Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

When a multiple regression model is used for estimating the mean of the dependent variable and for predicting a new value of y, which will be narrower—the confidence interval for the mean or the prediction interval for the new y-value? Why?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Confidence interval is narrower than the prediction interval because Prediction intervals must account for both the uncertainty in estimating the population mean, plus the random variation of the individual values. So a prediction interval is always wider than a confidence interval. Also, the prediction interval will not converge to a single value as the sample size increases.

Step by step solution

01

Difference in confidence and prediction interval

The prediction interval predicts in what range a future individual observation will fall, while a confidence interval shows the likely range of values associated with some statistical parameter of the data, such as the population mean.

02

Narrower of the two

Confidence interval is narrower than the prediction interval because Prediction intervals must account for both the uncertainty in estimating the population mean, plus the random variation of the individual values. So a prediction interval is always wider than a confidence interval. Also, the prediction interval will not converge to a single value as the sample size increases.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question: Glass as a waste encapsulant. Because glass is not subject to radiation damage, encapsulation of waste in glass is considered to be one of the most promising solutions to the problem of low-level nuclear waste in the environment. However, chemical reactions may weaken the glass. This concern led to a study undertaken jointly by the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Florida and the U.S. Department of Energy to assess the utility of glass as a waste encapsulant. Corrosive chemical solutions (called corrosion baths) were prepared and applied directly to glass samples containing one of three types of waste (TDS-3A, FE, and AL); the chemical reactions were observed over time. A few of the key variables measured were

y = Amount of silicon (in parts per million) found in solution at end of experiment. (This is both a measure of the degree of breakdown in the glass and a proxy for the amount of radioactive species released into the environment.)

x1 = Temperature (°C) of the corrosion bath

x2 = 1 if waste type TDS-3A, 0 if not

x3 = 1 if waste type FE, 0 if not

(Waste type AL is the base level.) Suppose we want to model amount y of silicon as a function of temperature (x1) and type of waste (x2, x3).

a. Write a model that proposes parallel straight-line relationships between amount of silicon and temperature, one line for each of the three waste types.

b. Add terms for the interaction between temperature and waste type to the model of part a.

c. Refer to the model of part b. For each waste type, give the slope of the line relating amount of silicon to temperature.

e. Explain how you could test for the presence of temperature–waste type interaction.

Can money spent on gifts buy love? Refer to the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 45, 2009) study of whether buying gifts truly buys love, Exercise 9.9 (p. 529). Recall those study participants were randomly assigned to play the role of gift-giver or gift-receiver. Gift-receivers were asked to provide the level of appreciation (measured on a 7-point scale where 1 = “not at all” and 7 = “to a great extent”) they had for the last birthday gift they received from a loved one. Gift-givers were asked to recall the last birthday gift they gave to a loved one and to provide the level of appreciation the loved one had for the gift.

  1. Write a dummy variable regression model that will allow the researchers to compare the average level of appreciation for birthday gift-giverswith the average for birthday gift-receivers.
  2. Express each of the model’s β parameters in terms ofand.
  3. The researchers hypothesize that the average level of appreciation is higher for birthday gift-givers than for birthday gift-receivers. Explain how to test this hypothesis using the regression model.

Cooling method for gas turbines. Refer to the Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power (January 2005) study of a high-pressure inlet fogging method for a gas turbine engine, Exercise 12.19 (p. 726). Recall that you fit a first-order model for heat rate (y) as a function of speed (x1) , inlet temperature (x2) , exhaust temperature (x3) , cycle pressure ratio (x4) , and airflow rate (x5) . A Minitab printout with both a 95% confidence interval for E(y) and prediction interval for y for selected values of the x’s is shown below.

a. Interpret the 95% prediction interval for y in the words of the problem.

b. Interpret the 95% confidence interval forE(y)in the words of the problem.

c. Will the confidence interval for E(y) always be narrower than the prediction interval for y? Explain.

The Minitab printout below was obtained from fitting the modely=β0+β1x1+β2x2+β3x1x2+εto n = 15 data points.

a) What is the prediction equation?

b) Give an estimate of the slope of the line relating y to x1 when x2 =10 .

c) Plot the prediction equation for the case when x2 =1 . Do this twice more on the same graph for the cases when x2 =3 and x2 =5 .

d) Explain what it means to say that x1and x2interact. Explain why your graph of part c suggests that x1and x2interact.

e) Specify the null and alternative hypotheses you would use to test whetherx1andx2interact.

f)Conduct the hypothesis test of part e using α=0.01.

Question: Write a regression model relating E(y) to a qualitative independent variable that can assume three levels. Interpret all the terms in the model.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free