Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Bacteria in bottled water. Is the bottled water you drinksafe? The Natural Resources Defense Council warns thatthe bottled water you are drinking may contain morebacteria and other potentially carcinogenic chemicals thanallowed by state and federal regulations. Of the more than1,000 bottles studied, nearly one-third exceeded governmentlevels (www.nrdc.org). Suppose that the NaturalResources Defense Council wants an updated estimate ofthe population proportion of bottled water that violates atleast one government standard. Determine the sample size(number of bottles) needed to estimate this proportion towithin 0.01 with 99% confidence.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The sample size needed to estimate this proportion to within 0.01 with 99% confidence is 14746

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The Natural Resources Defense Council warns that the bottled water you are drinking may contain more bacteria and other potentially carcinogenic chemicals than allowed by state and federal regulations. Of the more than 1,000 bottles studied, nearly one-third exceeded government levels

02

Finding the sample size

Here the sample proportion is 1/3.

Therefore,

p^=13=0.333333

q^=1p^=10.333333=0.666667

Here the standard error is 0.01

The critical value for a 99% confidence interval is zα/2=z0.01/2=z0.005=2.576

SE=zα/2p^q^nn=z2α/2p^q^SE2n=2.5762×0.333333×0.6666670.012n=14746.17n14746

The required sample size is 14746

The sample size needed to estimate this proportion to within 0.01 with 99% confidence is 14746

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Study of aircraft bird-strikes. As worldwide air traffic volume has grown over the years, the problem of airplanes striking birds and other flying wildlife has increased dramatically. The International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering (Vol. 3, 2013) reported on a study of aircraft bird strikes at Aminu Kano International Airport in Nigeria. During the survey period, a sample of 44 aircraft bird strikes were analyzed. The researchers found that 36 of the 44 bird strikes at the airport occurred above 100 feet. Suppose an airport air traffic controller estimates that less than 70% of aircraft bird strikes occur above 100 feet. Comment on the accuracy of this estimate. Use a 95% confidence interval to support your inference.

Scallops, sampling, and the law. Interfaces (March–April 1995) presented the case of a ship that fishes for scallops off the coast of New England. In order to protect baby scallops from being harvested, the U.S. Fisheries and Wildlife Service requires that “the average meat per scallop weigh at least 136 of a pound.” The ship was accused of violating this weight standard. Author Arnold Barnett lays out the scenario:

The vessel arrived at a Massachusetts port with 11,000 bags of scallops, from which the harbormaster randomly selected 18 bags for weighing. From each such bag, his agents took a large scoopful of scallops; then, to estimate the bag’s average meat per scallop, they divided the total weight of meat in the scoopful by the number of scallops it contained. Based on the 18 [numbers] thus generated, the harbormaster estimated that each of the ship’s scallops possessed an average of 139 of a pound of meat (that is, they were about seven percent lighter than the minimum requirement). Viewing this outcome as conclusive evidence that the weight standard had been violated, federal authorities at once confiscated 95 percent of the catch (which they then sold at auction). The fishing voyage was thus transformed into a financial catastrophe for its participants. The actual scallop weight measurements for each of the 18 sampled bags are listed in the table below. For ease of exposition, Barnett expressed each number as a multiple of of a pound, the minimum permissible average weight per scallop. Consequently, numbers below 1 indicate individual bags that do not meet the standard. The ship’s owner filed a lawsuit against the federal government, declaring that his vessel had fully complied with the weight standard. A Boston law firm was hired to represent the owner in legal proceedings, and Barnett was retained by the firm to provide statistical litigation support and, if necessary, expert witness testimony.

0.93

0.88

0.85

0.91

0.91

0.84

0.90

0.98

0.88

0.89

0.98

0.87

0.91

0.92

0.99

1.14

1.06

0.93

  1. Recall that the harbormaster sampled only 18 of the ship’s 11,000 bags of scallops. One of the questions the lawyers asked Barnett was, “Can a reliable estimate of the mean weight of all the scallops be obtained from a sample of size 18?” Give your opinion on this issue.
  2. As stated in the article, the government’s decision rule is to confiscate a catch if the sample mean weight of the scallops is less than 136 of a pound. Do you see any flaws in this rule?
  3. Develop your own procedure for determining whether a ship is in violation of the minimum-weight restriction. Apply your rule to the data. Draw a conclusion about the ship in question.

The following is a 90% confidence interval for p:(0.26, 0.54). How large was the sample used to construct thisinterval?

Customers who participate in a store’s free loyalty card program save money on their purchases but allow the store to keep track of their shopping habits and potentially sell these data to third parties. A Pew Internet & American Life Project Survey (January 2016) revealed that half (225) of a random sample of 250 U.S. adults would agree to participate in a store loyalty card program, despite the potential for information sharing.

a. Estimate the true proportion of all U.S. adults who would agree to participate in a store loyalty card program, despite the potential for information sharing.

b. Form a 90% confidence interval around the estimate, part a.

c. Provide a practical interpretation of the confidence interval, part b. Your answer should begin with, “We are 90% confident . . .”

d. Explain the theoretical meaning of the phrase, “We are 90% confident.”

Explain the difference between an interval estimator and a point estimator for μ

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free