Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Question: Deferred tax allowance study. A study was conducted to identify accounting choice variables that influence a manager’s decision to change the level of the deferred tax asset allowance at the firm (The Engineering Economist, January/February 2004). Data were collected for a sample of 329 firms that reported deferred tax assets in 2000. The dependent variable of interest (DTVA) is measured as the change in the deferred tax asset valuation allowance divided by the deferred tax asset. The independent variables used as predictors of DTVA are listed as follows:

LEVERAGE: x1= ratio of debt book value to shareholder’s equity

BONUS: x2 = 1 if firm maintains a management bonus plan,

0 if not

MVALUE: x3 = market value of common stock

BBATH: x4 = 1 if operating earnings negative and lower than last year,

0 if not

EARN: x5 = change in operating earnings divided by total assets

A first-order model was fit to the data with the following results (p-values in parentheses):

Ra2 = .280

y^=0.044+0.006x1-0.035x2-0.001x3+0.296x4+0.010x5

(.070) (.228) (.157) (.678) (.001) (.869)

  1. Interpret the estimate of the β coefficient for x4.
  2. The “Big Bath” theory proposed by the researchers’ states that the mean DTVA for firms with negative earnings and earnings lower than last year will exceed the mean DTVA of other firms. Is there evidence to support this theory? Test using α = .05.
  3. Interpret the value of Ra2.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Answer

  1. The value of coefficient of is 0.296 which is positive indicating a positive relation among DTVA and BBATH(x4) .
  2. 95% significance level, it can be concluded that .β40Hence it can be concluded with enough evidence that is not statistically significant for the model.
  3. The value of R2ais 0.28 indicating about 28% of variation in the data is explained by the model. This value is very low indicating that the model fitted to the data is not a good fit or ideal fit for the data.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information 

The predicted model is given as:
y=0.044+0.006x1-0.035x2-0.001x3+0.296x4+0.010x5

Where y is the dependent variable and x’s are the dependent variable. The standard error of y is givens as 0.070, the standard error for the constant term is 0.228 and the standard error for x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,are 0.157, 0.678, 0.001, and 0.869 respectively. The value for and we have to conduct the test at α=.05.

02

Interpretation of  β4

a.

The value of coefficient of x4 is 0.296 which is positive indicating a positive relation among DTVA and BBATH (x4) . However, the lower value of the coefficient indicates that the changes in DTVA due to the variable might not be very high (slope of the line is very steep).

03

Significance of β4 

b.

H0:β4=0Ha:β40

Here, t-test statistic,

t=β^4sβ^4=0.2960.001=296

Value of t0.025,328is 1.96

H0 is rejected if t-statistic>t0.05,24,24. For α=0.025, since,t>t0.05,31 sufficient evidence to reject H0 at 95% confidence interval.

Therefore,β40.

Hence, it can be concluded with enough evidence thatis not statistically significant for the model.

04

Interpretation of  R2a

c.

The adjusted R squared is a modified version of R-squared.It is a corrected goodness of fit measures for linear models, here the value ofR2a is 0.28 indicating about 28% of variation in the data is explained by the model. This value is very low indicating that the model fitted to the data is not a good fit or ideal fit for the data.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What are the treatments for a designed experiment with two factors, one qualitative with two levels (A and B) and one quantitative with five levels (50, 60, 70, 80, and 90)?

Find the following probabilities for the standard normal random variable z:

a.P(0<z<2.25)b.P(-2.25<z<0)b.P(-2.25<z<1.25)d.P(-2.50<z<1.50)e.P(z<-2.33orz>2.33)

Refer to the Archives of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (Dec. 2007) study of honey as a children’s cough remedy, Exercise 2.31 (p. 86). Children who were ill with an upper respiratory tract infection and their parents participated in the study. Parents were instructed to give their sick child dosage of liquid “medicine” before bedtime. Unknown to the parents, some were given a dosage of dextromethorphan (DM)—an over-the-counter cough medicine—while others were given a similar dose of honey. (Note: A third group gave their children no medicine.) Parents then rated their children’s cough symptoms, and the improvement in total cough symptoms score was determined for each child. The data (improvement scores) for the 35 children in the DM dosage group and the 35 in the honey dosage group are reproduced in the next table. Do you agree with the statement (extracted from the article), “Honey may be a preferable treatment for the cough and sleep difficulty associated with childhood upper respiratory tract infection”? Use the comparison of the two means methodology presented in this section to answer the question.

The data is given below:

Honey Dosage:

12111511101310415169141061081112128129111510159138121089512

DM Dosage:

469477791210116349781212412137101394410159126

History of corporate acquisitions. Refer to the Academy of Management Journal (August 2008) investigation of the performance and timing of corporate acquisitions, Exercise 2.12 (p. 74). Recall that the investigation discovered that in a random sample of 2,778 firms, 748 announced one or more acquisitions during the year 2000. Does the sample provide sufficient evidence to indicate that the true percentage of all firms that announced one or more acquisitions during the year 2000 is less than 30%? Use a=0.05to make your decision.

Whistle-blowing among federal employees. Whistle blowing refers to an employee’s reporting of wrongdoing by co-workers. A survey found that about 5% of employees contacted had reported wrongdoing during the past 12 months. Assume that a sample of 25 employees in one agency are contacted and let x be the number who have observed and reported wrongdoing in the past 12 months. Assume that the probability of whistle-blowing is .05 for any federal employee over the past 12 months.

a. Find the mean and standard deviation of x. Can x be equal to its expected value? Explain.

b. Write the event that at least 5 of the employees are whistle-blowers in terms of x. Find the probability of the event.

c. If 5 of the 25 contacted have been whistle-blowers over the past 12 months, what would you conclude about the applicability of the 5% assumption to this

agency? Use your answer to part b to justify your conclusion.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free