Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Question: Is caffeine addictive? Does the caffeine in coffee, tea, and cola induce an addiction similar to that induced by alcohol, tobacco, heroin, and cocaine? In an attempt to answer this question, researchers at Johns Hopkins University examined 27 caffeine drinkers and found 25 who displayed some type of withdrawal symptoms when abstaining from caffeine. [Note: The 27 caffeine drinkers volunteered for the study.] Furthermore, of 11 caffeine drinkers who were diagnosed as caffeine dependent, 8 displayed dramatic withdrawal symptoms (including impairment in normal functioning) when they consumed a caffeine-free diet in a controlled setting. The National Coffee Association claimed, however, that the study group was too small to draw conclusions. Is the sample large enough to estimate the true proportion of caffeine drinkers who are caffeine dependent to within .05 of the true value with 99% confidence? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The required sample size is 640. So, the sample size is not large enough to estimate the true proportion of caffeine drinkers who are caffeine dependent on being within 0.05 with 99% confidence.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

The sample size of caffeine drinkers is 27.

The number of success be 11.

The confidence level is 99%.

The sampling error is 0.05.

02

Compute the point estimate of the population proportion.

The point estimate of the population proportion is obtained below:p^=Numberofsuccessinthesample(x)Sample\kern1ptsize(n)=1127

03

Compute the Zα2 value. 

Let the confidence level be 0.99.

For1-α=0.99α=0.01α2=0.005

TheZα2obtained from the standard normal table is,

Zα2=Z0.005=2.575

04

State the formula used to obtain the sample size

The formula for sample size is given below:

n=Zα22pqSE2

Where SE is the sampling error.

The value of the pq is unknown; it can be estimated by using the sample fraction of success,from a prior sample.

05

Compute the sample size.

Let the sample proportionp^is 0.407.

Here, the value pq is unknown. Which can be obtained by using the sample fraction of successp^,p^.

The product of pq is computed as

pq=p1-p=0.4071-0.407=0.4070.593=0.241351

The sample size is computed as

n=2.57520.4070.5930.0052=1.60030.0025=640.123640

Hence, the required sample size is 640. So, the sample size is not large enough to estimate the true proportion of caffeine drinkers who are caffeine dependent to be within 0.05 with 99% confidence. Because the pq values are not closed to 0.5.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Intrusion detection systems. The Journal of Researchof the National Institute of Standards and Technology (November–December 2003) published a study of a doubleintrusion detection system with independent systems. Ifthere is an intruder, system A sounds an alarm with probability.9, and system B sounds an alarm with probability.95. If there is no intruder, system A sounds an alarm withprobability .2, and system B sounds an alarm with probability.1. Now assume that the probability of an intruderis .4. Also assume that under a given condition (intruderor not), systems A and B operate independently. If bothsystems sound an alarm, what is the probability that anintruder is detected?

Question: Deferred tax allowance study. A study was conducted to identify accounting choice variables that influence a manager’s decision to change the level of the deferred tax asset allowance at the firm (The Engineering Economist, January/February 2004). Data were collected for a sample of 329 firms that reported deferred tax assets in 2000. The dependent variable of interest (DTVA) is measured as the change in the deferred tax asset valuation allowance divided by the deferred tax asset. The independent variables used as predictors of DTVA are listed as follows:

LEVERAGE: x1= ratio of debt book value to shareholder’s equity

BONUS: x2 = 1 if firm maintains a management bonus plan,

0 if not

MVALUE: x3 = market value of common stock

BBATH: x4 = 1 if operating earnings negative and lower than last year,

0 if not

EARN: x5 = change in operating earnings divided by total assets

A first-order model was fit to the data with the following results (p-values in parentheses):

Ra2 = .280

y^=0.044+0.006x1-0.035x2-0.001x3+0.296x4+0.010x5

(.070) (.228) (.157) (.678) (.001) (.869)

  1. Interpret the estimate of the β coefficient for x4.
  2. The “Big Bath” theory proposed by the researchers’ states that the mean DTVA for firms with negative earnings and earnings lower than last year will exceed the mean DTVA of other firms. Is there evidence to support this theory? Test using α = .05.
  3. Interpret the value of Ra2.

Web Check response rates. Response rates to Web checks are generally low, incompletely due to druggies starting but not. I am finishing the check. Survey Methodology (December 2013) delved into the factors that impact response rates. In a designed study, Web druggies were directed to. Share in one of several checks with different formats. For illustration, one format employed a welcome screen with a white background, and another format employed a welcome screen with a red background. The “break-off rates,” i.e., the proportion of tried druggies who break off the check before completing all questions, for the two formats are handed in the table.

White Welcome screen

Red Welcome screen

Number of Web users

198

183

The number who break off the survey

49

37

Break-off rate

.258

.202

Source: R. Haer and N. Meidert, “Does the First Impression Count? Examining the Effect of the Welcome Screen Design on the Response Rate,” Survey Methodology, Vol. 39, No. 2, December 2013 (Table 4.1).

a. Corroborate the values of the break-off rates shown in the table.

b. The experimenters theorize that the true break-off rate for Web druggies of the red hello screen will be lower than the corresponding break-off rate for the white hello screen. Give the null and indispensable suppositions for testing this proposition.

c. Cipher the test statistic for the test.

d. Find the p- the value of the test.

e. Make the applicable conclusion using α = .10.

The data for a random sample of six paired observations are shown in the next table.

a. Calculate the difference between each pair of observations by subtracting observation two from observation 1. Use the differences to calculate d¯andsd2.

b. If μ1andμ2are the means of populations 1 and 2, respectively, expressed μdin terms of μ1andμ2.

PairSample from Population 1

(Observation 1)

Sample from Population 2(Observation 2)
123456739648417247

c. Form a 95% confidence interval for μd.

d. Test the null hypothesis H0d=0against the alternative hypothesis Had0. Useα=.05 .

Ages of self-employed immigrants. Is self-employment for immigrant workers a faster route to economic advancement in the country? This was one of the questions studied in research published in the International Journal of Manpower (Vol. 32, 2011). One aspect of the study involved comparing the ages of self-employed and wage-earning immigrants. The researcher found that in Sweden, native wage earners tend to be younger than self-employed natives. However, immigrant wage earners tend to be older than self-employed immigrants. This inference was based on the table's summary statistics for male Swedish immigrants.

Self-employed immigrants

Wage-earning immigrants

Sample Size

870

84,875

Mean

44.88

46.79

Source: Based on L. Andersson, "Occupational Choice and Returns to Self-Employment Among Immigrants," International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 32, No. 8, 2011 (Table I).

a. Based on the information given, why is it impossible to provide a measure of reliability for the inference "Self-employed immigrants are younger, on average, than wage-earning immigrants in Sweden"?

b. What information do you need to measure reliability for the inference, part a?

c. Give a value of the test statistic that would conclude that the true mean age of self-employed immigrants is less than the true mean age of wage-earning immigrants if you are willing to risk a Type I error rate of .01.

d. Assume that s, the standard deviation of the ages is the same for both self-employed and wage-earning immigrants. Give an estimate of s that would lead you to conclude that the true mean age of self-employed immigrants is less than the true mean age of wage-earning immigrants using α=0.01 .

e. Is the true value of s likely to be larger or smaller than the one you calculated in part d?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free