Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Tomato as a taste modifier. Miraculin is a protein naturally produced in a rare tropical fruit that can convert a sour taste into a sweet taste. Refer to the Plant Science (May 2010) investigation of the ability of a hybrid tomato plant to produce miraculin, Exercise 4.99 (p. 263). Recall that the amount x of miraculin produced in the plant had a mean of 105.3 micrograms per gram of fresh weight with a standard deviation of 8.0. Consider a random sample of n=64hybrid tomato plants and letx represent the sample mean amount of miraculin produced. Would you expect to observe a value of X less than 103 micrograms per gram of fresh weight? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The probability that it is observed a sample mean below x¯<103micrograms if the mean and standard deviation of the miraculin are, respectively,μ=105.3σ=8 is 0.0107. The probability is very small. This is because the researcher has observed an extremely rare event.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The Given problem explains that the amount xof miraculin produced in the plant had a mean of 105.3 micro-gram of fresh weight with a standard deviation of 8.0.

A random sample of n=64hybrid tomato plants were considered, and the calculated sample mean.

02

Calculating the probability

Here, to find the probability of observing a value ofx¯less than 103 micrograms per gram of fresh weight. That is,P(x¯<103)

To find this probability, invoke the Central limit theorem.

According to the theorem, the sampling distribution of x¯has the following mean and standard deviation:

μx=μandσx=σn

Therefore,

μx¯=105.3

σx=σn=864=1

The theorem also states that x¯is approximately normally distributed.

Therefore, find desired probability as follows:

P(x¯<103)=Px¯μx¯σx¯<103105.31=P(z<2.3)

=0.0107

Therefore, the required probability is 0.0107.

The probability that it is observed a sample mean belowx¯<103

Micrograms, if the miraculin mean and standard deviation are, respectively, μ=105.3andσ=8 is 0.0107.

Since the researcher observed an extremely rare incident, the probability is incredibly low.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Fecal pollution at Huntington Beach. California mandates fecal indicator bacteria monitoring at all public beaches. When the concentration of fecal bacteria in the water exceeds a certain limit (400 colony-forming units of fecal coliform per 100 millilitres), local health officials must post a sign (called surf zone posting) warning beachgoers of potential health risks. For fecal bacteria, the state uses a single-sample standard; if the fecal limit is exceeded in a single sample of water, surf zone posting is mandatory. This single-sample standard policy has led to a recent rash of beach closures in California. A study of the surf water quality at Huntington Beach in California was published in Environmental Science & Technology (September 2004). The researchers found that beach closings were occurring despite low pollution levels in some instances, while in others, signs were not posted when the fecal limit was exceeded. They attributed these "surf zone posting errors" to the variable nature of water quality in the surf zone (for example, fecal bacteria concentration tends to be higher during ebb tide and at night) and the inherent time delay between when a water sample is collected and when a sign is posted or removed. To prevent posting errors, the researchers recommend using an averaging method rather than a single sample to determine unsafe water quality. (For example, one simple averaging method is to take a random sample of multiple water specimens and compare the average fecal bacteria level of the sample with the limit of 400 CFU/100 mL to determine whether the water is safe.) Discuss the pros and cons of using the single sample standard versus the averaging method. Part of your discussion should address the probability of posting a sign when the water is safe and the probability of posting a sign when the water is unsafe. (Assume that the fecal bacteria concentrations of water specimens at Huntington Beach follow an approximately normal distribution.

A random sample of n = 80 measurements is drawn from a binomial population with a probability of success .3.

  1. Give the mean and standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the sample proportion, p¯
  2. Describe the shape of the sampling distribution of p¯
  3. Calculate the standard normal z-score corresponding to a value of p¯=0.35
  4. FindP(p)¯=0.35

Suppose a random sample of n = 25 measurements are selected from a population with mean μand standard deviation s. For each of the following values of μand role="math" localid="1651468116840" σ, give the values of μχ¯ and σχ¯.

  1. μ=100,σ=3
  2. μ=100,σ=25
  3. μ=20,σ=40
  4. μ=10,σ=100

Question:Fingerprint expertise. Refer to the Psychological Science (August 2011) study of fingerprint identification, Exercise 4.53 (p. 239). Recall that when presented with prints from the same individual, a fingerprint expert will correctly identify the match 92% of the time. Consider a forensic database of 1,000 different pairs of fingerprints, where each pair is a match.

a. What proportion of the 1,000 pairs would you expect an expert to correctly identify as a match?

b. What is the probability that an expert will correctly identify fewer than 900 of the fingerprint matches?

Motivation of drug dealers. Refer to the Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice (September 2009) investigation of the personality characteristics of drug dealers, Exercise 2.80 (p. 111). Convicted drug dealers were scored on the Wanting Recognition (WR) Scale. This scale provides a quantitative measure of a person’s level of need for approval and sensitivity to social situations. (Higher scores indicate a greater need for approval.) Based on the study results, we can assume that the WR scores for the population of convicted drug dealers have a mean of 40 and a standard deviation of 5. Suppose that in a sample of 100 people, the mean WR scale score is x = 42. Is this sample likely selected from the population of convicted drug dealers? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free