Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

For safety reasons, calf dehorning has become a routine practice at dairy farms. A report by Europe’s Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health (SANKO) stated that 80% of European dairy farms carry out calf dehorning. A later study, published in the Journal of Dairy Science (Vol. 94,2011), found that in a sample of 639 Italian dairy farms, 515 dehorned calves. Does the Journal of Dairy Science study support or refute the figure reported by SANKO? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

We have sufficient evidence to support the figure reported by SANKO that 80% of European dairy farms carry out calf dehorning.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

As per the report published by SANKO, 80% of European dairy farms carry out calf dehorning.

As per the Journal of Dairy Science (Vol. 94, 2011), out of 639 Italian dairy farms, 515 dehorned calves.

That is

The size of the sample isn=639

The sample proportion is

p^=515639=0.806

Wherep^ is the sample proportion of Italian dairy farms out calf dehorning.

02

Setting up the hypotheses

We have to test the claim reported by SANKO that 80% of European dairy farms carry out calf dehorning by using the survey published in the Journal of Dairy Science.

The null and alternative hypotheses are given as

H0:p=0.80

That is, the true proportion of Italian dairy farms that carry out calf dehorning is 80%.

And

Ha:p0.80

That is, the proportion of Italian dairy farms carrying out calf dehorning is different from

03

Calculating the test statistic

The test statistic for testing these hypotheses is

Z=p^-pp1-pn=0.806-0.800.801-0.80639=0.0060.0002504=0.38

04

Calculating the critical value

Assume

α:The level of significance (chance of making a type I error)

α=.05

Using the standard normal table, the critical value at the 5% significance level is 1.96.

We can see that

Z=0.38<1.96

Hence, we failed to reject the null hypothesis.

05

Conclusion

At a 5% significance level, we have sufficient evidence to support the figure reported by SANKO that 80% of European dairy farms carry out calf dehorning.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If you select a very small value for αwhen conducting a hypothesis test, will β tend to be big or small? Explain.

Hotels’ use of ecolabels. Refer to the Journal of Vacation Marketing (January 2016) study of travelers’ familiarity with ecolabels used by hotels, Exercise 2.64 (p. 104). Recall that adult travelers were shown a list of 6 different ecolabels, and asked, “Suppose the response is measured on a continuous scale from 10 (not familiar at all) to 50 (very familiar).” The mean and standard deviation for the Energy Star ecolabel are 44 and 1.5, respectively. Assume the distribution of the responses is approximately normally distributed.

a. Find the probability that a response to Energy Star exceeds 43.

b. Find the probability that a response to Energy Star falls between 42 and 45. c. If you observe a response of 35 to an ecolabel, do you think it is likely that the ecolabel was Energy Star? Explain.

Producer's and consumer's risk. In quality-control applications of hypothesis testing, the null and alternative hypotheses are frequently specified as\({H_0}\)The production process is performing satisfactorily. \({H_a}\): The process is performing in an unsatisfactory manner. Accordingly, \(\alpha \) is sometimes referred to as the producer's risk, while \(\beta \)is called the consumer's risk (Stevenson, Operations Management, 2014). An injection molder produces plastic golf tees. The process is designed to produce tees with a mean weight of .250 ounce. To investigate whether the injection molder is operating satisfactorily 40 tees were randomly sampled from the last hour's production. Their weights (in ounces) are listed in the following table.

a. Write \({H_0}\) and \({H_a}\) in terms of the true mean weight of the golf tees, \(\mu \).

b. Access the data and find \(\overline x \)and s.

c. Calculate the test statistic.

d. Find the p-value for the test.

e. Locate the rejection region for the test using\({H_a} = 0.01\).

f. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the process is not operating satisfactorily?

g. In the context of this problem, explain why it makes sense to call \(\alpha \)the producer's risk and \(\beta \)the consumer's risk.

Latex allergy in health care workers. Refer to the Current Allergy & Clinical Immunology (March 2004) study of n = 46 hospital employees who were diagnosed with a latex allergy from exposure to the powder on latex gloves, Exercise 6.112 (p. 375). The number of latex gloves used per week by the sampled workers is summarized as follows: \(\bar x = 19.3\) and s = 11.9. Let \(\mu \) represent the mean number of latex gloves used per week by all hospital employees. Consider testing \({H_0}:\mu = 20\) against \({H_a}:\mu < 20.\)

a. Give the rejection region for the test at a significance level of \(\alpha = 0.01.\)

Feminized faces in TV commercials. Television commercials most often employ females or “feminized” males to pitch a company’s product. Research published in Nature (August 27 1998) revealed that people are, in fact, more attracted to “feminized” faces, regardless of gender. In one experiment, 50 human subjects viewed both a Japanese female face and a Caucasian male face on a computer. Using special computer graphics, each subject could morph the faces (by making them more feminine or more masculine) until they attained the “most attractive” face. The level of feminization x (measured as a percentage) was measured.

a. For the Japanese female face, x = 10.2% and s = 31.3%. The researchers used this sample information to test the null hypothesis of a mean level of feminization equal to 0%. Verify that the test statistic is equal to 2.3.

b. Refer to part a. The researchers reported the p-value of the test as p = .021. Verify and interpret this result.

c. For the Caucasian male face, x = 15.0% and s = 25.1%. The researchers reported the test statistic (for the test of the null hypothesis stated in part a) as 4.23 with an associated p-value of approximately 0. Verify and interpret these results.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free