Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Drug testing in the workplace. In Canada, the Supreme Court recently ruled that employees can be tested for drugs only if management has reasonable cause to administer the test. An article in Chance(Vol. 28, 2015) focused on the misclassification rates of such drug tests. A false positiveoccurs when a drug test administered to a non– drug user yields a positive result. A false negativeoccurs when a drug test administered to a drug user yields a negative result.

  1. The author presented the following scenario: Suppose that 5% of a population of workers consists of drug users. The drug test has a false positive rate (i.e., the probability of a positive drug test given the worker is a non–drug user) of 5% and a false negative rate (i.e., the probability of a negative drug test given the worker is a drug user) of 5%. A worker selected from this population is drug tested and found to have a positive result. What is the probability that the worker is a non–drug user? Apply Bayes’ Rule to obtain your answer.
  2. Recall that in Canada, drug tests can be administered only with probable cause. Hence, for workers that are tested, it is likely that a high proportion of them use drugs. Now consider a population of workers in which 95% are drug users. Again, assume both the false positive rate and false negative rate of the drug test are 5%. A worker selected from this population is drug tested and found to have a positive result. What is the probability that the worker is a non–drug user?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. The probability that an employee is not a drug user is 0.5.
  2. The probability that a worker is not a drug user is 0.0028.

Step by step solution

01

Important formula

The formula for probability isP=favourableoutcomestotaloutcomes

The Baye’s formula is

role="math" localid="1659703278889" P(BiA)=P(BiA)P(A)=P(Bi)P(ABi)P(B1)P(AB1)+P(B2)P(AB2)+...+P(Bk)P(ABk)

02

(a)Step 2: The probability that the worker is a non–drug user.

a.

Here,

D=Drug user.

T=Drug test is positive

Apply the Baye’s formula:

P(Dc|T)=P(DcT)P(T)=P(T|Dc)×P(Dc)P(T)

Now find the value of P(T),

P(T)=P(DcT)+P(DT)=[P(T|Dc)×P(Dc)]+[P(T|D)×P(D)]=[(1-P(D)P(T|Dc)]+[(1-P(T|D))×P(D)]=[(1-0.05)(0.05)]+[0.05(1-0.05)]=0.095

Then,

P(Dc|T)=0.05(1-0.05)0.095=0.5

Hence, there is a 0.5 chance that a worker does not utilize drugs.

03

The probability that the worker is a non–drug user

b.

P(T)=[1-0.95(0.05)+0.95(1-0.05)]=0.905

P(Dc|T)=0.05(1-0.95)0.905=0.0028

Therefore,the probability that a worker is not drug user is 0.0028.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Is a product “green”?A “green” product (e.g., a productbuilt from recycled materials) is one that has minimal impact on the environment and human health. How do consumers determine if a product is “green”? The 2011

ImagePower Green Brands Survey asked this question of more than 9,000 international consumers. The results are shown in the following table.

Reason for saying a product is green

Percentage of consumers

Certification mark on label

45

Packaging

15

Reading information about the product

12

Advertisement

6

Brand we site

4

Other

18

Total

100

a.What method is an international consumer most likely to use to identify a green product?

b.Find the probability that an international consumer identifies a green product by a certification mark on the product label or by the product packaging.

c.Find the probability that an international consumer identifies a green product by reading about the product or from information at the brand’s Web site.

d.Find the probability that an international consumer does not use advertisements to identify a green product.

“Let’s Make a Deal.”Marilyn vos Savant, who is listedin Guinness Book of World Records Hall of Fame for“Highest IQ,” writes a weekly column in the Sunday newspaper supplement Parade Magazine. Her column, “AskMarilyn,” is devoted to games of skill, puzzles, and mind-bendingriddles. In one issue (Parade Magazine, February 24, 1991), vos Savant posed the following question:

Suppose you’re on a game show, and you’re given a choice of three doors. Behind one door is a car; behind the others, goats. You pick a door—say, #1—and the host, who knows what’s behind the doors, opens another door—say #3—which has a goat. He then says to you, “Do you want to pick door #2?” Is it to your advantage to switch your choice?

