Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Financial incentives for college students. A study reported in Inside Higher Education News (May 22, 2006) found that financial incentives can improve low-income college students’ grades and retention. As part of their “Opening Doors” program, a Louisiana community college offered to pay students $1,000 per semester on the condition that they maintain at least half-time enrollment and at least a 2.0 grade point average (GPA).

a. About 61% of Opening Doors students enrolled full time as opposed to about 52% of traditional students. Identify the target parameter for this comparison.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. The target parameter of the comparison is\(\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right).\)

Step by step solution

01

Given information.

Financial incentives can improve low-income college student’s grades and retention.

The community college offered to pay $1000 per semester on condition that they maintain at least half-time enrollment and at least a GPA of 2.0.

02

State the condition required for valid large sample inference about \(\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right).\)                                                               \(\)

The condition required for valid large sample inference is given as follows:

  • The two samples are randomly selected in an independent manner from the two target populations.
  • The sample sizes \({n_1}\)and \({n_2}\)are both large so that the sampling distribution of \(\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right)\) will be approximately normal.
03

Identify the target parameter of this comparison

The comparison is that about 61% of Opening Doors students enrolled full-time as opposed to about 52% of traditional students.

According to the information of the comparison, \({\hat p_1}\)is the proportion of opening door students enrolled and \({\hat p_2}\) is the proportion of traditional students enrolled.

The proportion of opening door students enrolled is 61%.

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{{\hat p}_1} &= \frac{{61}}{{100}}\\ &= 0.61\end{aligned}\)

The proportion of traditional students enrolled is 52%.

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{{\hat p}_2} &= \frac{{52}}{{100}}\\ &= 0.52\end{aligned}\)

As we know that to compare two proportions, we need to consider the difference of population proportions. So, the target parameter is the difference of population proportions,\(\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right)\).

Hence, the target parameter of the comparison is \(\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right).\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Product failure behavior. An article in Hotwire (December 2002) discussed the length of time till the failure of a product produced at Hewlett Packard. At the end of the product’s lifetime, the time till failure is modeled using an exponential distribution with a mean of 500 thousand hours. In reliability jargon, this is known as the “wear-out” distribution for the product. During its normal (useful) life, assume the product’s time till failure is uniformly distributed over the range of 100 thousand to 1 million hours.

a. At the end of the product’s lifetime, find the probability that the product fails before 700 thousand hours.

b. During its normal (useful) life, find the probability that the product fails before 700 thousand hours.

c. Show that the probability of the product failing before 830 thousand hours is approximately the same for both the normal (useful) life distribution and the wear-out distribution.

Business sign conservation. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) lately issued new guidelines for maintaining and replacing business signs. Civil masterminds at North Carolina State University studied the effectiveness of colorful sign conservation practices developed to cleave to the new guidelines and published the results in the Journal of Transportation Engineering (June 2013). One portion of the study concentrated on the proportion of business signs that fail the minimal FHWA retro-reflectivity conditions. Of signs maintained by the. North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), .512 were supposed failures. Of signs maintained by. County- possessed roads in North Carolina, 328 were supposed. Failures. Conduct a test of the thesis to determine whether the true proportions of business signs that fail the minimal FHWA retro-reflectivity conditions differ depending on whether the signs are maintained by the NCDOT or by the county. Test using α = .05

Drug content assessment. Scientists at GlaxoSmithKlineMedicines Research Center used high-performance liquidchromatography (HPLC) to determine the amountof drug in a tablet produced by the company (Analytical

Chemistry, Dec. 15, 2009). Drug concentrations (measuredas a percentage) for 50 randomly selected tablets are listedin the table below and saved in the accompanying file.

a. Descriptive statistics for the drug concentrations areshown at the top of the XLSTAT printout on the nextpage. Use this information to assess whether the dataare approximately normal.

b. An XLSTAT normal probability plot follows. Use thisinformation to assess whether the data are approximatelynormal.

91.28 92.83 89.35 91.90 82.85 94.83 89.83 89.00 84.62

86.96 88.32 91.17 83.86 89.74 92.24 92.59 84.21 89.36

90.96 92.85 89.39 89.82 89.91 92.16 88.67 89.35 86.51

89.04 91.82 93.02 88.32 88.76 89.26 90.36 87.16 91.74

86.12 92.10 83.33 87.61 88.20 92.78 86.35 93.84 91.20

93.44 86.77 83.77 93.19 81.79

Descriptive statistics(Quantitative data)

Statistic

Content

Nbr.of Observation

50

Minimum

81.79

Maximum

94.83

1st Quartile

87.2725

Median

89.375

3rd Quartile

91.88

Mean

89.2906

Variance(n-1)

10.1343

Standard deviation(n-1)

3.1834

Given that xis a binomial random variable, compute P(x)for each of the following cases:

a. n= 7, x= 3, p= .5

b. n= 4, x= 3, p= .8

c. n= 15, x= 1, p= .1

A paired difference experiment produced the following results:

nd=38,x¯1=92,x¯2=95.5,d¯=-3.5,sd2=21

a. Determine the values zfor which the null hypothesis μ1μ2=0would be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis μ1μ2<0 Use .role="math" localid="1652704322912" α=.10

b. Conduct the paired difference test described in part a. Draw the appropriate conclusions.

c. What assumptions are necessary so that the paired difference test will be valid?

d. Find a90% confidence interval for the mean difference μd.

e. Which of the two inferential procedures, the confidence interval of part d or the test of the hypothesis of part b, provides more information about the differences between the population means?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free