The title of the article describing this study was "Dieters Should Use a Big Fork." This title implies a cause-andeffect relationship between fork size and amount eaten and also generalizes this finding to the population of dieters. What would you need to know about the study design to determine if the conclusions implied by the headline are reasonable?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free