Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Wine quality and soil.The Journal of Wine Research(Vol.21, 2010) published a study of the effects of soil and climate on the quality of wine produced in Spain. The soil at two vineyards— Llarga and Solar—was the focus of the analysis.Wine produced from grapes grown in each of the two vineyards

was evaluated for each of three different years (growing seasons) by a wine-tasting panel. Based on the taste tests, the panel (as a group) selected the wine with the highest quality.

a.How many different wines were evaluated by the panel, where one wine was produced for each vineyard/growing season combination?

b.If the wines were all of equal quality, what is the probability that the panel selected a Llarga wine as the wine with the highest quality?

c.If the wines were all of equal quality, what is the probability that the panel selected a wine produced in year 3 as the wine with the highest quality?

d.The panel consisted of four different wine tasters who performed the evaluations independently of each other. If the wines were all of equal quality, what is the probability that all four tasters selected a Llarga wine as the wine with the highest quality?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. The panel evaluated the different wines in two vineyards is 6.
  2. The probability that the panel selected a Llarga wine as the wine with the highest quality is 0.5.
  3. The probability that the panel selected a wine produced in year 3 as the wine with the highest quality 0.3.
  4. The probability that all four tasters selected a Llarga wine as the wine with the highest quality 0.063.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

A study on the impact of soil and climate on the quality of wine produced in Spain was published in The Journal of Wine Research (Vol. 21, 2010).The investigation focused on the soil at two vineyards, Llarga and Solar.The wine produced from grapes grown in each of the two vineyardswas evaluated for each of three different years (growing seasons) by a wine-tasting panel. The panel (as a whole) decided on the wine with the highest quality based on the tasting tests.

02

The different wines were evaluated by the panel. 

For the result apply the formula of combination.=23=6

So, six distinct wines from two vineyards were assessed by the panel.

03

Possibility that a Llarga wine was chosen by the panel as the best wine

The probability the value of combination is 6 and there are 3 panels for Llarge wine then the probability is 36=0.5.

So, there is a 0.5 percent chance that the panel chose a Llarga wine as the best wine.

04

The probability that the panel selected a wine produced in year 3 as the wine with the highest quality.

The probability the value of combination is 6 in past three years and there are 2 combinationsthen the probability is 26=0.3.

Therefore, there is a 0.3 chance that the panel would choose a wine made in year 3 as the wine with the highest quality.

05

The probability that all four tasters selected a Llarga wine as the wine with the highest quality

The require formula is

P(four individual tasters)=P(Llarge wine)4=(0.5)4 =0.063

Hence, the likelihood that each of the four tasters picked a Llarga wine as the best wine is 0.063.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Who prepares your tax return? As part of a study on income tax compliance (Behavioral Research and Accounting, January 2015), researchers sampled 270 adults at a shopping mall and asked each: “Who usually prepares your tax return?” Their answers (and frequency of responses) are shown in the table (p. 170). Use the information in the table to estimate the probability that a randomly selected adult uses a friend, relative, or professional to prepare his or her income tax return.

Table for Exercise 3.16

Response

Frequency

You

100

Your spouse

16

Equally with spouse

7

Friend or relative

31

Professional help

114

Not required to file

2

TOTAL

270

Source: S. Bhattacharjee, K. Moreno, and D. Salbador, “The Impact of Multiple Tax Returns on Tax Compliance Behavior,” Behavioral Research and Accounting, Vol. 27, No. 1, January 2015 (from Table 1).

Question: Refer to Exercise 3.35. Use the same event definitions to do the following exercises.

a. Write the event that the outcome is "On" and "High" as an intersection of two events.

b. Write the event that the outcome is "Low" or "Medium" as the complement of an event.

Firefighter glove sizing. Human Factors (December 2015) published a study on how well firefighter gloves fit. In a group of 586 firefighters who reported their glove size, the researchers determined whether the gloves fit well or poorly by gender. The data are summarized in the accompanying table. Consider the gender and glove fit status of a randomly selected firefighter.

a. List the sample points for this experiment.

b. Assign reasonable probabilities to these sample points.

c. Find the probability the firefighter is a female.

d. Find the probability the glove fits well.

e. Find the probability the firefighter is a female and has a well-fitting glove.

f. Find the probability the firefighter is a female or has a well-fitting glove.

Glove Fits Well

Glove Fits Poorly

Totals

Males

415

132

547

Females

19

50

39

Totals

434

152

586

Source: H. Hsiao, et al., “Firefighter Hand Anthropometry and Structural Glove Sizing: A New Perspective,” Human Factors, Vol. 57, No. 8, December 2015 (Table 6).

Compute the number of ways can select n element from N element of each of the following:

  1. n=2,N=5
  2. n=3,N=6
  3. n=5,N=20

On-the-job arrogance and task performance. Human Performance (Vol. 23, 2010) published the results of a study that found that arrogant workers are more likely to have poor performance ratings. Suppose that 15% of all full-time workers exhibit arrogant behaviors on the job and that 10% of all full-time workers will receive a poor performance rating. Also, assume that 5% of all full-time workers exhibit arrogant behaviors and receive a poor performance rating. Let A be the event that a full-time worker exhibits arrogant behavior. Let B be the event that a full-time worker will receive a poor performance rating.

a. Are the events A and B mutually exclusive? Explain.

b. Find P(B/A).

c. Are the events A and B independent? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free