Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

For each of the statistical studies described, indicate whether the study is an observational study or an experiment. Give a brief explanation for your choice. A study of more than 50,000 nurses found that those who drank just one soda or fruit juice a day tended to gain more weight and had an increased risk of developing diabetes than those who drank less than one soda or fruit juice per day (The Washington Post, August 25,2004 ).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The given study is an observational study because researchers didn't manipulate any variables; they just observed and recorded the correlation between soda or juice consumption and weight gain/diabetes risk.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Study Details

Read the description of the study carefully. This study states that over 50,000 nurses were observed, their consumption of soda or fruit juice was noted, and the correlation between that and their weight gain and diabetes risk were observed.
02

Is there any Intervention or manipulation?

Closely examine whether there is any experimental setup or intervention by the researchers. In this study, there's no mention of any intervention, researchers were simply observing.
03

Determine the Type of Study

Given the understanding from the previous steps that there was no intervention by the researchers, one can decide that this is an observational study. The researchers didn't manipulate the variables but just observed the correlation between soda/juice consumption and weight gain/diabetes risk.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Observational Study
An observational study is a type of research where investigators observe subjects without intervening or changing the environment. In this method, data is gathered to identify patterns, trends, and outcomes associated with specific factors.

The example of the large study on nurses and their consumption habits is a classic case of an observational study. Over a significant sample size of nurses, their beverage consumption was recorded alongside observations regarding their weight changes and diabetes risk.

Here, the researchers did not manipulate any variables; they simply watched real-world behaviors and outcomes unfold. Such an approach is beneficial when ethical or logistical constraints prevent conducting experiments. However, it's worth noting that observational studies can primarily indicate associations, not causation.
Statistical Studies
The realm of statistical studies includes any research that relies on the collection and analysis of data. These studies are foundational in fields like economics, psychology, and, as shown in the exercise, health outcomes research.

Statistical studies come in two main flavors: observational studies, which we covered earlier, and experiments, where variables are manipulated to observe effects. Regardless of type, researchers use statistical methods to test hypotheses and generate actionable insights from the data.

Incorporating statistical control methods, like regression analysis, can help account for confounding variables, rendering the conclusions more reliable.
Experiment
In contrast to observational studies, an experiment requires active intervention. Researchers manipulate one or more variables to observe the effect on other variables; this is essential in establishing cause-and-effect relationships.

An experiment typically has a control group, which does not receive the intervention, and a treatment group, which does. By comparing outcomes between these groups, scientists can attribute differences to the intervention itself—assuming the experiment was designed and executed properly.

This approach's precision allows for thorough testing of theories and models, although it may not always reflect real-world complexity.
Correlation
Correlation is a statistical term describing the relationship between two or more variables or sets of data. When one variable changes, and another variable changes in association with the first, they are said to be correlated. However, this does not imply causation.

The nurses study mentioned earlier may have found a correlation between beverage consumption and health outcomes, but it did not conclusively establish that one causes the other. It's possible that other factors could contribute to the observed relationship. For instance, nurses who drink more soda might also have other lifestyle habits influencing their weight and health.
Health Outcomes Research
Health outcomes research seeks to understand the end results of healthcare practices and interventions. This field aims to discover the most effective and cost-efficient treatments by relying on various study designs, including both observational studies and experiments.

By examining the nurses' health changes in relation to their consumption habits, the research adds to our understanding of potential health risks associated with diet. This information can be vital for developing guidelines, improving patient care, and informing the public on healthy lifestyle choices.

The integrity of such research depends on careful study design, clear definition of outcomes, and robust statistical analysis. This ensures that the findings are valid and reliably guide health decisions and policy.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The authors of the paper "Popular Video Games: Quantifying the Presentation of Violence and its Context" (Journal of Broadcasting \& Electronic Media [2003]: 58-76) investigated the relationship between video game rating-suitable for everyone (E), suitable for 13 years of age and older (T), and suitable for 17 years of age and older \((\mathrm{M})-\) and the number of violent interactions per minute of play. The sample consisted of 60 video games \(-\) the 20 most popular (by sales) for each of three game systems. The researchers concluded that video games rated for older children had significantly more violent interactions per minute than video games rated for more general audiences. a. Do you think that the sample of 60 games was selected in a way that makes it representative of the population of all video games? b. Is it reasonable to generalize the researchers' conclusion to all video games? Explain why or why not.

With the increasing popularity of online shopping, many consumers use Internet access at work to browse and shop online. In fact, the Monday after Thanksgiving has been nicknamed "Cyber Monday" because of the large increase in online purchases that occurs that day. Data from a large-scale survey by a market research firm (Detroit Free Press, November 26,2005\()\) were used to calculate estimates of the percentage of men and women who shop online while at work. The resulting estimates probably won't make most employers happy \(-42 \%\) of the men and \(32 \%\) of the women surveyed were shopping online at work! If the population of interest is working men and women, does the group of people surveyed represent a census or a sample? Are the percentages quoted (42\% for men and \(32 \%\) for women) statistics or population characteristics?

Data from a poll conducted by Travelocity led to the following estimates: Approximately \(40 \%\) of travelers check their work e-mail while on vacation; about \(33 \%\) take their cell phones on vacation to stay connected with work; and about \(25 \%\) bring their laptops on vacation (San Luis Obispo Tribune, December 1,2005 ). Are the given percentages statistics or population characteristics?

Does living in the South cause high blood pressure? Data from a group of 6,278 people questioned in the Third National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey between 1988 and 1994 indicate that a greater percentage of Southerners have high blood pressure than do people living in any other region of the United States ("High Blood Pressure Greater Risk in U.S. South, Study Says," January \(6,2000, \mathrm{cnn.com}) .\) This difference in rate of high blood pressure was found in every ethnic group, gender, and age category studied. What are two possible reasons we cannot conclude that living in the South causes high blood pressure?

For each of the statistical studies described, indicate whether the study is an observational study or an experiment. Give a brief explanation for your choice. The paper "Health Halos and Fast-Food Consumption" (Journal of Consumer Research [2007]: 301-314) described a study in which 46 college students volunteered to participate. Half of the students were given a coupon for a McDonald's Big Mac sandwich and the other half were given a coupon for a Subway 12 -inch Italian BMT sandwich. (For comparison, the Big Mac has 600 calories, and the Subway 12 -inch Italian BMT sandwich has 900 calories.) The researchers were interested in how the perception of Subway as a healthy fast- food choice and McDonald's as an unhealthy fast-food choice would influence what additional items students would order with the sandwich. The researchers found that those who received the Subway coupon were less likely to order a diet soft drink, more likely to order a larger size drink, and more likely to order cookies than those who received the Big Mac coupon.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free