Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

For each of the statistical studies described indicate whether the study is an observational study or an experiment. Give a brief explanation for your choice. The article "Tots TV-Watching May Spur Attention Problems" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, April 4,2004\()\) described a study that appeared in the journal Pediatrics. Researchers looked at records of 2,500 children who were participating in a long-term health study. They found that \(10 \%\) of these children had attention disorders at age 7 and that the number of hours of television watched at ages 1 and 3 was associated with an increased risk of having an attention disorder at age 7 .

Short Answer

Expert verified
The study described in the article 'Tots TV-Watching May Spur Attention Problems' is an observational study, as researchers merely observed and collected data without manipulating any conditions or variables.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Type of Study

In this case, researchers looked at records of 2,500 children who were participating in a long-term health study. They gathered existing data, without manipulating any factors such as the number of hours the children watched television. This indicates an observational study.
02

Reason for the Identification

They found that 10 percent of these children had attention disorders at age 7 and there was an association between the amount of television watched at ages 1 and 3 and the attention disorder at age 7. The researchers didn’t control or affect any variables, they only observed and analyzed the available data for possible relationships. This is a primary feature of observational studies.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The authors of the paper "Fudging the Numbers: Distributing Chocolate Influences Student Evaluations of an Undergraduate Course" (Teaching in Psychology [2007]: \(245-247\) ) carried out a study to see if events unrelated to an undergraduate course could affect student evaluations. Students enrolled in statistics courses taught by the same instructor participated in the study. All students attended the same lectures and one of six discussion sections that met once a week. At the end of the course, the researchers chose three of the discussion sections to be the "chocolate group." Students in these three sections were offered chocolate prior to having them fill out course evaluations. Students in the other three sections were not offered chocolate. The researchers concluded that "Overall, students offered chocolate gave more positive evaluations than students not offered chocolate." Indicate whether the study is an observational study or an experiment. Give a brief explanation for your choice.

Can moving their hands help children learn math? This is the question investigated by the authors of the paper "Gesturing Gives Children New Ideas about Math" (Psychological Science [2009]: \(267-272\) ). An experiment was conducted to compare two different methods for teaching children how to solve math problems of the form \(3+2+8=\ldots+8\). One method involved having students point to the \(3+2\) on the left side of the equal sign with one hand and then point to the blank on the right side of the equal sign before filling in the blank to complete the equation. The other method did not involve using these hand gestures. The paper states that the study used children ages 9 and 10 who were given a pretest containing six problems of the type described. Only children who answered all six questions incorrectly became subjects in the experiment. There were a total of 128 subjects. To compare the two methods, the 128 children were assigned at random to the two experimental conditions. Children in one group were taught a method that used hand gestures, and children in the other group were taught a similar strategy that did not involve hand gestures. Each child then took a test with six problems and received a score based on the number correct. From the resulting data, the researchers concluded that the average score for children who used hand gestures was significantly higher than the average score for children who did not use hand gestures. a. Answer the following seven questions for the experiment described above. (Hint: Reviewing Examples 1.5 and 1.6 might be helpful.) 1\. What question is the experiment trying to answer? 2\. What are the experimental conditions (treatments) for this experiment? 3\. What is the response variable? 4\. What are the experimental units and how were they selected? 5\. Does the design incorporate random assignment of experimental units to the different experimental conditions? If not, are there potentially confounding variables that would make it difficult to draw conclusions based on data from the experiment? 6\. Does the experiment incorporate a control group and/or a placebo group? If not, would the experiment be improved by including them? 7\. Does the experiment involve blinding? If not, would the experiment be improved by making it single- or double-blind? b. Based on the study design, do you think that the conclusions are reasonable?

For each of the statistical studies described indicate whether the study is an observational study or an experiment. Give a brief explanation for your choice. The following conclusion from a statistical study appeared in the article "Smartphone Nation" (AARP Bulletin, September 2009): "If you love your smart phone, you are not alone. Half of all boomers sleep with their cell phone within arm's length. Two of three people ages 50 to 64 use a cell phone to take photos, according to a 2010 Pew Research Center report."

The article "Why We Fall for This" (AARP Magazine, May/June 2011) described a study in which a business professor divided his class into two groups. He showed students a mug and then asked students in one of the groups how much they would pay for the mug. Students in the other group were asked how much they would sell the mug for if it belonged to them. Surprisingly, the average value assigned to the mug was quite different for the two groups! Indicate whether the study is an observational study or an experiment. Give a brief explanation for your choice.

The article "Doctor Dogs Diagnose Cancer by Sniffing It Out" (Knight Ridder Newspapers, January 9, 2006) refers to an experiment described in the journal Integrative Cancer Therapies. In this experiment, dogs were trained to distinguish between people with breast and lung cancer and people without cancer by sniffing exhaled breath. Dogs were trained to lie down if they detected cancer in a breath sample. After training, the dogs' ability to detect cancer was tested using breath samples from people whose breath had not been used in training the dogs. The paper states, "The researchers blinded both the dog handlers and the experimental observers to the identity of the breath samples." Explain why this blinding is an important aspect of the design of this experiment.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free