Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose you fit the regression model Ey=β0+β1x1+β2x2+β3x2+β4x1x2+β5x1x222 to n = 35 data points and wish to test the null hypothesisH0:β4=β5=0

  1. State the alternative hypothesis.
  2. Explain in detail how to compute the F-statistic needed to test the null hypothesis.
  3. What are the numerator and denominator degrees of freedom associated with the F-statistic in part b?
  4. Give the rejection region for the test if α = .05.

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. The alternate hypothesis to test the significance of interaction terms would be Ha: At least one of the parameters β4 or β5 is nonzero.
  2. The F-statistic to check the goodness of fit of the model can be computed byF test statistic =.SSEn-k+1.
  3. In part b, the degrees of freedom for numerator is (n-k) while the degree of freedom for denominator is [n-(k+1)].
  4. When α = 0.05, the rejection region for the significance of interaction terms can be defined when the t-statistic < t0.025, n-1.

Step by step solution

01

Alternate hypothesis

The alternate hypothesis to test the significance of interaction terms would be Ha: At least one of the parameters β4 or β5 is nonzero.

02

F-statistic

The F-statistic to check the goodness of fit of the model can be computed by

F test statistic =SSEn-k+1 .

03

Degrees of freedom

In part b, the degrees of freedom for numerator is (n-k) while the degree of freedom for denominator is [n-(k+1)].

04

Rejection region

When α = 0.05, the rejection region for the significance of interaction terms can be defined when the t-statistic < t0.025, n-1.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Commercial refrigeration systems. The role of maintenance in energy saving in commercial refrigeration was the topic of an article in the Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering (Vol. 18, 2012). The authors provided the following illustration of data relating the efficiency (relative performance) of a refrigeration system to the fraction of total charges for cooling the system required for optimal performance. Based on the data shown in the graph (next page), hypothesize an appropriate model for relative performance (y) as a function of fraction of charge (x). What is the hypothesized sign (positive or negative) of the β2parameter in the model?

The first-order model E(y)=β0+β1x1was fit to n = 19 data points. A residual plot for the model is provided below. Is the need for a quadratic term in the model evident from the residual plot? Explain.



Factors that impact an auditor’s judgment. A study was conducted to determine the effects of linguistic delivery style and client credibility on auditors’ judgments (Advances in Accounting and Behavioural Research, 2004). Two hundred auditors from Big 5 accounting firms were each asked to perform an analytical review of a fictitious client’s financial statement. The researchers gave the auditors different information on the client’s credibility and linguistic delivery style of the client’s explanation. Each auditor then provided an assessment of the likelihood that the client-provided explanation accounted for the fluctuation in the financial statement. The three variables of interest—credibility (x1), linguistic delivery style (x2) , and likelihood (y) —were all measured on a numerical scale. Regression analysis was used to fit the interaction model,y=β0+β1x1+β2x2+β3x1x2+ε . The results are summarized in the table at the bottom of page.

a) Interpret the phrase client credibility and linguistic delivery style interact in the words of the problem.

b) Give the null and alternative hypotheses for testing the overall adequacy of the model.

c) Conduct the test, part b, using the information in the table.

d) Give the null and alternative hypotheses for testing whether client credibility and linguistic delivery style interact.

e) Conduct the test, part d, using the information in the table.

f) The researchers estimated the slope of the likelihood–linguistic delivery style line at a low level of client credibility 1x1 = 222. Obtain this estimate and interpret it in the words of the problem.

g) The researchers also estimated the slope of the likelihood–linguistic delivery style line at a high level of client credibility 1x1 = 462. Obtain this estimate and interpret it in the words of the problem.

Reality TV and cosmetic surgery. Refer to the Body Image: An International Journal of Research (March 2010) study of the impact of reality TV shows on a college student’s decision to undergo cosmetic surgery, Exercise 12.17 (p. 725). Recall that the data for the study (simulated based on statistics reported in the journal article) are saved in the file. Consider the interaction model, , where y = desire to have cosmetic surgery (25-point scale), = {1 if male, 0 if female}, and = impression of reality TV (7-point scale). The model was fit to the data and the resulting SPSS printout appears below.

a.Give the least squares prediction equation.

b.Find the predicted level of desire (y) for a male college student with an impression-of-reality-TV-scale score of 5.

c.Conduct a test of overall model adequacy. Use a= 0.10.

d.Give a practical interpretation of R2a.

e.Give a practical interpretation of s.

f.Conduct a test (at a = 0.10) to determine if gender (x1) and impression of reality TV show (x4) interact in the prediction of level of desire for cosmetic surgery (y).

Question: Refer to Exercise 12.82.

a. Write a complete second-order model that relates E(y) to the quantitative variable.

b. Add the main effect terms for the qualitative variable (at three levels) to the model of part a.

c. Add terms to the model of part b to allow for interaction between the quantitative and qualitative independent variables.

d. Under what circumstances will the response curves of the model have the same shape but different y-intercepts?

e. Under what circumstances will the response curves of the model be parallel lines?

f. Under what circumstances will the response curves of the model be identical?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free