Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Management system failures.The U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) is responsible for determining the root cause of industrial accidents (Process Safety Progress, December 2004). The accompanying table gives a breakdown of the root causes of 83 incidents caused by management system failures.

Management System Cause

Category

Number of Incidents

Engineering & Design

Procedures & Practices

Management & Oversight

Training & Communication

27

24

22

10

Total

83

a.Find the relative frequency of the number of incidents for each cause category.

b.Construct a Pareto diagram for the data.

c.From the Pareto diagram, identify the cause categories with the highest (and lowest) the relative frequency of incidents.

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. ED = 0.32, PP = 0.29, MO = 0.27, TC = 0.12

C. Highest = Engineering and Design

Lowest = Training and Communication

Step by step solution

01

 Step 1: Finding the relative Frequency

RelativeFrequency=FrequencyTotalFrequency

Engineering and Design (ED),

RelativeFrequency=2783=0.32

Procedures and Practices (PP),

RelativeFrequency=2483=0.29

Management and Oversight (MO),

RelativeFrequency=2283=0.27

Training and Communication (TC),

RelativeFrequency=1083=0.12

02

Constructing a Pareto Diagram

As the data is already in descending order and based on the relative frequencies above we can find the percentages.

ED = 32%

PP = 29%

MO = 27%

TC = 12%

Using this we will construct the Pareto diagram.

03

Identifying the category with the highest and lowest relative frequency of incidents

The category with the highest relative frequency of incidents is Engineering and Design (0.32).

The category with the lowest relative frequency of incidents is Training and Communication (0.12).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question: State SAT scores.Refer to Exercise 2.27 (p. 84) and the data on state SAT scores. Construct a scatterplot for the data, with the 2010 Math SAT score on the horizontal axis and the 2014 Math SAT score on the vertical axis. What type of trend do you detect?

State

2010 Math SAT

2014 Math SAT

Alabama

538

550

Alaska

503

513

Arizona

527

524

Arkansa

571

564

California

510

516

Wisconsin

608

603

Wyoming

599

565

STEM experiences for girls. The National Science Foundation (NSF) sponsored a study on girls’ participation in informal science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (STEM) programs. The results of the study were published in Cascading Influences: Long-Term Impacts of Informal STEM Experiences for Girls (March 2013). The researchers sampled 174 young women who recently participated in a STEM program. They used a pie chart to describe the geographic location (urban, suburban, or rural) of the STEM programs attended. Of the 174 STEM participants, 107 were in urban areas, 57 in suburban areas, and 10 in rural areas.

a. Determine the proportion of STEM participants from urban areas.

b. Determine the proportion of STEM participants from suburban areas.

c. Determine the proportion of STEM participants from rural areas.

d. Multiply each proportion in parts a—c by 360 to determine the pie slice size (in degrees) for each location.

e. Use the results, part d, to construct a pie chart for the geographic location of STEM participants.

f. Interpret the pie slice for urban areas.

g. Convert the pie chart into a bar graph. Which, in your opinion, is more informative?

Cable TV subscriptions and “cord cutters.” Has the increasing popularity of smartphones and video streaming over the Internet affected cable and satellite TV subscriptions? This was one of the questions of interest in a recent Pew Research Center survey (December 2015). Telephone (both landline and cell phone) interviews were conducted on a representative sample of 2,001 adults living in the United States. For this sample, 1,521 adults reported that they currently receive cable or satellite TV service at home, 180 revealed that they have never subscribed to cable/satellite TV service at home, and the remainder (300 adults) admitted that they are “cord cutters,” i.e., they canceled the cable/satellite TV service. The results are summarized in the Minitab pie chart shown.

a. According to the pie chart, what proportion of the adults in the sample currently have a cable/satellite TV subscription at home? Verify the accuracy of this proportion using the survey results.

b. Now consider only the 1,821 adults in the sample that have at one time or another subscribed to cable/satellite TV service. Create a graph that compares the proportions of adults who currently subscribe to cable/satellite TV service with the proportion who are “cord cutters.”

For each of the following data sets, compute xbar, s2, and s. If appropriate, specify the units in which your answers are expressed.

a.4, 6, 6, 5, 6, 7

b.- \(1, \)4, - \(3, \)0, - \(3, - \)6

c.3/5 %, 4/5 %, 2/5 %, 1/5 %, 1/16 %

d.Calculate the range of each data set in parts a–c.

Question: Hotels’ use of ecolabels.Refer to the Journal of Vacation Marketing(January 2016) study of travelers’ familiaritywith ecolabels used by hotels, Exercise 2.42 (p. 94). Recallthat a sample of 392 adult travelers were shown a list of6 different ecolabels, and asked, “How familiar are youwith this ecolabel, on a scale of 1 (not familiar at all) to5 (very familiar).” The mean and standard deviation ofthe responses for each ecolabel are provided in the table.Which of the ecolabels had the most variation in numericalresponses? Explain.

Ecolabel

Mean

Std. Dev.

Energy Star

4.44

0.82

TripAdvisor

3.57

1.38

Green Leaders Audubon

2.41

1.44

International U.S Green

2.28

1.39

Building Council Green Business

2.25

1.39

Green Key

2.01

1.30

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free