Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A random sample of five pairs of observations were selected, one of each pair from a population with mean\({\mu _2}\), the other from a population with mean \({\mu _2}\).The data are shown in the accompanying table.

Pair

Value from population 1

Value from population 2

1

28

22

2

31

27

3

24

20

4

30

27

5

22

20

a. Test the null hypothesis \({H_0}:{\mu _d} = 0\) against\({H_0}:{\mu _d} \ne 0\), where\({\mu _d} = {\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\) . Compare \(\alpha = 0.05\)with the p-value of the test.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. There is no sufficient evidence to claim that the difference of the mean pairs is zero.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The number of pairs, \({n_d} = 5\).

The data set is given as follows:

Pair

Value from population 1

Value from population 2

1

28

22

2

31

27

3

24

20

4

30

27

5

22

20

02

State the paired difference test of hypothesis for \({\mu _d}.\)

The Student’s t-test statistic for the small sample is,

\(t = \frac{{\bar d - {D_0}}}{{{s_d}/\sqrt {{n_d}} }}\)

Where \(\bar d\) is the sample mean difference, \({s_d}\) is the sample standard deviation difference, and \({n_d}\) is the number of pairs.

03

Compute the mean and standard deviation of the given data set.

A random sample of five pairs of observations were selected, one of each pair from a population with\({\mu _1}\) and other with mean\({\mu _2}\).

The calculation table is given as follows:

Values from population 1

\(\left( {{x_i}} \right)\)

Values from population 2

\(\left( {{y_i}} \right)\)

\({d_i} = {x_i} - {y_i}\)

\(d_i^2\)

28

22

6

36

31

27

4

16

24

20

4

16

30

27

3

9

22

20

2

4

\(\sum\limits_{i = 1}^5 {{d_i}} = 19\)

\(\sum\limits_{i = 1}^5 {d_i^2} = 81\)

The mean of the difference of the two population is computed as follows:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}\bar d &= \frac{{\sum {{d_i}} }}{{{n_d}}}\\ &= \frac{{19}}{5}\\ &= 3.8\end{aligned}\)

The standard deviation of the difference of the two population is computed as follows:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{s_d} &= \sqrt {\frac{1}{{\left( {{n_d} - 1} \right)}}\left( {\sum {d_i^2} - \frac{{{{\left( {\sum {{d_i}} } \right)}^2}}}{{{n_d}}}} \right)} \\ &= \sqrt {\frac{1}{{\left( {5 - 1} \right)}}\left( {81 - \frac{{{{\left( {19} \right)}^2}}}{5}} \right)} \\ &= \sqrt {\frac{1}{4}\left( {81 - 72.2} \right)} \\ &= \sqrt {2.2} \\ &= 1.48\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the mean is 3.8 and the standard deviation is 1.48.

04

Compute the test of the null hypothesis \({H_0}:{\mu _d} = 0\) against\({H_0}:{\mu _d} \ne 0\).

a.

The null and alternative hypothesis are:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}{H_0}:{\mu _d} &= 0\\{H_a}:{\mu _d} \ne 0\end{aligned}\)

The significance level is, \(\alpha = 0.05.\)

The test statistic is computed as:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}t &= \frac{{\bar d - {D_0}}}{{{s_d}/\sqrt {{n_d}} }}\\ &= \frac{{3.8 - 0}}{{1.48/\sqrt 5 }}\\ &= \frac{{3.8}}{{0.662}}\\ &= 5.7412\end{aligned}\)

This is a two-tailed test. The rejection region is, \(|t| > {t_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}\).

The degree of freedom is computed as:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}\left( {n - 1} \right) &= \left( {5 - 1} \right)\\ &= 4\end{aligned}\)

The \({t_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}\) value with \(\alpha = 0.05\) corresponding to the degree of freedom 4 obtained from the t-table is 2.776.

Here, \(|t| > {t_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}} \Rightarrow |5.7412| > 2.776.\) So, we reject the null hypothesis.

