Chapter 5: Q4E (page 303)
Refer to Exercise 5.3 and find . Then use the sampling distribution offound in Exercise 5.3 to find the expected value of. Note that.
Chapter 5: Q4E (page 303)
Refer to Exercise 5.3 and find . Then use the sampling distribution offound in Exercise 5.3 to find the expected value of. Note that.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeA random sample of n=900 observations is selected from a population with
a. What are the largest and smallest values of that you would expect to see?
b. How far, at the most, would you expect to deviate from ?
c. Did you have to know to answer part b? Explain.
Question: Hotel guest satisfaction. Refer to the results of the 2015 North American Hotel Guest Satisfaction Index Study, Exercise 4.49 (p. 239). Recall that 15% of hotel guests were “delighted” with their experience (giving a rating of 10 out of 10); of these guests, 80% stated they would “definitely” recommend the hotel. In a random sample of 100 hotel guests, find the probability that fewer than 10 were delighted with their stay and would recommend the hotel.
Tomato as a taste modifier. Miraculin is a protein naturally produced in a rare tropical fruit that can convert a sour taste into a sweet taste. Refer to the Plant Science (May 2010) investigation of the ability of a hybrid tomato plant to produce miraculin, Exercise 4.99 (p. 263). Recall that the amount x of miraculin produced in the plant had a mean of 105.3 micrograms per gram of fresh weight with a standard deviation of 8.0. Consider a random sample of hybrid tomato plants and let represent the sample mean amount of miraculin produced. Would you expect to observe a value of less than 103 micrograms per gram of fresh weight? Explain.
Fecal pollution at Huntington Beach. California mandates fecal indicator bacteria monitoring at all public beaches. When the concentration of fecal bacteria in the water exceeds a certain limit (400 colony-forming units of fecal coliform per 100 millilitres), local health officials must post a sign (called surf zone posting) warning beachgoers of potential health risks. For fecal bacteria, the state uses a single-sample standard; if the fecal limit is exceeded in a single sample of water, surf zone posting is mandatory. This single-sample standard policy has led to a recent rash of beach closures in California. A study of the surf water quality at Huntington Beach in California was published in Environmental Science & Technology (September 2004). The researchers found that beach closings were occurring despite low pollution levels in some instances, while in others, signs were not posted when the fecal limit was exceeded. They attributed these "surf zone posting errors" to the variable nature of water quality in the surf zone (for example, fecal bacteria concentration tends to be higher during ebb tide and at night) and the inherent time delay between when a water sample is collected and when a sign is posted or removed. To prevent posting errors, the researchers recommend using an averaging method rather than a single sample to determine unsafe water quality. (For example, one simple averaging method is to take a random sample of multiple water specimens and compare the average fecal bacteria level of the sample with the limit of 400 CFU/100 mL to determine whether the water is safe.) Discuss the pros and cons of using the single sample standard versus the averaging method. Part of your discussion should address the probability of posting a sign when the water is safe and the probability of posting a sign when the water is unsafe. (Assume that the fecal bacteria concentrations of water specimens at Huntington Beach follow an approximately normal distribution.
Question: Consider the following probability distribution:
a. Findand .
b. Find the sampling distribution of the sample mean x for a random sample of n = 2 measurements from this distribution
c. Show thatis an unbiased estimator of . [Hint: Show that. ]
d. Find the sampling distribution of the sample variancefor a random sample of n = 2 measurements from this distribution.
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.