Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A study of college students showed a temporary gain of up to nine IQ points after listening to a Mozart piano sonata. This result, dubbed the Mozart effect, has since been criticized by a number of researchers who have been unable to confirm the result in similar studies. Suppose that you want to determine if there is really is a Mozart effect. You decide to carry out an experiment with three experimental groups. One group will listen to a Mozart piano sonata that lasts 24 minutes. The second group will listen to popular music for the same length of time, and the third group will relax for 24 minutes with no music playing. You will measure IQ before and after the 24 minute period. Suppose that you have 45 volunteers who have agreed to participate in the experiment. Describe a method of randomly assigning each of the volunteers to one of the experimental groups.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Assign numbers 1-45 to all volunteers. Shuffle these labels thoroughly and draw 15 labels for the Mozart sonata group, another 15 for the popular music group, and the remaining 15 for the quiet relaxation group. Each draw is performed without replacement to maintain randomness.

Step by step solution

01

Preparing the Labels

Prepare labels representing all the volunteers. This can be accomplished by numbering from 1 to 45.
02

Shuffle the Labels

To ensure randomness, shuffle all the labels. This can be done by placing all the labels in a container and then stirring them around.
03

Divide the Volunteers into Groups

Draw out 15 labels, one by one, without returning any back to the container each time. The first 15 are assigned to the Mozart sonata group. Repeat the draw for the next 15 labels assigning them to the popular music group, and the final 15 labels form the quiet relaxation group. Ensure no bias is introduced during this process by maintaining a blind draw.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Random Assignment in Experiments
When conducting experiments, it's crucial to eliminate as much bias as possible to ensure the results are reliable. Random assignment is a technique used to allocate participants to different groups in an unbiased manner. This means that every volunteer has an equal chance of being placed in any of the groups.

For example, in an experiment designed to test the Mozart effect, you would label 45 volunteers and then randomly draw their labels to assign them to the Mozart sonata group, the popular music group, or the quiet relaxation group. By shuffling the labels thoroughly, random assignment minimizes confounding variables and helps to isolate the variable being tested—in this case, the type of audio exposure and its effect on IQ.
Experimental Design
A well-thought-out experimental design forms the backbone of any reliable study. It specifies how participants are selected, assigned to groups, and how the experiment is carried out. A good design ensures that the conclusions drawn are a direct result of the variable being tested, rather than external factors.

In the Mozart effect experiment, the design includes the type of music or relaxation method and the before-and-after IQ measurements. A solid design will address potential biases and incorporate elements like blinding and randomization to protect the integrity of the results.
Control Groups
Including control groups is a fundamental aspect of experimental design. Control groups enable researchers to compare results between the experimental group and a baseline or standard condition. In the context of the Mozart effect experiment, the control group could be the participants who relax without music. This group helps determine if changes in IQ scores are due to the specific conditions of the experiment (listening to Mozart or popular music) or if they are influenced by other factors like relaxation.

Without this comparison, it's difficult to attribute changes in IQ scores to the music alone, as other aspects of the experimental environment could be responsible. The control group, therefore, acts as a pivotal reference point for interpreting the effectiveness of the experimental conditions.
IQ Measurement
In experiments like these, IQ measurement is often the dependent variable used to assess cognitive ability. IQ tests aim to provide a standardized way to compare intelligence levels across different individuals. Usually, these tests assess various aspects like logic, math, language, and spatial reasoning.

For the Mozart effect, the difference in IQ scores before and after the experiment is particularly important. To ensure accurate measurements, a reliable and validated IQ test must be used, and conditions should be kept consistent to prevent external factors from affecting the outcome. It should be noted that IQ is a complex and sometimes controversial measure, influenced by many factors and not entirely definitive of a person's cognitive ability.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The authors of the paper "Popular Video Games: Quantifying the Presentation of Violence and its Context" (Journal of Broadcasting \& Electronic Media [2003]: 58-76) investigated the relationship between video game rating-suitable for everyone (E), suitable for 13 years of age and older (T), and suitable for 17 years of age and older \((\mathrm{M})-\) and the number of violent interactions per minute of play. The sample consisted of 60 video games \(-\) the 20 most popular (by sales) for each of three game systems. The researchers concluded that video games rated for older children had significantly more violent interactions per minute than video games rated for more general audiences. a. Do you think that the sample of 60 games was selected in a way that makes it representative of the population of all video games? b. Is it reasonable to generalize the researchers' conclusion to all video games? Explain why or why not.

