Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Evaluating the performance of quality inspectors. The performance of quality inspectors affects both the quality of outgoing products and the cost of the products. A product that passes inspection is assumed to meet quality standards; a product that fails inspection may be reworked, scrapped, or reinspected. Quality engineers at an electric company evaluated performances of inspectors in judging the quality of solder joints by comparing each inspector’s classifications of a set of 153 joints with the consensus evaluation of a panel of experts. The results for a particular inspector are shown in the table. One of the 153 solder joints was selected at random.

Committee’s judgment joint

Joint Acceptable

joint Rejectable

Joint Acceptable

101

10

joint Rejectable

23

19

a. What is the probability that the inspector judged the joint to be acceptable? That the committee judged the joint to be acceptable?

b. What is the probability that both the inspector and the committee judged the joint to be acceptable? That neither judged the joint to be acceptable?

c. What is the probability that the inspector and the committee disagreed? Agreed?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. The probability is 0.81 and 0.73.
  2. The probability is 0.12 and 0.66.
  3. The probability that the inspector and the committee disagreed is 0.78.

Step by step solution

01

Important formula

The formula for probability areP=favourableoutcomestotaloutcomes

02

Find the probability that the inspector judged the joint to be acceptable.

Here, IA=the inspector judged the joint to be acceptable.

IR= the inspector judged the joint to be rejectable.

CA=the committee judged the joint to be acceptable.

CR= the committee judged the joint to be rejectable.

P(IA)=101+23153=124153=0.81

P(CA)=101+10153=111153=0.73

Thus, the probability is 0.81 and 0.73.

03

Determine the probability that both the inspector and the committee judged the joint to be acceptable. 

P(IRCR)=19153=0.12

P(IACA)=101153=0.66

Hence, the probability is 0.12 and 0.66.

04

Find the probability that the inspector and the committee disagreed.

P(AGREE)=P(IRCR)+P(IACA)=0.66+0.12=0.78

Therefore, the probability that the inspector and the committee disagreed is 0.78.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Who prepares your tax return? As part of a study on income tax compliance (Behavioral Research and Accounting, January 2015), researchers sampled 270 adults at a shopping mall and asked each: “Who usually prepares your tax return?” Their answers (and frequency of responses) are shown in the table (p. 170). Use the information in the table to estimate the probability that a randomly selected adult uses a friend, relative, or professional to prepare his or her income tax return.

Table for Exercise 3.16

Response

Frequency

You

100

Your spouse

16

Equally with spouse

7

Friend or relative

31

Professional help

114

Not required to file

2

TOTAL

270

Source: S. Bhattacharjee, K. Moreno, and D. Salbador, “The Impact of Multiple Tax Returns on Tax Compliance Behavior,” Behavioral Research and Accounting, Vol. 27, No. 1, January 2015 (from Table 1).

Study of why EMS workers leave the job.Refer to the Journal of Allied Health(Fall 2011) study of why emergencymedical service (EMS) workers leave the profession,Exercise 3.45 (p. 182). Recall that in a sample of 244former EMS workers, 127 were fully compensated whileon the job, 45 were partially compensated, and 72 hadnon-compensated volunteer positions. Also, the numbersof EMS workers who left because of retirement were 7 forfully compensated workers, 11 for partially compensatedworkers, and 10 for no compensated volunteers.

a.Given that the former EMS worker was fully compensatedwhile on the job, estimate the probability that theworker left the EMS profession due to retirement.

b.Given that the former EMS worker had a non-compensatedvolunteer position, estimate the probabilitythat the worker left the EMS profession due toretirement.

c.Are the events {a former EMS worker was fully compensatedon the job} and {a former EMS worker left thejob due to retirement} independent? Explain.

Three fair coins are tossed and either heads(H) or tails(T) are observed for each coin.

  1. List the sample points for the experiment.
  2. Assign probabilities to the sample points.
  3. Determine the probability of observing each of the following events:

A= {Three heads are observed}

B= {Exactly two heads are observed}

C= {At least two heads are observed}

Scrap rate of machine parts. A press produces parts used in the manufacture of large-screen plasma televisions. If the press is correctly adjusted, it produces parts with a scrap rate of 5%. If it is not adjusted correctly, it produces scrap at a 50% rate. From past company records, the machine is known to be correctly adjusted 90% of the time. A quality-control inspector randomly selects one part from those recently produced by the press and discovers it is defective. What is the probability that the machine is incorrectly adjusted?

Home modifications for wheelchair users. The American Journal of Public Health (January 2002) reported on a study of elderly wheelchair users who live at home. A sample of 306 wheelchair users, age 65 or older, were surveyed about whether they had an injurious fall during the year and whether their home features any one of five structural modifications: bathroom modifications, widened doorways/hallways, kitchen modifications, installed railings, and easy-open doors. The responses are summarized the accompanying table. Suppose we select, at random, one of the 306 surveyed wheelchair users.

a. Find the probability that the wheelchair user had an injurious fall.

b. Find the probability that the wheelchair user had all five features installed in the home.

c. Find the probability that the wheelchair user had no falls and none of the features installed in the home.

d. Given the wheelchair user had all five features installed, what is the probability that the user had an injurious fall?

e. Given the wheelchair user had none of the features installed, what is the probability that the user had an injurious fall?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free