Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Is honey a cough remedy? Refer to the Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (December 2007) study of honey as a remedy for coughing, Exercise 2.31 (p. 86). Recall that the 105 ill children in the sample were randomly divided into groups. One group received a dosage of an over-the-counter cough medicine (DM); another group received a dosage of honey (H). The coughing improvement scores (as determined by the children’s parents) for the patients in the two groups are reproduced in the accompanying table. The pediatric researchers desire information on the variation in coughing improvement scores for each of the two groups.

a. Find a 90% confidence interval for the standard deviation in improvement scores for the honey dosage group.

b. Repeat part a for the DM dosage group.

c. Based on the results, parts a and b, what conclusions can the pediatric researchers draw about which group has the smaller variation in improvement scores? (We demonstrate a more statistically valid method for comparing variances in Chapter 8.)

Honey Dosage

11 12 15 11 10 13 10 13 10 4 15 16 9 14 10 6 10 11 12 12 8 12 9 11 15 10 15 9 13 8 12 10 9 5 12

DM Dosage

4 6 9 4 7 7 7 9 12 10 11 6 3 4 9 12 7 6 8 12 12 4 12 13 7 10 13 9 4 4 10 15 9

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. The 90% confidence interval for honey dosage group is2.39,3.58

b. The 90% confidence interval for DM dosage group is2.71,4.12

c. It is observed that the width of the confidence interval for honey dosage is less when compare the same with the cough dosage, so it can say that the honey dosage is having smaller variation in the improvement scores.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The given problem is a study of remedy of cough. Here for the study two types of remedies are considered, one is honey and cough medicine. The coughing improvement scores for the two treatments are recorded. Given data is as follows

Honey Dosage

11 12 15 11 10 13 10 13 10 4 15 16 9 14 10 6 10 11 12 12 8 12 9 11 15 10 15 9 13 8 12 10 9 5 12

DM Dosage

4 6 9 4 7 7 7 9 12 10 11 6 3 4 9 12 7 6 8 12 12 4 12 13 7 10 13 9 4 4 10 15 9

02

Calculating the Confidence Interval for the honey dosage group

a.

From the honey dosage improvement scores,

Let,

n=35,x¯=10.714,s=2.86

n=35

The sample mean for honey dosage group is calculated using the following formula:

x¯=1ni=1nxi=13511+12+...+12=10.714

Also, the sample standard deviation for honey dosage group is calculated using the following formula:

s=1ni=1nxi-x¯2=13511-10.712+...+12-10.712=2.86

Therefore, the 90% confidence interval can be calculated using the formula,

n-1s2χα/22σn-1s2χ1-α/22

The degrees of freedom is 34, at 0.10 level of significance, from the table value,

χ0.052=48.60andχ0.9952=21.66

Substitute the values to get the required confidence interval,

35-12.86248.60σ35-12.86221.66348.179648.60σ348.179621.662.39σ3.58

Therefore, the 90% confidence interval forσ is2.39,3.58

03

Calculating the Confidence Interval for the DM dosage group

b.

From the DM dosage improvement scores,

Let,

n=33

The sample mean for honey dosage group is calculated using the following formula:

x¯=1ni=1nxi=1334+6+...+9=8.33

Also, the sample standard deviation for honey dosage group is calculated using the following formula:

s=1ni=1nxi-x¯2=1334-8.332+...+9-8.332=3.26

Therefore, the 90% confidence interval can be calculated using the formula,

n-1s2χα/22σn-1s2χ1-α/22


The degrees of freedom is 32, at 0.10 level of significance, from the table value,

χ0.052=46.19andχ0.9952=20.07

Substitute the values to get the required confidence interval,

33-13.26246.19σ33-13.26220.073210.627646.19σ3210.627620.072.71σ4.12

Therefore, the 90% confidence interval forσ is2.71,4.12

04

Interpretation

c.

From the above two confidence intervalsfor coughing improvement scores, It is observed that the width of the confidence interval for honey dosage is less when compare the same with the cough dosage and two interval coincides with each other.

So, it can say that the honey dosage is having smaller variation in the improvement scores.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A random sample of n = 6 observations from a normal distribution resulted in the data shown in the table. Compute a 95% confidence interval for σ2

A paired difference experiment produced the following results:

nd=38,x¯1=92,x¯2=95.5,d¯=-3.5,sd2=21

a. Determine the values zfor which the null hypothesis μ1μ2=0would be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis μ1μ2<0 Use .role="math" localid="1652704322912" α=.10

b. Conduct the paired difference test described in part a. Draw the appropriate conclusions.

c. What assumptions are necessary so that the paired difference test will be valid?

d. Find a90% confidence interval for the mean difference μd.

e. Which of the two inferential procedures, the confidence interval of part d or the test of the hypothesis of part b, provides more information about the differences between the population means?

4.134 Refer to Exercise 4.133. Find the following probabilities:

a.P(20x30)b.P(20<x30)c.P(x30)d.P(x45)e.(x40)f.(x<40)g.P(15x35)h.P(21.5x31.5)

Comparing taste-test rating protocols. Taste-testers of new food products are presented with several competing food samples and asked to rate the taste of each on a 9-point scale (where1="dislike extremely" and9="like extremely"). In the Journal of Sensory Studies (June 2014), food scientists compared two different taste-testing protocols. The sequential monadic (SM) method presented the samples one-at-a-time to the taster in a random order, while the rank rating (RR) method presented the samples to the taster all at once, side-by-side. Consider the following experiment (similar to the one conducted in the journal): 50 consumers of apricot jelly were asked to taste test five different varieties. Half the testers used the SM protocol and half used the RR protocol during testing. In a second experiment, 50 consumers of cheese were asked to taste-test four different varieties. Again, half the testers used the SM protocol and half used the RR protocol during testing. For each product (apricot jelly and cheese), the mean taste scores of the two protocols (SM and RR) were compared. The results are shown in the accompanying tables.

a. Consider the five varieties of apricot jelly. Identify the varieties for which you can conclude that "the mean taste scores of the two protocols (SM and RR) differ significantly atα=.05."

b. Consider the four varieties of cheese. Identify the varieties for which you can conclude that "the mean taste scores of the two protocols (SM and RR) differ significantly atα=.05."

c. Explain why the taste-test scores do not need to be normally distributed for the inferences, parts a and b, to be valid.

Enough money has been budgeted to collect independent random samples of size n1=n2=100from populations 1 and 2 to estimate localid="1664867109106" μ1-μ2. Prior information indicates that σ1=σ2=10. Have sufficient funds been allocated to construct a 90% confidence interval forμ1-μ2of width 5 or less? Justify your answer.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free