Use the following information to answer. Many surgeons play music in the operating room. Does the type of music played have an effect on the surgeons' performance? The report "Death Metal in the Operating Room" (NPR, Dec. 24, 2009, www.npr.org) describes an experiment in which surgeons used a simulator to perform a surgery. Some of the surgeons listened to music with vocal elements while performing the surgery, and others listened to music that did not have vocal elements. The researchers concluded that the average time to complete the surgery was greater when music with vocal elements is played than when music without vocal elements is played. 1.43 Could this experiment have been double-blind? Explain why or why not.

The article "Display of Health Risk Behaviors on MySpace by Adolescents" (Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine [2009]: \(27-34\) ) described a study in which researchers looked at a random sample of 500 publicly accessible MySpace web profiles posted by 18-year-olds. The content of each profile was analyzed. One of the conclusions reported was that displaying sport or hobby involvement was associated with decreased references to risky behavior (sexual references or references to substance abuse or violence). a. Is it reasonable to generalize the stated conclusion to all 18-year-olds with a publicly accessible MySpace web profile? What aspect of the study supports your answer? b. Not all MySpace users have a publicly accessible profile. Is it reasonable to generalize the stated conclusion to all 18-year-old MySpace users? Explain. c. Is it reasonable to generalize the stated conclusion to all MySpace users with a publicly accessible profile? Explain.

The authors of the paper "Fudging the Numbers: Distributing Chocolate Influences Student Evaluations of an Undergraduate Course" (Teaching in Psychology [2007]: \(245-247\) ) carried out a study to see if events unrelated to an undergraduate course could affect student evaluations. Students enrolled in statistics courses taught by the same instructor participated in the study. All students attended the same lectures and one of six discussion sections that met once a week. At the end of the course, the researchers chose three of the discussion sections to be the "chocolate group." Students in these three sections were offered chocolate prior to having them fill out course evaluations. Students in the other three sections were not offered chocolate. The researchers concluded that "Overall, students offered chocolate gave more positive evaluations than students not offered chocolate." Indicate whether the study is an observational study or an experiment. Give a brief explanation for your choice.

Can moving their hands help children learn math? This is the question investigated by the authors of the paper "Gesturing Gives Children New Ideas about Math" (Psychological Science [2009]: \(267-272\) ). An experiment was conducted to compare two different methods for teaching children how to solve math problems of the form \(3+2+8=\ldots+8\). One method involved having students point to the \(3+2\) on the left side of the equal sign with one hand and then point to the blank on the right side of the equal sign before filling in the blank to complete the equation. The other method did not involve using these hand gestures. The paper states that the study used children ages 9 and 10 who were given a pretest containing six problems of the type described. Only children who answered all six questions incorrectly became subjects in the experiment. There were a total of 128 subjects. To compare the two methods, the 128 children were assigned at random to the two experimental conditions. Children in one group were taught a method that used hand gestures, and children in the other group were taught a similar strategy that did not involve hand gestures. Each child then took a test with six problems and received a score based on the number correct. From the resulting data, the researchers concluded that the average score for children who used hand gestures was significantly higher than the average score for children who did not use hand gestures. a. Answer the following seven questions for the experiment described above. (Hint: Reviewing Examples 1.5 and 1.6 might be helpful.) 1\. What question is the experiment trying to answer? 2\. What are the experimental conditions (treatments) for this experiment? 3\. What is the response variable? 4\. What are the experimental units and how were they selected? 5\. Does the design incorporate random assignment of experimental units to the different experimental conditions? If not, are there potentially confounding variables that would make it difficult to draw conclusions based on data from the experiment? 6\. Does the experiment incorporate a control group and/or a placebo group? If not, would the experiment be improved by including them? 7\. Does the experiment involve blinding? If not, would the experiment be improved by making it single- or double-blind? b. Based on the study design, do you think that the conclusions are reasonable?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free