Marilyn’s answer: “Yes, you should switch. The first door has a 13 chance of winning [the car], but the second has a 23 chance [of winning the car].” Predictably, vos Savant’s surprising answer elicited thousands of criticalletters, many of them from PhD mathematicians, who disagreed with her. Who is correct, the PhDs or Marilyn?

World Cup soccer match draws. Every 4 years the world’s 32 best national soccer teams compete for the World Cup. Run by FIFA (Fédération Internationale de Football Association), national teams are placed into eight groups of four teams, with the group winners advancing to play for the World Cup. Chance(Spring 2007) investigated the fairness of the 2006 World Cup draw. Each of the top 8 seeded teams (teams ranked 1–8, called pot 1) were placed into one of the eight groups (named Group A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H). The remaining 24 teams were assigned to 3 pots of 8 teams each to achieve the best possible geographic distribution between the groups. The teams in pot 2 were assigned to groups as follows: the first team drawn was placed into Group A, the second team drawn was placed in to Group B, etc. Teams in pots 3 and 4 were assigned to the groups in similar fashion. Because teams in pots 2–4 are not necessarily placed there based on their world ranking, this typically leads to a “group of death,” i.e., a group involving at least two highly seeded teams where only one can advance.

  1. In 2006, Germany (as the host country) was assigned as the top seed in Group A. What is the probability that Paraguay (with the highest ranking in pot 2) was assigned to Group A?
  2. Many soccer experts viewed the South American teams (Ecuador and Paraguay) as the most dangerous teams in pot 2. What is the probability one of the South American teams was assigned to Group A?
  3. In 2006, Group B was considered the “group of death,” with England (world rank 2), Paraguay (highest rank in pot 2), Sweden (2nd highest rank in pot 3), and Trinidad and Tobago. What is the probability that Group B included the team with the highest rank in pot 2 and the team with one of the top two ranks in pot 3?
  4. In drawing teams from pot 2, there was a notable exception in 2006. If a South American team (either Ecuador or Paraguay) was drawn into a group with another South American team, it was automatically moved to the next group. This rule impacted Group C (Argentina as the top seed) and Group F (Brazil as the top seed), because they already had South American teams, and groups that followed these groups in the draw. Now Group D included the eventual champion Italy as its top seed. What is the probability that Group D was not assigned one of the dangerous South American teams in pot 2?

The outcomes of two variables are (Low, Medium, High) and (On, Off), respectively. An experiment is conducted in which the outcomes of each of the two variables are observed. The accompanying two-way table gives the probabilities associated with each of the six possible outcome pairs.

Low

Medium

High

On

.50

.10

.05

Off

.25

.07

.03

Consider the following events:

A: {On}

B: {Medium or on}

C: {Off and Low}

D: {High}

a. Find P (A).

b. Find P (B).

c. Find P (C).

d. Find P (D).

e. FindP(AC).

f. FindP(AB).

g. FindP(AB).

h. Consider each pair of events (A and B, A and C, A and D, B and C, B and D, C and D). List the pairs of events that are mutually exclusive. Justify your choices.

Management system failures. Refer to the Process Safety Progress (December 2004) study of 83 industrial accidents caused by management system failures, Exercise 2.150(p. 142). A summary of the root causes of these 83 incidents is reproduced in the following table. One of the 83 incidents is randomly selected and the root cause is determined.

Management system cause category

Number of incidents

Engineering and design

27

Procedures and practices

24

Management and oversight

22

Training and communication

10

Total

83

a. List the sample points for this problem and assign reasonable probabilities to them.

b. Find and interpret the probability that an industrial accident is caused by faulty engineering and design.

c. Find and interpret the probability that an industrial accident is caused by something other than faulty procedures and practices.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free