Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The article "How Dangerous Is a Day in the Hospital?" (Medical Care [2011]: \(1068-1075)\) describes a study to determine if the risk of an infection is related to the length of a hospital stay. The researchers looked at a large number of hospitalized patients and compared the proportion who got an infection for two groups of patients-those who were hospitalized overnight and those who were hospitalized for more than one night. Indicate whether the study is an observational study or an experiment. Give a brief explanation for your choice.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The study is an observational study, as the researchers merely observed the outcomes without intervening.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the nature of the study

Firstly, read the description of the study carefully. The researchers reviewed a large number of hospitalized patients and compared the proportion who got an infection for two groups of patients, i.e., those who were hospitalized overnight and those who were hospitalized for more than one night. It is not mentioned that the researchers manipulated the conditions.
02

Compare the nature of the study with the characteristics of observational study and experimental study

Based on the description provided and the definitions of observational and experimental studies, the characteristics of the study match more closely with those of an observational study. In this case, researchers have not manipulated anything; they have merely recorded the data that they have observed.
03

Conclude the type of the study

Since the researchers observed the patients' outcomes without intervening in their hospital stays, this study is an observational study.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Observational Study
When researchers aim to gather data without altering the environment or manipulating the variables, they conduct an observational study. In this type of research, the goal is to draw conclusions from naturally occurring relationships or patterns observed in a specific setting. A classic example is observing how the duration of hospital stays might correlate with the incidence of hospital-acquired infections. The key to an observational study is that the researchers do not interfere; they simply observe and record.

Think of observational studies as a photographer capturing moments as they happen, without directing the subjects or setting. This passive data collection allows researchers to understand the status quo, but it can also introduce variables that aren't controlled, which might affect the outcome.
Experimental Study
Contrasting with observational studies, an experimental study involves an active manipulation of variables to observe the effect of such changes. Researchers might introduce a new medication, treatment plan, or some form of intervention to see how it influences the subjects under study.

In the context of hospital settings, an experimental study could involve assigning patients to different sanitation protocols to evaluate their effectiveness in preventing hospital-acquired infections. The hallmark of this approach is its controlled environment, where the cause-and-effect relationship is clearer due to the intentional introduction of the independent variable by the researchers.
Hospital-Acquired Infections
An ever-present concern in healthcare settings is hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), also known as nosocomial infections. These are infections patients acquire while receiving treatment for other conditions within a healthcare facility. HAIs can be linked to numerous factors including the length of stay, the invasiveness of procedures, or the sanitary conditions.

Studying HAIs is complex and requires meticulous research design to isolate the causes and effective prevention strategies. Both observational and experimental studies play pivotal roles in understanding these infections and can inform policies for improving patient care and hospital procedures.
Study Design in Research
Choosing the right study design is critical in research as it underpins the validity and reliability of the findings. Observational studies are often used when ethical considerations prevent the manipulation of variables, whereas experimental studies are chosen when a high degree of control over variables is possible and desirable.

In researching HAIs, for example, study design will determine how effectively the research can elucidate the relationship between hospital conditions and infection rates. A well-designed study considers factors such as sample size, selection criteria, and potential confounders to ensure that conclusions drawn are as accurate and generalizable as possible.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Data from a poll conducted by Travelocity led to the following estimates: Approximately \(40 \%\) of travelers check their work e-mail while on vacation; about \(33 \%\) take their cell phones on vacation to stay connected with work; and about \(25 \%\) bring their laptops on vacation (San Luis Obispo Tribune, December 1,2005 ). Are the given percentages statistics or population characteristics?

Researchers at the University of Utah carried out a study to see if the size of the fork used to eat dinner has an effect on how much food is consumed (Food Network Magazine, January 2012). The researchers assigned people to one of two groups. One group ate dinner using a small fork, and the other group ate using a large fork. The researchers found that those who ate with a large fork ate less of the food on the plate than those who ate with the small fork. The title of the article describing this study was "Dieters Should Use a Big Fork." This title implies a cause-andeffect relationship between fork size and amount eaten and also generalizes this finding to the population of dieters. What would you need to know about the study design to determine if the conclusions implied by the headline are reasonable?

The Institute of Psychiatry at Kings College London found that dealing with "infomania" has a temporary, but significant, negative effect on IQ (Discover, November 2005). To reach this conclusion, researchers divided volunteers into two groups. Each subject took an IQ test. One group had to check e-mail and respond to instant messages while taking the test, and the other group took the test without any distraction. The distracted group had an average score that was 10 points lower than the average for the control group. Explain why it is important that the researchers use random assignment to create the two experimental groups.

The article "Doctor Dogs Diagnose Cancer by Sniffing It Out" (Knight Ridder Newspapers, January 9, 2006) refers to an experiment described in the journal Integrative Cancer Therapies. In this experiment, dogs were trained to distinguish between people with breast and lung cancer and people without cancer by sniffing exhaled breath. Dogs were trained to lie down if they detected cancer in a breath sample. After training, the dogs' ability to detect cancer was tested using breath samples from people whose breath had not been used in training the dogs. The paper states, "The researchers blinded both the dog handlers and the experimental observers to the identity of the breath samples." Explain why this blinding is an important aspect of the design of this experiment.

For each of the statistical studies described indicate whether the study is an observational study or an experiment. Give a brief explanation for your choice. The article "Tots TV-Watching May Spur Attention Problems" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, April 4,2004\()\) described a study that appeared in the journal Pediatrics. Researchers looked at records of 2,500 children who were participating in a long-term health study. They found that \(10 \%\) of these children had attention disorders at age 7 and that the number of hours of television watched at ages 1 and 3 was associated with an increased risk of having an attention disorder at age 7 .

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free