Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Personality traits and job performance. Refer to the Journal of Applied Psychology (January 2011) study of the determinants of task performance, Exercise 12.94 (p. 766). In addition to x1 = conscientiousness score and x2 = {1 if highly complex job, 0 if not}, the researchers also used x3 = emotional stability score, x4 = organizational citizenship behavior score, and x5 = counterproductive work behavior score to model y = task performance score. One of their concerns is the level of multicollinearity in the data. Below is a matrix of correlations for all possible pairs of independent variables. Based on this information, do you detect a moderate or high level of multicollinearity? If so, what are your recommendations?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Multicollinearity is checked by checking the correlation amongst the independent variables. If there is high correlation amongst any two independent variables, it is said that the problem of multicollinearity exists in the model.

Step by step solution

01

Multicollinearity check

Multicollinearity is checked by checking the correlation amongst the independent variables. If there is high correlation amongst any two independent variables, it is said that the problem of multicollinearity exists in the model.

02

Application of multicollinearity check 

Based on the table provided in the question, there is a moderate level of multicollinearity between emotional stability (x3) and conscientiousness score (x1) since the correlation coefficient value of 0.62 and between organizational citizenship (x4) and counterproductive work (x5) since the correlation coefficient value is -0.62. For all the other variables the correlation coefficient value is less than 0.25 indicating very low level of multicollinearity.

03

Recommendations to avoid multicollinearity

Recommendations to avoid multicollinearity are

Drop one or more correlated variables from the model

Do not make inferences about E(y) or future y-values to values of x’s that fall outside the range of the sample data.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question: Write a first-order model relating to

  1. Two quantitative independent variables.
  2. Four quantitative independent variables.
  3. Five quantitative independent variables.

Question: Orange juice demand study. A chilled orange juice warehousing operation in New York City was experiencing too many out-of-stock situations with its 96-ounce containers. To better understand current and future demand for this product, the company examined the last 40 days of sales, which are shown in the table below. One of the company’s objectives is to model demand, y, as a function of sale day, x (where x = 1, 2, 3, c, 40).

  1. Construct a scatterplot for these data.
  2. Does it appear that a second-order model might better explain the variation in demand than a first-order model? Explain.
  3. Fit a first-order model to these data.
  4. Fit a second-order model to these data.
  5. Compare the results in parts c and d and decide which model better explains variation in demand. Justify your choice.

Assertiveness and leadership. Management professors at Columbia University examined the relationship between assertiveness and leadership (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, February 2007). The sample represented 388 people enrolled in a full-time MBA program. Based on answers to a questionnaire, the researchers measured two variables for each subject: assertiveness score (x) and leadership ability score (y). A quadratic regression model was fit to the data, with the following results:

a. Conduct a test of overall model utility. Useα=0.05 .

b. The researchers hypothesized that leadership ability increases at a decreasing rate with assertiveness. Set up the null and alternative hypotheses to test this theory.

  1. Use the reported results to conduct the test, part b. Give your conclusion(atα=0.05 )in the words of the problem.

Suppose you used Minitab to fit the model y=β0+β1x1+β2x2+ε

to n = 15 data points and obtained the printout shown below.

  1. What is the least squares prediction equation?

  2. Find R2and interpret its value.

  3. Is there sufficient evidence to indicate that the model is useful for predicting y? Conduct an F-test using α = .05.

  4. Test the null hypothesis H0: β1= 0 against the alternative hypothesis Ha: β1≠ 0. Test using α = .05. Draw the appropriate conclusions.

  5. Find the standard deviation of the regression model and interpret it.

Can money spent on gifts buy love? Refer to the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 45, 2009) study of whether buying gifts truly buys love, Exercise 9.9 (p. 529). Recall those study participants were randomly assigned to play the role of gift-giver or gift-receiver. Gift-receivers were asked to provide the level of appreciation (measured on a 7-point scale where 1 = “not at all” and 7 = “to a great extent”) they had for the last birthday gift they received from a loved one. Gift-givers were asked to recall the last birthday gift they gave to a loved one and to provide the level of appreciation the loved one had for the gift.

  1. Write a dummy variable regression model that will allow the researchers to compare the average level of appreciation for birthday gift-giverswith the average for birthday gift-receivers.
  2. Express each of the model’s β parameters in terms ofand.
  3. The researchers hypothesize that the average level of appreciation is higher for birthday gift-givers than for birthday gift-receivers. Explain how to test this hypothesis using the regression model.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free