Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Question: Ambiance of 5-star hotels. Although invisible and intangible, ambient conditions such as air quality , temperature , odor/aroma , music , noise level , and overall image may affect guests’ satisfaction with their stay at a hotel. A study in the Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management (Vol. 24, 2015) was designed to assess the effect of each of these ambient factors on customer satisfaction with the hotel . Using a survey, researchers collected data for a sample of 422 guests at 5-star hotels. All variables were measured as an average of several 5-point questionnaire responses. The results of the multiple regression are summarized in the table on the next page.

  1. Write the equation of a first-order model for hotel image as a function of the six ambient conditions.
  2. Give a practical interpretation of each of the b-estimates shown.
  3. A 99% confidence interval for is (.350, .576). Give a practical interpretation of this result.
  4. Interpret the value of adjusted .
  5. Is there sufficient evidence that the overall model is statistically useful for predicting hotel image ? Test using a = .01.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(A) The equation for the hotel isy=β0+β1x1+β2x2+β3x3+β4x4+β5x5+β6x6+ε

(B) Overall, all the beta values are positive indicating a positive impact on their overall stay at the hotel, however the beta values are very low meaning that the hotel has a lot to improve upon.

(C) 99% confidence interval for β6 is (0.350, 0.576) meaning that we are sure to conclude that the value of β6 lies within the interval (0.350, 0.576) with 99% accuracy.

(D) The value of adjusted R2 is 0.501 which means that around 50% variation in the variable is explained by the independent variables. The value indicates that the variables are not the best fit to the data.

(E) At least one of the parameters β1,β2,...,β6 is non zero. We have sufficient evidence to conclude that the overall model is not statistically useful to predict hotel image.

Step by step solution

01

Step-by-Step Solution  Step 1: first order model equation

The first order model for the hotel image(Y) as a function of the six ambient conditions can be written as

y=β0+β1x1+β2x2+β3x3+β4x4+β5x5+β6x6+ε

Where,

β1,β2,β3,β4,β5are the model parameters

X1is air quality

X2is temperature

x3is odor/aroma

x4is music

x5is noise level

x6is overall image

Therefore, the equation for the hotel isy=β0+β1x1+β2x2+β3x3+β4x4+β5x5+β6x6+ε

02

Interpretation of beta values

The values forx1=0.122,x2=0.018,x3=0.124,x4=0.119,x5=0.101andx6=0.463which can be interpreted as

ForX1, the value 0.122 indicates that since it’s a positive value, the guests are satisfied with air quality however, a lower value indicates that there is a lot to improve in for the hotel.

Forlocalid="1651776167603" x2 , the value 0.018 indicates that since it’s a positive value, the guests are satisfied with temperature however, it’s a very low value indicates that there is a lot to improve in for the hotel.

Forlocalid="1651776182169">x3, the value 0.124 indicates that since it’s a positive value, the guests are satisfied with air odor/aroma around the hotel, however, a lower value indicates that there is a lot to improve in for the hotel.

Forlocalid="1651776192792" x4, the value 0.119 indicates that since it’s a positive value, the guests are satisfied with music however, a lower value indicates that there is a lot to improve in for the hotel.

Forlocalid="1651776110861" x5, the value 0.101 indicates that since it’s a positive value, the guests are satisfied with air noise level however, a lower value indicates that there is a lot to improve in for the hotel. The hotel can promote noise reducing events and activities around the hotel.

Forlocalid="1651776097046" x6, the value 0.463 indicates that since it’s a positive value, the guests are satisfied with their overall stay at the hotel, a lower value indicates that there is a lot to improve in for the hotel.

Overall, all the beta values are positive indicating a positive impact on their overall stay at the hotel, however the beta values are very low meaning that the hotel has a lot to improve upon.

03

Confidence interval for  β6

99% confidence interval for β6 is (0.350, 0.576) meaning that we are sure to conclude that the value of β6 lies within the interval (0.350, 0.576) with 99% accuracy. Even the value of x6 estimate calculated after the research is 0.463 which lies within the interval.

04

Step 4: R2and adjusted R2

The value of R2 is 0.508 which means that around 50.8% of the variation in the variables is explained by the model. The value of 50.8% is not very high indicating that the model might not be a good fit for the data.

The value of adjusted R2 is 0.501 which means that around 50% variation in the variable is explained by the independent variables. The value indicates that the variables are not the best fit to the data.

05

Overall significance of the model

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose you fit the model y =β0+β1x1+β1x22+β3x2+β4x1x2+εto n = 25 data points with the following results:

β^0=1.26,β^1= -2.43,β^2=0.05,β^3=0.62,β^4=1.81sβ^1=1.21,sβ^2=0.16,sβ^3=0.26, sβ^4=1.49SSE=0.41 and R2=0.83

  1. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that at least one of the parameters b1, b2, b3, or b4 is nonzero? Test using a = .05.

