Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Question: Shopping on Black Friday. Refer to the International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management (Vol. 39, 2011) study of shopping on Black Friday (the day after Thanksgiving), Exercise 6.16 (p. 340). Recall that researchers conducted interviews with a sample of 38 women shopping on Black Friday to gauge their shopping habits. Two of the variables measured for each shopper were age (x) and number of years shopping on Black Friday (y). Data on these two variables for the 38 shoppers are listed in the accompanying table.

  1. Fit the quadratic model, E(y)=β0+β1x+β2x2, to the data using statistical software. Give the prediction equation.
  2. Conduct a test of the overall adequacy of the model. Use α=0.01.
  3. Conduct a test to determine if the relationship between age (x) and number of years shopping on Black Friday (y) is best represented by a linear or quadratic function. Use α=0.01.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Answer:

  1. The prediction equation here becomesy=21.50519+1.877438x+0.027x2
  2. At 99% confidence interval
  3. At 99% level, β2=0which means the model will be best represented by a linear function.

Step by step solution

01

Prediction equation

Age(y)

Years (x)

x2

32

5

25

27

3

9

40

12

144

62

35

1225

47

20

400

53

30

900

24

8

64

27

2

4

47

24

576

40

25

625

45

11

121

22

11

121

25

5

25

60

35

1225

22

3

9

50

15

225

70

22

484

50

10

100

21

6

36

21

5

25

52

10

100

40

18

324

38

5

25

56

8

64

60

5

25

35

15

225

50

25

625

56

10

100

20

2

4

20

4

16

21

4

16

22

5

25

50

10

100

30

6

36

28

16

256

25

7

49

30

6

36

49

30

900

Using excel, the output generated is

SUMMARY OUTPUT

















Regression Statistics








Multiple R

0.668369








R Square

0.446718








Adjusted R Square

0.415102








Standard Error

11.1575








Observations

38

















ANOVA









df

SS

MS

F

Significance F




Regression

2

3517.937

1758.968

14.12942

3.17E-05




Residual

35

4357.142

124.4898






Total

37

7875.079












Coefficients

Standard Error

t Stat

P-value

Lower 95%

Upper 95%

Lower 95.0%

Upper 95.0%

Intercept

21.50519

5.010678

4.291872

0.000133

11.33297

31.67741

11.33297

31.67741

Years (x)

1.877438

0.775442

2.42112

0.020796

0.303207

3.451668

0.303207

3.451668

x2

-0.0257

0.021877

-1.17481

0.248002

-0.07011

0.018711

-0.07011

0.018711

The prediction equation here becomes Therefore,β1β20

02

Overall goodness of fit

H0:β1=β2=0

Ha:At least one of the parameters β1orβ2is non zero

Here, F test statistic localid="1649834135544" =SSEn-k+1=14.12942

H0is rejected if p-value <α. For α=0.01, since 0.0000317 < 0.01

Sufficient evidence to reject H0 at 99% confidence interval.

Therefore,β1β20

03

Significance of β2

H0:β2=0, while,role="math" localid="1649834767365" Ha:β20

The p-value ofβ3is 0.248002 whileα=0.01

H0is rejected if P-value <α. For ,α=0.01 since 0.248002 > 0.01

Not sufficient evidence to reject H0at 95% confidence interval.

Therefore, β2=0which means the model will be best represented by a linear function.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question: Company donations to charity. The amount a company donates to a charitable organization is often restricted by financial inflexibility at the firm. One measure of financial inflexibility is the ratio of restricted assets to total firm assets. A study published in the Journal of Management Accounting Research (Vol. 27, 2015) investigated the link between donation amount and this ratio. Data were collected on donations to 115,333 charities over a recent 10-year period, resulting in a sample of 419,225 firm-years. The researchers fit the quadratic model,E(y)=β0+β1x+β2x2, where y = natural logarithm of total donations to charity by a firm in a year and x = ratio of restricted assets to the firm’s total assets in the previous year. [Note: This model is a simplified version of the actual model fit by the researchers.]

  1. The researchers’ theory is that as a firm’s restricted assets increase, donations will initially increase. However, there is a point at which donations will not only diminish, but also decline as restricted assets increase. How should the researchers use the model to test this theory?
  2. The results of the multiple regression are shown in the table below. Use this information to test the researchers’ theory at. What do you conclude?

Question: Write a second-order model relating the mean of y, E(y), to

a. one quantitative independent variable

b. two quantitative independent variables

c. three quantitative independent variables [Hint: Include allpossible two- way cross-product terms and squared terms.]

Question: Suppose the mean value E(y) of a response y is related to the quantitative independent variables x1and x2

E(y)=2+x1-3x2-x1x2

a. Identify and interpret the slope forx2.

b. Plot the linear relationship between E(y) andx2forx1=0,1,2, where.

c. How would you interpret the estimated slopes?

d. Use the lines you plotted in part b to determine the changes in E(y) for each x1=0,1,2.

e. Use your graph from part b to determine how much E(y) changes when3x15and1x23.

Consider the following data that fit the quadratic modelE(y)=β0+β1x+β2x2:

a. Construct a scatterplot for this data. Give the prediction equation and calculate R2based on the model above.

b. Interpret the value ofR2.

c. Justify whether the overall model is significant at the 1% significance level if the data result into a p-value of 0.000514.

Question: Manipulating rates of return with stock splits. Some firms have been accused of using stock splits to manipulate their stock prices before being acquired by another firm. An article in Financial Management (Winter 2008) investigated the impact of stock splits on long-run stock performance for acquiring firms. A simplified version of the model fit by the researchers follows:

E(y)=β0+β1x1+β2x2+β3x1x2

where

y = Firm’s 3-year buy-and-hold return rate (%)

x1 = {1 if stock split prior to acquisition, 0 if not}

x2 = {1 if firm’s discretionary accrual is high, 0 if discretionary accrual is low}

a. In terms of the β’s in the model, what is the mean buy and- hold return rate (BAR) for a firm with no stock split and a high discretionary accrual (DA)?

b. In terms of the β’s in the model, what is the mean BAR for a firm with no stock split and a low DA?

c. For firms with no stock split, find the difference between the mean BAR for firms with high and low DA. (Hint: Use your answers to parts a and b.)

d. Repeat part c for firms with a stock split.

e. Note that the differences, parts c and d, are not the same. Explain why this illustrates the notion of interaction between x1 and x2.

f. A test for H0: β3 = 0 yielded a p-value of 0.027. Using α = .05, interpret this result.

g. The researchers reported that the estimated values of both β2 and β3 are negative. Consequently, they conclude that “high-DA acquirers perform worse compared with low-DA acquirers. Moreover, the underperformance is even greater if high-DA acquirers have a stock split before acquisition.” Do you agree?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free