Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Latex allergy in health care workers. Refer to the Current Allergy & Clinical Immunology (March 2004) study of health care workers who use latex gloves, Exercise 6.112 (p. 375). In addition to the 46 hospital employees who were diagnosed with a latex allergy based on a skin-prick test, another 37 health care workers were diagnosed with the allergy using a latex-specific serum test. Of these 83 workers with confirmed latex allergy, only 36 suspected that they had the allergy when asked on a questionnaire. Make a statement about the likelihood that a health care worker with latex allergy suspects he or she actually has the allergy. Attach a measure of reliability to your inference.

Short Answer

Expert verified

It is 95% confident that the proportion of health care workers with a latex allergy suspect their allergy is between 0.32712 and 0.54011.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Let x be the number of workers who had allergies they suspected on the questionnaire.

So, x = 36

Also, the total numbers of workers are 83. That is, n = 83

02

Calculating the confidence interval

Since, out of 83 workers with confirmed latex allergy, only 36 suspected that they had the allergy.

Therefore, the proportion is given as,

p=3683=0.4337

03

Confidence Interval

The confidence interval for proportion is given by,

p±zα2×p(1-p)n

Now, from the standard normal table, the value zα2for a 95% confidence level is 1.96.

Therefore,

p±zα2×p1-pn=0.4337±1.96×0.43371-0.433783=0.4337±1.96×0.4337×0.566783=0.4337±0.10662

=0.4337-0.10662,0.4337+0.10662=0.32712,0.54054

Therefore, it is 95% confident that the proportion of health care workers with a latex allergy suspects their allergy is between 0.32712 and 0.54011.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

History of corporate acquisitions. Refer to the Academy of Management Journal (August 2008) investigation of the performance and timing of corporate acquisitions, Exercise 2.12 (p. 74). Recall that the investigation discovered that in a random sample of 2,778 firms, 748 announced one or more acquisitions during the year 2000. Does the sample provide sufficient evidence to indicate that the true percentage of all firms that announced one or more acquisitions during the year 2000 is less than 30%? Use a=0.05to make your decision.

Find the numerical value of

a.6! b.(109)c. (101)d.(63)e.0!

Buy-side vs. sell-side analysts' earnings forecasts. Refer to the Financial Analysts Journal (Jul. /Aug. 2008) study of financial analysts' forecast earnings, Exercise 2.86 (p. 112). Recall that data were collected from 3,526 buy-side analysts and 58,562forecasts made by sell-side analysts, and the relative absolute forecast error was determined for each. The mean and standard deviation of forecast errors for both types of analysts are given in the table.

a. Construct a 95% confidence interval for the difference between the mean forecast error of buy-side analysts and the mean forecast error of sell-side analysts.

b. Based on the interval, part a, which type of analysis has the greater mean forecast error? Explain.

c. What assumptions about the underlying populations of forecast errors (if any) are necessary for the validity of the inference, part b?

4.135 Suppose xhas an exponential distribution with θ=1. Find

the following probabilities:

a.P(x>1)b.P(x3)cP(x>1.5)d.P(x5)

Forensic analysis of JFK assassination bullets. Following theassassination of President John F. Kennedy (JFK) in 1963, the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) conducted an official government investigation. The HSCA concluded that although there was a probable conspiracy involving at least one shooter in addition to Lee Harvey Oswald, the additional shooter missed all limousine occupants. A recent analysis of assassination bullet fragments, reported in the Annals of Applied Statistics(Vol. 1, 2007), contradicted these findings, concluding that the evidence used by the HSCA to rule out a second assassin is fundamentally flawed. It is well documented that at least two different bullets were the source of bullet fragments found after the assassination. Let E= {bullet evidence used by the HSCA}, T= {two bullets used in the assassination}, and= {more than two bullets used in the assassination}. Given the evidence (E), which is more likely to have occurred— two bullets used (T) or more than two bullets used ?

a. The researchers demonstrated that the ratio,P(T\E)/P(Tc\E), is less than 1. Explain why this result supports the theory of more than two bullets used in the assassination of JFK.

b. To obtain the result, part a, the researchers first showed that P(T\E)P(Tc\E)=[PE\T.PT][PE\Tc.PTc]Demonstrate this equality using Bayes’s Rule.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free