  2. Test H0: β1 = 0 against Ha: β1 < 0. Use α = .05.

  3. Test H0: β2 = 0 against Ha: β2 > 0. Use α = .05.

  4. Test H0: β3 = 0 against Ha: β3 ≠ 0. Use α = .05.

Assertiveness and leadership. Management professors at Columbia University examined the relationship between assertiveness and leadership (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, February 2007). The sample represented 388 people enrolled in a full-time MBA program. Based on answers to a questionnaire, the researchers measured two variables for each subject: assertiveness score (x) and leadership ability score (y). A quadratic regression model was fit to the data, with the following results:

a. Conduct a test of overall model utility. Useα=0.05 .

b. The researchers hypothesized that leadership ability increases at a decreasing rate with assertiveness. Set up the null and alternative hypotheses to test this theory.

  1. Use the reported results to conduct the test, part b. Give your conclusion(atα=0.05 )in the words of the problem.

Question: Adverse effects of hot-water runoff. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) wants to determine whether the hot-water runoff from a particular power plant located near a large gulf is having an adverse effect on the marine life in the area. The goal is to acquire a prediction equation for the number of marine animals located at certain designated areas, or stations, in the gulf. Based on past experience, the EPA considered the following environmental factors as predictors for the number of animals at a particular station:

X1 = Temperature of water (TEMP)

X2 = Salinity of water (SAL)

X3 = Dissolved oxygen content of water (DO)

X4 = Turbidity index, a measure of the turbidity of the water (TI)

x5 = Depth of the water at the station (ST_DEPTH)

x6 = Total weight of sea grasses in sampled area (TGRSWT)

As a preliminary step in the construction of this model, the EPA used a stepwise regression procedure to identify the most important of these six variables. A total of 716 samples were taken at different stations in the gulf, producing the SPSS printout shown below. (The response measured was y, the logarithm of the number of marine animals found in the sampled area.)

a. According to the SPSS printout, which of the six independent variables should be used in the model? (Use α = .10.)

b. Are we able to assume that the EPA has identified all the important independent variables for the prediction of y? Why?

c. Using the variables identified in part a, write the first-order model with interaction that may be used to predict y.

d. How would the EPA determine whether the model specified in part c is better than the first-order model?

e.Note the small value of R2. What action might the EPA take to improve the model?

Question: Manipulating rates of return with stock splits. Some firms have been accused of using stock splits to manipulate their stock prices before being acquired by another firm. An article in Financial Management (Winter 2008) investigated the impact of stock splits on long-run stock performance for acquiring firms. A simplified version of the model fit by the researchers follows:

E(y)=β0+β1x1+β2x2+β3x1x2

where

y = Firm’s 3-year buy-and-hold return rate (%)

x1 = {1 if stock split prior to acquisition, 0 if not}

x2 = {1 if firm’s discretionary accrual is high, 0 if discretionary accrual is low}

a. In terms of the β’s in the model, what is the mean buy and- hold return rate (BAR) for a firm with no stock split and a high discretionary accrual (DA)?

b. In terms of the β’s in the model, what is the mean BAR for a firm with no stock split and a low DA?

c. For firms with no stock split, find the difference between the mean BAR for firms with high and low DA. (Hint: Use your answers to parts a and b.)

d. Repeat part c for firms with a stock split.

e. Note that the differences, parts c and d, are not the same. Explain why this illustrates the notion of interaction between x1 and x2.

f. A test for H0: β3 = 0 yielded a p-value of 0.027. Using α = .05, interpret this result.

g. The researchers reported that the estimated values of both β2 and β3 are negative. Consequently, they conclude that “high-DA acquirers perform worse compared with low-DA acquirers. Moreover, the underperformance is even greater if high-DA acquirers have a stock split before acquisition.” Do you agree?

Suppose the mean value E(y) of a response y is related to the quantitative independent variables x1and x2

E(y)=2+x1-3x2-x1x2

a) Identify and interpret the slope forx2

b) Plot the linear relationship between E(y) andx2for role="math" localid="1649796003444" x1=0,1,2, whererole="math" localid="1649796025582" 1x23

c) How would you interpret the estimated slopes?

d) Use the lines you plotted in part b to determine the changes in E(y) for eachrole="math" localid="1649796051071" x1=0,1,2.

e) Use your graph from part b to determine how much E(y) changes whenrole="math" localid="1649796075921" 3x15androle="math" localid="1649796084395" 1x23.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free