Hence, there is no sufficient evidence to claim that the difference of the mean pairs is zero.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question: Refer to the Journal of Business Logistics (Vol. 36, 2015) study of the factors that lead to successful performance-based logistics projects, Exercise 2.45 (p. 95). Recall that the opinions of a sample of Department of Defense (DOD) employees and suppliers were solicited during interviews. Data on years of experience for the 6 commercial suppliers interviewed and the 11 government employees interviewed are listed in the accompanying table. Assume these samples were randomly and independently selected from the populations of DOD employees and commercial suppliers. Consider the following claim: “On average, commercial suppliers of the DOD have less experience than government employees.”

a. Give the null and alternative hypotheses for testing the claim.

b. An XLSTAT printout giving the test results is shown at the bottom of the page. Find and interpret the p-value of the test user.

c. What assumptions about the data are required for the inference, part b, to be valid? Check these assumptions graphically using the data in the PBL file.

Question: Deferred tax allowance study. A study was conducted to identify accounting choice variables that influence a manager’s decision to change the level of the deferred tax asset allowance at the firm (The Engineering Economist, January/February 2004). Data were collected for a sample of 329 firms that reported deferred tax assets in 2000. The dependent variable of interest (DTVA) is measured as the change in the deferred tax asset valuation allowance divided by the deferred tax asset. The independent variables used as predictors of DTVA are listed as follows:

LEVERAGE: x1= ratio of debt book value to shareholder’s equity

BONUS: x2 = 1 if firm maintains a management bonus plan,

0 if not

MVALUE: x3 = market value of common stock

BBATH: x4 = 1 if operating earnings negative and lower than last year,

0 if not

EARN: x5 = change in operating earnings divided by total assets

A first-order model was fit to the data with the following results (p-values in parentheses):

Ra2 = .280

y^=0.044+0.006x1-0.035x2-0.001x3+0.296x4+0.010x5

(.070) (.228) (.157) (.678) (.001) (.869)

  1. Interpret the estimate of the β coefficient for x4.
  2. The “Big Bath” theory proposed by the researchers’ states that the mean DTVA for firms with negative earnings and earnings lower than last year will exceed the mean DTVA of other firms. Is there evidence to support this theory? Test using α = .05.
  3. Interpret the value of Ra2.

Given that xis a binomial random variable, compute P(x)for each of the following cases:

a. n= 7, x= 3, p= .5

b. n= 4, x= 3, p= .8

c. n= 15, x= 1, p= .1

Drug content assessment. Refer to Exercise 8.16 (p. 467)and the Analytical Chemistry (Dec. 15, 2009) study in which scientists used high-performance liquid chromatography to determine the amount of drug in a tablet. Recall that 25 tablets were produced at each of two different, independent sites. The researchers want to determine if the two sites produced drug concentrations with different variances. A Minitab printout of the analysis follows. Locate the test statistic and p-value on the printout. Use these values α=.05and to conduct the appropriate test for the researchers.

Test and CI for two Variances: Content vs Site

Method

Null hypothesis α1α2=1

Alternative hypothesis α1α21

F method was used. This method is accurate for normal data only.

Statistics

Site N St Dev Variance 95% CI for St Devs

1 25 3.067 9.406 (2.195,4.267)

2 25 3.339 11.147 (2.607,4.645)

Ratio of standard deviation =0.191

Ratio of variances=0.844

95% Confidence Intervals

Method CI for St Dev Ratio CI Variance Ratio

F (0.610, 1.384) (0.372, 1.915)

Tests

Method DF1 DF2 Test statistic p-value

F 24 24 0.84 0.681

Oil content of fried sweet potato chips. Refer to theJournal of Food Engineering (September 2013) study of the characteristics of fried sweet potato chips, Exercise 7.90 (p. 431). Recall that a sample of 6 sweet potato slices fried at 130° using a vacuum fryer yielded the following statistics on internal oil content (measured in gigagrams [Gg]): x1 = .178 Gg and s1 = .011 Gg. A second sample of 6 sweet potato slices was obtained, but these were subjected to a two-stage frying process (again, at 130°) in an attempt to
improve texture and appearance. Summary statistics on internal oil content for this second sample follows: x2 = .140 Gg and s2 = .002 Gg. Using a t-test, the researchers want to compare the mean internal oil content of sweet potato chips fried with the two methods. Do you recommend the researchers carry out this analysis? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free