Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Refer to the Academy of Management Journal(Aug. 2008) study of corporateacquisitions from 1980 to 2000, Exercise 2.12 (p. 74). Thedata file includes the number of firms with at least one

acquisition each year.

a.Construct either a dot plot or a stem-and-leaf display

for the annual number of firms with at least one

acquisition.

b.On the graph, part a, highlight (or circle) the values for

the years 1996–2000. Do you detect a pattern? If so,

what conclusion can you draw from the data?

Year

Number of firms sampled

Number with acquisitions

1980

1963

18

1990

2197

350

2000

2778

748

Total

6938

1116

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. The key of the stem and leaf display are defined as 28.

b. The value of the year 1996 to 2000 is 28. Therefore years 1996- 2000 had the highest number of firms with at least one acquisition.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Given that the data file includes the number of firms with at least one acquisitions. The study of corporate acquisitions from to define in tabulation form.

02

Construct dot plot or stem and leaf display

a. The stem and leaf display will be given by

Number of firms sampled

Stem

Leaf

1963

19

19

2197

21

97

2778

27

78

The stem and leaf display with one number(18) with acquisitions. Then the key is taken from the stem and leaf display to given by 2|8=28.

03

Highlight the value of year 1996 to 2000. And also detect pattern and conclusions

b. The value of the year 1996 to 2000 is 28. The detected pattern follows the stem and leaf display graph and this interval of the year the key is defined 28.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Nuclear power plants.According to the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), 62 nuclear power plants were operating in the United States in 2015. The table at top of the next column lists the 30 states that operate nuclear power

plants, the number of plants in each state, and whether the state has passed legislation supporting nuclear energy expansion (regulated) or not (deregulated).

a.Find the mean, median, and mode of the number of power plants per state. Interpret these values.

b.Repeat part afor the regulated states only.

c.Repeat part afor the deregulated states only.

d.Compare the results, parts band c.What inference can you make about the impact that state regulation has on the number of nuclear power plants?

e.Eliminate the state with the largest number of power plants from the data set and repeat part a.What effect does dropping this measurement have on the measures of central tendency found in part a?

f.Arrange the 30 values in the table from lowest to highest. Next, eliminate the lowest two values and the highest two values from the data set and find the mean of the remaining data values. The result is called a 10% trimmed meanbecause it is calculated after removing the highest 10% and the lowest 10% of the data values. What advantages does a trimmed mean have over the regular arithmetic mean?

State

Status

Number of Power Plants

Alabama

Regulated

2

Arizona

Regulated

1

Arkansas

Regulated

1

California

Regulated

1

Connecticut

Deregulated

1

Florida

Regulated

3

Georgia

Regulated

2

Illinois

Deregulated

6

Iowa

Deregulated

1

Kansas

Regulated

1

Louisiana

Regulated

2

Maryland

Deregulated

1

Massachusetts

Deregulated

1

Michigan

Deregulated

3

Minnesota

Regulated

2

Mississippi

Regulated

1

Missouri

Regulated

1

Nebraska

Regulated

2

New Hampshire

Deregulated

1

New Jersey

Deregulated

3

New York

Deregulated

4

North Carolina

Regulated

3

Ohio

Deregulated

2

Pennsylvania

Deregulated

5

South Carolina

Regulated

4

Tennessee

Regulated

2

Texas

Deregulated

2

Virginia

Regulated

2

Washington

Regulated

1

Wisconsin

Deregulated

1

Performance ratings of government agencies.The U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) requires government agencies to produce annual performance and accounting reports (PARS) each year. A research team at George Mason University evaluated the quality of the PARS for 24 government agencies (The Public Manager, summer 2008). Evaluation scores ranged from 12 (lowest) to 60 (highest). The PARS evaluation scores for two consecutive years are shown in the next table.

a.Construct a scatterplot for the data. Do you detect atrend in the data?

b.Based on the graph, identify one or two agencies that hadgreater than expected PARS evaluation scores for year 2.

Give the percentage of measurements in a data set that are above and below each of the following percentiles:

a. 75th percentile

b. 50th percentile

c. 20th percentile

d. 84th percentile

Question: Lobster trap placement.The strategic placement of lobster traps is one of the keys to a successful lobster fisherman. An observational study of teams fishing for the red spiny lobster in Baja California Sur, Mexico, was conducted and the results were published in the Bulletin of Marine Science(April 2010). Two variables measured for each of eightteams from the Punta Abreojos (PA) fishing cooperativewere y= total catch of lobsters (in kilograms) during theseason and x= average percentage of traps allocated perday to exploring areas of unknown catch (called search frequency).These data are listed in the next table. Graph

the data in a scatterplot. What type of trend, if any, do you observe?

Total Catch

Search Frequency

2785

35

6535

21

6695

26

4891

29

4937

23

5727

17

7019

21

5735

20

Question: Hourly road accidents in India.An analysis of road accident data in India was undertaken, and the results were published in the Journal of Big Data(Vol. 2, 2015). For a particular cluster of roads, the hourly numbers of accidents totaled over a recent 5-year period are listed in the next table. (These results are adapted from a figure in the journal article.) Create a scatterplot of the data, with a number of accidents on the vertical axis and hours on the horizontal axis. What type of trend (if any) do you detect in the data?

Hour

Number

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

125

148

159

270

281

295

302

216

225

353

400

327

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free