Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Based on a survey conducted on the DietSmart.com website, investigators concluded that women who regularly watched Oprah were only one-seventh as likely to crave fattening foods as those who watched other daytime talk shows (San Luis Obispo Tribune, October 14,2000 ). a. Is it reasonable to conclude that watching Oprah causes a decrease in cravings for fattening foods? Explain. b. Is it reasonable to generalize the results of this survey to all women in the United States? To all women who watch daytime talk shows? Explain why or why not.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. No, it's not reasonable to conclude that watching Oprah causes a decrease in cravings for fattening foods based on the given data. b. Also, without details on the sample used in this study, it's not reasonable to generalize this finding to all women in the U.S. or to all women who watch daytime talk shows.

Step by step solution

01

Determining the Causal Relationship

To determine if there is a causal relationship between watching Oprah and decreased craving for fattening foods, simply establish if there was an experiment conducted where one group watched Oprah while a control group did not. However, the exercise does not provide this information, hence causality cannot be established based only on this observation.
02

Analyze the Generalizability of Results

To determine if the results can be generalized to all women in the United States or to all women who watch daytime talk shows, it’s necessary to know how representative the sample in the study was. If a wide variety of women from different backgrounds, ages, regions, etc., were included in the study, it would be more convincing to generalize the findings. Again, without these details, it is imprudent to generalize the results of this survey.
03

Final Assessment

Summarize the findings from steps 1 and 2: Firstly, it's not reasonable to conclude that watching Oprah causes a decrease in cravings for fattening foods as the given information doesn't allow the establishment of causality. Secondly, without knowledge on the representativeness of the sample, the results cannot be generalized to all women in the United States or to all women who watch daytime talk shows.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Data from a poll conducted by Travelocity led to the following estimates: Approximately \(40 \%\) of travelers check their work e-mail while on vacation; about \(33 \%\) take their cell phones on vacation to stay connected with work; and about \(25 \%\) bring their laptops on vacation (San Luis Obispo Tribune, December 1,2005 ). Are the given percentages statistics or population characteristics?

According to the article "Effect of Preparation Methods on Total Fat Content, Moisture Content, and Sensory Characteristics of Breaded Chicken Nuggets and Beef Steak Fingers" (Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal [1999]: 18-27), sensory tests were conducted using 40 college student volunteers at Texas Women's University. Give three reasons, other than the relatively small sample size, why it would not be a good idea to generalize any study results to the population of all college students.

The article "l'd Like to Buy a Vowel, Drivers Say" (USA Today, August 7,2001 ) speculates that young people prefer automobile names that consist of just numbers and letters and that do not form a word (such as Hyundai's \(\mathrm{XG} 300\), Mazda's \(626,\) and BMW's \(325 \mathrm{i}\) ). The article goes on to state that Hyundai had planned to identify the car that was eventually marketed as the XG300 with the name Concerto, until they determined that consumers hated it and thought that XG300 sounded more "technical" and deserving of a higher price. Do the students at your school feel the same way? Suppose that a list of all the students at your school is available. Describe how you would use the list to select a simple random sample of 150 students. (Hint: see discussion on page 14 on selecting a random sample)

The article "Yes that Miley Cyrus Biography Helps Learning" (The Globe and Mail, August 5,2010 ) describes an experiment investigating whether providing summer reading books to low-income children would affect school performance. Subjects in the experiment were 1,300 children randomly selected from first and second graders at low-income schools in Florida. A group of 852 of these children were selected at random from the group of 1,300 participants to be in the book group. The other 478 children were assigned to the control group. Children in the book group were invited to a book fair in the spring to choose any 12 reading books that they could then take home. Children in the control group were not given any reading books, but were given some activity and puzzle books. These children received books each year for three years until the children reached third and fourth grade. The researchers then compared reading test scores of the two groups. a. Explain why randomly selecting 852 of the 1,300 children to be in the book group is equivalent to random assignment of the children to the two experimental groups. b. Explain the purpose of including a control group in this experiment.

An article titled "Guard Your Kids Against Allergies: Get Them a Pet" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, August 28,2002\()\) described a study that led researchers to conclude that "babies raised with two or more animals are about half as likely to have allergies by the time they turned six." Explain why it is not reasonable to conclude that being raised with two or more animals is the cause of the observed lower allergy rate.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free