Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Question: Explain the differences in the sampling distributions of xfor large and small samples under the following assumptions.

a. The variable of interest, x, is normally distributed.

b. Nothing is known about the distribution of the variable x.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Answer

a. No difference

b. Sample distribution will be if the size is large and remain unknown if the size is small.

Step by step solution

01

Whenever the variable of interest remains normally distributed

a.

If the variable of interest remains normally distributed, the sample size will not affect the sampling distribution in this case. Therefore, the sampling distribution will be and will be normal.

02

Determination of the differences when nothing is known

b.

In this case, the sampling distribution will remain at whenever the sample size will remain large which means when the sample size will be above 30. T the sampling distribution will remain unknown whenever the sample size remains less than 30.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Improving the productivity of chickens. Farmers have discovered that the more domestic chickens peck at objects placed in their environment, the healthier and more productive the chickens seem to be. White string has been found to be a particularly attractive pecking stimulus. In one experiment, 72 chickens were exposed to a string stimulus. Instead of white string, blue-colored string was used. The number of pecks each chicken took at the blue string over a specified time interval was recorded. Summary statistics for the 72 chickens were x = 1.13 pecks, s = 2.21 pecks (Applied Animal Behavior Science, October 2000).

a. Estimate population mean number of pecks made by chickens pecking at blue string using a 99% confidence interval. Interpret the result.

b. Previous research has shown that = 7.5 pecks if chickens are exposed to white string. Based on the results, part a, is there evidence that chickens are more apt to peck at white string than blue string? Explain.

Scallops, sampling, and the law. Interfaces (Marchโ€“April 1995) presented the case of a ship that fishes for scallops off the coast of New England. In order to protect baby scallops from being harvested, the U.S. Fisheries and Wildlife Service requires that โ€œthe average meat per scallop weigh at least 136 of a pound.โ€ The ship was accused of violating this weight standard. Author Arnold Barnett lays out the scenario:

The vessel arrived at a Massachusetts port with 11,000 bags of scallops, from which the harbormaster randomly selected 18 bags for weighing. From each such bag, his agents took a large scoopful of scallops; then, to estimate the bagโ€™s average meat per scallop, they divided the total weight of meat in the scoopful by the number of scallops it contained. Based on the 18 [numbers] thus generated, the harbormaster estimated that each of the shipโ€™s scallops possessed an average of 139 of a pound of meat (that is, they were about seven percent lighter than the minimum requirement). Viewing this outcome as conclusive evidence that the weight standard had been violated, federal authorities at once confiscated 95 percent of the catch (which they then sold at auction). The fishing voyage was thus transformed into a financial catastrophe for its participants. The actual scallop weight measurements for each of the 18 sampled bags are listed in the table below. For ease of exposition, Barnett expressed each number as a multiple of of a pound, the minimum permissible average weight per scallop. Consequently, numbers below 1 indicate individual bags that do not meet the standard. The shipโ€™s owner filed a lawsuit against the federal government, declaring that his vessel had fully complied with the weight standard. A Boston law firm was hired to represent the owner in legal proceedings, and Barnett was retained by the firm to provide statistical litigation support and, if necessary, expert witness testimony.

0.93

0.88

0.85

0.91

0.91

0.84

0.90

0.98

0.88

0.89

0.98

0.87

0.91

0.92

0.99

1.14

1.06

0.93

  1. Recall that the harbormaster sampled only 18 of the shipโ€™s 11,000 bags of scallops. One of the questions the lawyers asked Barnett was, โ€œCan a reliable estimate of the mean weight of all the scallops be obtained from a sample of size 18?โ€ Give your opinion on this issue.
  2. As stated in the article, the governmentโ€™s decision rule is to confiscate a catch if the sample mean weight of the scallops is less than 136 of a pound. Do you see any flaws in this rule?
  3. Develop your own procedure for determining whether a ship is in violation of the minimum-weight restriction. Apply your rule to the data. Draw a conclusion about the ship in question.

Suppose you wish to estimate a population mean correct to within .20 with probability equal to .90. You do not know ฯƒ2, but you know that the observations will range in value between 30 and 34.

a. Find the approximate sample size that will produce the desired accuracy of the estimate. You wish to be conservative to ensure that the sample size will be ample to achieve the desired accuracy of the estimate. [Hint: Using your knowledge of data variation from Section 2.6, assume that the range of the observations will equal 4ฯƒ.]

b. Calculate the approximate sample size, making the less conservative assumption that the range of the observations is equal to 6ฯƒ.

Do social robots walk or roll? Refer to the International Conference on Social Robotics (Vol. 6414, 2010) study of the trend in the design of social robots, Exercise 5.44 (p. 320). The researchers obtained a random sample of 106 social robots through a Web search and determined that 63 were designed with legs, but no wheels.

a. Find a 99% confidence interval for the proportion of all social robots designed with legs but no wheels. Interpret the result.

b. In Exercise 5.42, you assumed that 40% of all social robots are designed with legs but no wheels. Comment on the validity of this assumption.

Lobster trap placement. Refer to the Bulletin of MarineScience(April 2010) study of lobster trap placement,Exercise 6.29 (p. 348). Recall that you used a 95% confidenceinterval to estimate the mean trap spacing (in meters)for the population of red spiny lobster fishermen fishing inBaja California Sur, Mexico. How many teams of fishermenwould need to be sampled in order to reduce the width ofthe confidence interval to 5 meters? Use the sample standarddeviation from Exercise 6.29 in your calculation.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free