Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Use the following information to answer. The paper "Turning to Learn: Screen Orientation and Reasoning from Small Devices" (Computers in Human Behavior [2011]: \(793-797\) ) describes a study that investigated whether cell phones with small screens are useful for gathering information. The researchers wondered if the ability to reason using information read on a small screen was affected by the screen orientation. The researchers assigned 33 undergraduate students who were enrolled in a psychology course at a large public university to one of two groups at random. One group read material that was displayed on a small screen in portrait orientation, and the other group read material on the same size screen but turned to display the information in landscape orientation (see the following figure). Did the study use random assignment to experimental groups?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, the study used random assignment to experimental groups.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Concept

Random assignment is a fundamental part of experimental design in research studies. It entails dividing study participants into different groups randomly, thus eliminating any potential prejudice or bias during group formation. This helps to ensure that the groups are comparable, and any difference in outcomes can be attributed to the variable being tested instead of pre-existing differences among participants.
02

Review the Study Methodology

According to the provided details, researchers assigned 33 undergraduate students, who were enrolled in a psychology course at a large public university, to one of two groups at random. Within these groups, one read material displayed on a small screen in portrait orientation, the other group read material on a similarly small screen but in landscape orientation.
03

Determine if Random Assignment was used

From the provided description of the study methodology, it clearly states that the researchers 'assigned 33 undergraduate students to one of two groups at random.' This indicates that random assignment was indeed used in the study, as the students were allocated to groups based on chance rather than any specific characteristics.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Experimental Design
Experimental design is the backbone of any research study aiming to explore cause-and-effect relationships. At its core, this method is used to ensure that the researcher can indeed attribute observed effects within the study to the variable they're manipulating, rather than to some other, uncontrolled factor.

An exemplary experimental design integrates the random assignment of participants to different conditions or groups. This means every participant has an equal chance of being allocated to any given group. By doing this, researchers aim to create groups that are equivalent at the start of the experiment on all relevant factors except the one under investigation. This randomness acts as a safeguard against systemic biases that could twist the study's results.

In the case of the study on screen orientation and reasoning, random assignment was employed, consisting of randomly dividing the participants into groups with different screen orientations. This is crucial in trying to draw valid conclusions about the impact, if any, of screen orientation on reasoning ability, as it helps to isolate this single variable (screen orientation) from other potential confounding variables such as prior knowledge, age, or learning style.
Screen Orientation
Screen orientation — whether portrait or landscape — can significantly impact how we interact with and absorb information from devices with small screens. Portrait orientation refers to the vertical alignment of the content, which is commonly used for reading text, as it tends to fit the natural line of sight and hand ergonomics of scrolling. On the other hand, landscape orientation offers a wider horizontal view, which is often preferred for video content and can showcase more content side-by-side.

The difference in screen orientations might seem trivial at first glance, but when considering small devices, such as cell phones, it becomes particularly pertinent. The orientation can affect readability, the amount of information displayed at one time, and even the physical comfort of holding the device. Hence, researchers in the cited study 'Turning to Learn' focused on this variable to determine if it plays a role in reasoning outcomes. They supplied content in both orientations to see if there's a measurable effect on the user's ability to reason with the given information, underlining the importance of considering such factors in the realm of user experience (UX) design and ergonomics.
Reasoning from Small Devices
Reasoning from small devices is an evolving field of study, particularly relevant considering the ubiquity of smartphones and other portable digital devices. A key question revolves around whether the cognitive processes involved in reasoning are affected by the physical and technological constraints of these devices. When screens are small, the amount of visible information is limited, potentially necessitating more scrolling or switching between screens, which could interrupt thought processes or place additional memory demands on the user.

Understanding the cognitive impact of device size is not just an academic question; it has practical implications for the design of mobile-friendly content, apps, and education materials. If screen orientation or size impacts reasoning, as the study in question sets out to investigate, designers and educators would need to be mindful of how they present information on such devices. This emphasizes the importance of usability and accessibility in technology design – choices as simple as screen orientation could influence the effectiveness of technology-supported learning and information processing.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Whether or not to continue a Mardi Gras Parade through downtown San Luis Obispo, California, is a hotly debated topic. The parade is popular with students and many residents, but some celebrations have led to complaints and a call to eliminate the parade. The local newspaper conducted online and telephone surveys of its readers and was surprised by the results. The online survey received more than 400 responses, with more than \(60 \%\) favoring continuing the parade, while the telephone response line received more than 120 calls, with more than \(90 \%\) favoring banning the parade (San Luis Obispo Tribune, March 3,2004 ). What factors may have contributed to these very different results?

The article "Bicyclists and Other Cyclists" (Annals of Emergency Medicine [2010]: 426) reported that in 2008 , 716 bicyclists were killed on public roadways in the United States and that the average age of the cyclists killed was 41 years. These figures were based on an analysis of the records of all traffic-related deaths of bicyclists on U.S. public roadways (this information is kept by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration). a. Does the group of 716 bicycle fatalities represent a census or a sample of the bicycle fatalities in \(2008 ?\) b. If the population of interest is bicycle traffic fatalities in 2008 , is the given average age of 41 years a statistic or a population characteristic?

The authors of the paper "Illicit Use of Psychostimulants among College Students" (Psychology, Health \& Medicine [2002]: 283-287) surveyed college students about their use of legal and illegal stimulants. The sample of students surveyed consisted of students enrolled in a psychology class at a small, competitive college in the United States. a. Was this sample a simple random sample, a stratified sample, a systematic sample, or a convenience sample? Explain. b. Explain why an estimate of the proportion of students who reported using illegal stimulants based on data from this survey should not be generalized to all U.S. college students.

With the increasing popularity of online shopping, many consumers use Internet access at work to browse and shop online. In fact, the Monday after Thanksgiving has been nicknamed "Cyber Monday" because of the large increase in online purchases that occurs that day. Data from a large-scale survey by a market research firm (Detroit Free Press, November 26,2005\()\) were used to calculate estimates of the percentage of men and women who shop online while at work. The resulting estimates probably won't make most employers happy \(-42 \%\) of the men and \(32 \%\) of the women surveyed were shopping online at work! If the population of interest is working men and women, does the group of people surveyed represent a census or a sample? Are the percentages quoted (42\% for men and \(32 \%\) for women) statistics or population characteristics?

The article "Why We Fall for This" (AARP Magazine, May/June 2011) described a study in which a business professor divided his class into two groups. He showed students a mug and then asked students in one of the groups how much they would pay for the mug. Students in the other group were asked how much they would sell the mug for if it belonged to them. Surprisingly, the average value assigned to the mug was quite different for the two groups! Indicate whether the study is an observational study or an experiment. Give a brief explanation for your choice.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free