Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Drug content assessment. Refer to Exercise 8.16 (p. 467)and the Analytical Chemistry (Dec. 15, 2009) study in which scientists used high-performance liquid chromatography to determine the amount of drug in a tablet. Recall that 25 tablets were produced at each of two different, independent sites. The researchers want to determine if the two sites produced drug concentrations with different variances. A Minitab printout of the analysis follows. Locate the test statistic and p-value on the printout. Use these values α=.05and to conduct the appropriate test for the researchers.

Test and CI for two Variances: Content vs Site

Method

Null hypothesis α1α2=1

Alternative hypothesis α1α21

F method was used. This method is accurate for normal data only.

Statistics

Site N St Dev Variance 95% CI for St Devs

1 25 3.067 9.406 (2.195,4.267)

2 25 3.339 11.147 (2.607,4.645)

Ratio of standard deviation =0.191

Ratio of variances=0.844

95% Confidence Intervals

Method CI for St Dev Ratio CI Variance Ratio

F (0.610, 1.384) (0.372, 1.915)

Tests

Method DF1 DF2 Test statistic p-value

F 24 24 0.84 0.681

Short Answer

Expert verified

The answer can be reduced from the following steps.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

n=25α=.05

Finding the test statistic and p-value on the printout is required for this question. Additionally, you must conduct the test using the alpha value.

02

Explaining the various types of tests

Individuals must choose the proper test because conclusions, interpretations, and suggestions will be based on our analyses.

1.T-tests

Comparing two variables within the same population is done using paired t-tests. For instance, obtained the same group's pre- and post-scores or scores from the same group under various circumstances.

The test aims to determine whether statistical support exists for the claim that the mean difference between observations for a given outcome differs significantly from zero. These t-tests are also referred to as dependent t-tests or repeated measures t-tests.

The variable of interest has to be continuous, the respondents in each situation should be the same, must usually distribute distinction between the pair measures, and your data must not contain any outliers to use this test.

2.Anova-test

The t-tests mentioned above have a few drawbacks. Only two means can be compared, and they can only be applied to one independent variable. ANOVA, which compares various means, is a statistical method that can be used when more than one independent variable has been changed.

3.F-test

An F-test is any statistical test that produces a test statistic with an F-distribution under the null hypothesis. It is frequently used when contrasting models fitted to data sets to determine which statistical model best represents the population from which sampled the data. After the models have been least squares fitted to the data, exact "F-tests" are typically needed.

03

Locating the test statistic, p-value and conducting the test using  α=.05

Test and CI for two Variances: Content vs Site

Method

Null hypothesis α1α2=1

Alternative hypothesis α1α21

F method was used. This method is accurate for normal data only.

Statistics

Site N St Dev Variance 95% CI for St Devs

1 25 3.067 9.406 (2.195,4.267)

2 25 3.339 11.147 (2.607,4.645)

Ratio of standard deviation =0.191

Ratio of variances=0.844

95% Confidence Intervals

Method CI for St Dev Ratio CI Variance Ratio

F (0.610, 1.384) (0.372, 1.915)

Tests

Method DF1 DF2 Test statistic p-value

F 24 24 0.84 0.681

The printout displays this F-test. The printout highlights the test statistic (F = 0.84) and p-value (p-value = 0.681). No need to reject the null hypothesis that the population variances of the success indices are not equal because a = 0.05 is less than the p-value.

Let

Null hypothesis α1α2=1

Alternative hypothesis α1α21

Here need to ensure that the upper tail is used when forming the rejection region for the two-tailed F-test and include the more considerable sample variance in the F-test statistic's numerator to achieve this.

For example, the numerator localid="1664862541925" S21and denominator S22have df=n-1df=25-1df=24, respectively. The test statistic will be a result

F=LargersamplevarianceSmallersamplevarianceF=S21S22F=3.0673.339F=0.918

When the calculated value of F exceeds the tabulated value, rejectα1α2=1

forα=0.05

Fα2=0.025Fα=1.19

F = 0.918 is in the region of rejection. Therefore the test indicates that the information is sufficient to show that the population variances are different.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Assume that x is a binomial random variable with n = 1000 andp = 0.50. Use a normal approximation to find each of the following probabilities:

a. P(x>500)

b.P(490x<500)

c.P(x>550)

Given that x is a random variable for which a Poisson probability distribution provides a good approximation, use statistical software to find the following:

a.P(x2) when λ=1

b.P(x2) when λ=2

c.P(x2) when λ=3

d. What happens to the probability of the event {x2} as λ it increases from 1 to 3? Is this intuitively reasonable?

Given that xis a binomial random variable, compute P(x)for each of the following cases:

a. n= 7, x= 3, p= .5

b. n= 4, x= 3, p= .8

c. n= 15, x= 1, p= .1

Forensic analysis of JFK assassination bullets. Following theassassination of President John F. Kennedy (JFK) in 1963, the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) conducted an official government investigation. The HSCA concluded that although there was a probable conspiracy involving at least one shooter in addition to Lee Harvey Oswald, the additional shooter missed all limousine occupants. A recent analysis of assassination bullet fragments, reported in the Annals of Applied Statistics(Vol. 1, 2007), contradicted these findings, concluding that the evidence used by the HSCA to rule out a second assassin is fundamentally flawed. It is well documented that at least two different bullets were the source of bullet fragments found after the assassination. Let E= {bullet evidence used by the HSCA}, T= {two bullets used in the assassination}, and= {more than two bullets used in the assassination}. Given the evidence (E), which is more likely to have occurred— two bullets used (T) or more than two bullets used ?

a. The researchers demonstrated that the ratio,P(T\E)/P(Tc\E), is less than 1. Explain why this result supports the theory of more than two bullets used in the assassination of JFK.

b. To obtain the result, part a, the researchers first showed that P(T\E)P(Tc\E)=[PE\T.PT][PE\Tc.PTc]Demonstrate this equality using Bayes’s Rule.

A random sample of n observations is selected from a normal population to test the null hypothesis that σ2=25. Specify the rejection region for each of the following combinations of Ha,αand n.

a.Ha:σ225;α=0.5;n=16

b.Ha:σ2>25;α=.10;n=15

c.Ha:σ2>25;α=.01;n=23

d. Ha:σ2<25;α=.01;n=13

e. Ha:σ225;α=.10;n=7

f. Ha:σ2<25;α=.05;n=25

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free