Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Question: Independent random samples from approximately normal populations produced the results shown below.

Sample 1

Sample 2

52 33 42 4441 50 44 5145 38 37 4044 50 43

52 43 47 5662 53 61 5056 52 53 6050 48 60 55

a. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that (μ1-μ2)>10? Test usingα=0.1.

b. Construct a confidence interval for (μ1-μ2). Interpret your result.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Answer

A confidence interval is described as the set of numbers seen in our sample for which we anticipate discovering the figure that best represents the entire population.

Step by step solution

01

(a) Conduct the test

For Sample 1

x¯1=43.6n1=15σ1=5.47

For Sample 2

x¯2=53.625n2=16σ2=5.41

The null hypothesis is H0:(μ1-μ2)=10, the alternate hypothesis is H0:(μ1-μ2)>10and the level of significance is 0.01 .

The pooled standard deviation issp=n1-1σ12+n2-1σ22n1+n2-2

=15-15.472+16-15.41215+16-2=5.44t=x1¯-x¯2-μ1-μ2sp1n1+1n2=43.6-53.625-105.44115+116=-0.0251.955=-1.240.52=-0.01

The degree of freedom of test is 15+16-2=29.

From the t-distribution table, the critical value at 0.10 the level of significance for 29 degrees of freedom is 2.46.

Since, , so the null hypothesis will not be rejected.

Therefore, we cannot conclude that (μ1-μ2)>10.

02

(b) Find confidence interval.

The 98% confidence interval for the difference in means

=x¯1-x¯2±tα/2×sp1n1+1n2=43.6-53.625±2.46×5.44115+116=10.025±2.46×5.44×0.36=10.025±4.82

Thus, the confidence interval for the disparity of means is 5.205to14.845.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question: A company sent its employees to attend two different English courses. The company is interested in knowing if there is any difference between the two courses attended by its employees. When the employees returned from the courses, the company asked them to take a common test. The summary statistics of the test results of each of the two English courses are recorded in the following table:

a. Identify the parameter(s) that would help the company determine the difference between the two courses.

b. State the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses that the company would like to test.

c. After conducting the hypothesis test at thesignificance level, the company found the p-value. Interpret this result for the company.

Drug content assessment. Refer to Exercise 8.16 (p. 467)and the Analytical Chemistry (Dec. 15, 2009) study in which scientists used high-performance liquid chromatography to determine the amount of drug in a tablet. Recall that 25 tablets were produced at each of two different, independent sites. The researchers want to determine if the two sites produced drug concentrations with different variances. A Minitab printout of the analysis follows. Locate the test statistic and p-value on the printout. Use these values α=.05and to conduct the appropriate test for the researchers.

Test and CI for two Variances: Content vs Site

Method

Null hypothesis α1α2=1

Alternative hypothesis α1α21

F method was used. This method is accurate for normal data only.

Statistics

Site N St Dev Variance 95% CI for St Devs

1 25 3.067 9.406 (2.195,4.267)

2 25 3.339 11.147 (2.607,4.645)

Ratio of standard deviation =0.191

Ratio of variances=0.844

95% Confidence Intervals

Method CI for St Dev Ratio CI Variance Ratio

F (0.610, 1.384) (0.372, 1.915)

Tests

Method DF1 DF2 Test statistic p-value

F 24 24 0.84 0.681

The gender diversity of a large corporation’s board of directors was studied in Accounting & Finance (December 2015). In particular, the researchers wanted to know whether firms with a nominating committee would appoint more female directors than firms without a nominating committee. One of the key variables measured at each corporation was the percentage of female board directors. In a sample of 491firms with a nominating committee, the mean percentage was 7.5%; in an independent sample of 501firms without a nominating committee, the mean percentage was role="math" localid="1652702402701" 4.3% .

a. To answer the research question, the researchers compared the mean percentage of female board directors at firms with a nominating committee with the corresponding percentage at firms without a nominating committee using an independent samples test. Set up the null and alternative hypotheses for this test.

b. The test statistic was reported as z=5.1 with a corresponding p-value of 0.0001. Interpret this result if α=0.05.

c. Do the population percentages for each type of firm need to be normally distributed for the inference, part b, to be valid? Why or why not?

d. To assess the practical significance of the test, part b, construct a 95% confidence interval for the difference between the true mean percentages at firms with and without a nominating committee. Interpret the result.

Studies have established that rudeness in the workplace can lead to retaliatory and counterproductive behaviour. However, there has been little research on how rude behaviours influence a victim’s task performance. Such a study was conducted, and the results were published in the Academy of Management Journal (Oct. 2007). College students enrolled in a management course were randomly assigned to two experimental conditions: rudeness condition (students) and control group (students). Each student was asked to write down as many uses for a brick as possible in minutes. For those students in the rudeness condition, the facilitator displayed rudeness by generally berating students for being irresponsible and unprofessional (due to a late-arriving confederate). No comments were made about the late-arriving confederate to students in the control group. The number of different uses for brick was recorded for each student and is shown below. Conduct a statistical analysis (at α=0.01) to determine if the true mean performance level for students in the rudeness condition is lower than the actual mean performance level for students in the control group.

The data is given below

Control Group:

124516217201920191023160491317130212117311119912185213015421211101311361013161228191230


Rudeness Condition:

411181196511912757311191110789107114135478381591610071513921310

To compare the means of two populations, independent random samples of 400 observations are selected from each population, with the following results:

Sample 1

Sample 2

x¯1=5,275σ1=150

x¯2=5,240σ2=200

a. Use a 95%confidence interval to estimate the difference between the population means (μ1μ2). Interpret the confidence interval.

b. Test the null hypothesis H0:(μ1μ2)=0versus the alternative hypothesis Ha:(μ1μ2)0 . Give the significance level of the test and interpret the result.

c. Suppose the test in part b was conducted with the alternative hypothesis Ha:(μ1μ2)0 . How would your answer to part b change?

d. Test the null hypothesis H0:(μ1μ2)=25 versus Ha:(μ1μ2)25. Give the significance level and interpret the result. Compare your answer with the test conducted in part b.

e. What assumptions are necessary to ensure the validity of the inferential procedures applied in parts a–d?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free