Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

List the assumptions necessary for each of the following inferential techniques:

a. Large-sample inferences about the difference\({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\) between population means using a two sample z-statistic

Short Answer

Expert verified

a)

  • The two samples are independent.
  • The populations have any distribution.
  • The two samples are large sample. i.e. \({n_1} \ge 30\,and\,{n_2} \ge 30\)

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

Let \({x_1}\,and\,{x_2}\) are two populations.

\({\mu _1}\)is the mean for population 1.

\({\mu _2}\)is the mean for population 2.

\({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\) is the difference between them.

02

Test statistic and confidence interval of large sample

The test statistic is given by

\(z = \frac{{\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) - {D_0}}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{\sigma _1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{\sigma _2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} }}\)

And the confidence interval is given by

\(\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) \pm {z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}\sqrt {\frac{{\sigma _1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{\sigma _2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} \)

03

Assumptions

  • The two samples are independent.
  • The populations have any distribution.
  • The two samples are large sample. i.e. \({n_1} \ge 30\,and\,{n_2} \ge 30\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The โ€œwinnerโ€™s curseโ€ in transaction bidding. In transaction bidding, the โ€œwinnerโ€™s curseโ€ is the miracle of the winning (or loftiest) shot price being above the anticipated value of the item being auctioned. The Review of Economics and Statistics (Aug. 2001) published a study on whether shot experience impacts the liability of the winnerโ€™s curse being. Two groups of a stab in a sealed-shot transaction were compared (1)super-experienced stab and (2) less educated stab. In the super-experienced group, 29 of 189 winning flings were above the itemโ€™s anticipated value; 32 of 149 winning flings were above the itemโ€™s anticipated value in the less-educated group.

  1. Find an estimate of p1, the true proportion of super educated stab who fell prey to the winnerโ€™s curse
  2. Find an estimate of p2, the true proportion of less-educated stab who fell prey to the winnerโ€™s curse.
  3. Construct a 90 confidence interval for p1-p2.
  4. d. Give a practical interpretation of the confidence interval, part c. Make a statement about whether shot experience impacts the liability of the winnerโ€™s curse being.

Shopping vehicle and judgment. Refer to the Journal ofMarketing Research (December 2011) study of shopping cart design, Exercise 2.85 (p. 112). Recall that design engineers want to know whether the mean choice of the vice-over-virtue score is higher when a consumerโ€™s arm is flexed (as when carrying a shopping basket) than when the consumerโ€™s arm is extended (as when pushing a shopping cart). The average choice score for the n1 = 11 consumers with a flexed arm was xยฏ1= 59, while the average for the n2 = 11
Consumers with an extended arm was xยฏ2= 43. In which scenario is the assumption required for a t-test to compare means more likely to be violated, S1= 4 and S2= 2, or, S1= 10 and S2 = 15? Explain.

Given that xis a binomial random variable, compute P(x)for each of the following cases:

a. n= 7, x= 3, p= .5

b. n= 4, x= 3, p= .8

c. n= 15, x= 1, p= .1

Forensic analysis of JFK assassination bullets. Following theassassination of President John F. Kennedy (JFK) in 1963, the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) conducted an official government investigation. The HSCA concluded that although there was a probable conspiracy involving at least one shooter in addition to Lee Harvey Oswald, the additional shooter missed all limousine occupants. A recent analysis of assassination bullet fragments, reported in the Annals of Applied Statistics(Vol. 1, 2007), contradicted these findings, concluding that the evidence used by the HSCA to rule out a second assassin is fundamentally flawed. It is well documented that at least two different bullets were the source of bullet fragments found after the assassination. Let E= {bullet evidence used by the HSCA}, T= {two bullets used in the assassination}, and= {more than two bullets used in the assassination}. Given the evidence (E), which is more likely to have occurredโ€” two bullets used (T) or more than two bullets used ?

a. The researchers demonstrated that the ratio,P(T\E)/P(Tc\E), is less than 1. Explain why this result supports the theory of more than two bullets used in the assassination of JFK.

b. To obtain the result, part a, the researchers first showed that P(T\E)P(Tc\E)=[PE\T.PT][PE\Tc.PTc]Demonstrate this equality using Bayesโ€™s Rule.

Identify the rejection region for each of the following cases. Assume

v1=7andv2=9

a. Ha:ฯƒ12<ฯƒ22,ฮฑ=.05

b. Ha:ฯƒ12>ฯƒ22,ฮฑ=.01

c. Ha:ฯƒ12โ‰ ฯƒ22,ฮฑ=.1withs12>s22

d. Ha:ฯƒ12<ฯƒ22,ฮฑ=.025

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free