Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A random sample of 41 observations from a normal population possessed a mean \(\bar x = 88\) and a standard deviation s = 6.9.

a. Test \({H_0}:{\sigma ^2} = 30\) against \({H_a}:{\sigma ^2} > 30\). Use\(\alpha = 0.05.\)

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the true value of the variance is 30.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The number of samples is, n=41.

The sample mean,\(\bar x = 88.\)

The sample standard deviation is, s=6.9.

02

State the large sample test of hypothesis about\({\sigma ^2}.\)

The test statistic for the large sample test of Hypothesis about \({\sigma ^2}\) is,

\(\chi _c^2 = \frac{{\left( {n - 1} \right){s^2}}}{{\sigma _0^2}}\)

Where n is the number of sample size, s is the sample variance, and \(\sigma _0^2\) is the population variance.\(\)

03

Compute the test \({H_0}:{\sigma ^2} = 30\)against \({H_0}:{\sigma ^2} > 30\) at \(\alpha  = 0.05.\)

a.

The null and alternative hypothesis are:

\(\begin{aligned}{H_0}:{\sigma ^2} = 30\\{H_0}:{\sigma ^2} > 30\end{aligned}\)

The significance level is, \(\alpha = 0.05.\)

The test statistic is computed as:

\(\begin{aligned}\chi _c^2 &= \frac{{\left( {n - 1} \right){s^2}}}{{\sigma _0^2}}\\ &= \frac{{\left( {41 - 1} \right){{\left( {6.9} \right)}^2}}}{{30}}\\ &= \frac{{40 \times 47.61}}{{30}}\\ &= 63.48\end{aligned}\)

This is a one-tailed test. The rejection region is, \(\chi _c^2 > \chi _\alpha ^2.\)

The degrees of freedom is computed as:

\(\begin{aligned}\left( {n - 1} \right) &= \left( {41 - 1} \right)\\ &= 40\end{aligned}\)

The \(\chi _\alpha ^2\) value with \(\alpha = 0.05\)and degree of freedom 40 obtained from the Chi-square table is,

\(\begin{aligned}\chi _\alpha ^2 &= \chi _{0.05}^2\\ &= 55.76\end{aligned}\)

Here, \(\chi _c^2 > \chi _\alpha ^2 \Rightarrow 63.48 > 55.76\).The test statistic \(\chi _c^2\)falls in a rejection region. So, we reject the null hypothesis.

Hence, there is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the true value of the variance is 30.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Accidents at construction sites. In a study published in the Business & Economics Research Journal (April 2015), occupational accidents at three construction sites in Turkey were monitored. The total numbers of accidents at the three randomly selected sites were 51, 104, and 37.

Summary statistics for these three sites are:\(\bar x = 64\)and s = 35.3. Suppose an occupational safety inspector claims that the average number of occupational accidents at all Turkish construction sites is less than 70

a. Set up the null and alternative hypotheses for the test.

b. Find the rejection region for the test using\(\alpha = .01\)

c. Compute the test statistic.

d. Give the appropriate conclusion for the test.

e. What conditions are required for the test results to be valid?

Shopping vehicle and judgment. Refer to the Journal of Marketing Research (December 2011) study of grocery store shoppersโ€™ judgments, Exercise 2.85 (p. 112). For one part of the study, 11 consumers were told to put their arm in a flex position (similar to carrying a shopping basket) and then each consumer was offered several choices between a vice product and a virtue product (e.g., a movie ticket vs. a shopping coupon, pay later with a larger amount vs. pay now). Based on these choices, a vice choice score was determined on a scale of 0 to 100 (where higher scores indicate a greater preference for vice options). The data in the next table are (simulated) choice scores for the 11 consumers. Suppose that the average choice score for consumers with an extended arm position (similar to pushing a shopping cart) is known to be \(\mu = 50\) . The researchers theorize that the mean choice score for consumers shopping with a flexed arm will be higher than 43 (reflecting their higher propensity to select a vice product) Test the theory at \(\alpha = 0.05\)

If you select a very small value for ฮฑwhen conducting a hypothesis test, will ฮฒ tend to be big or small? Explain.

Latex allergy in health care workers. Refer to the Current Allergy & Clinical Immunology (March 2004) study of n = 46 hospital employees who were diagnosed with a latex allergy from exposure to the powder on latex gloves, Exercise 6.112 (p. 375). The number of latex gloves used per week by the sampled workers is summarized as follows: \(\bar x = 19.3\) and s = 11.9. Let \(\mu \) represent the mean number of latex gloves used per week by all hospital employees. Consider testing \({H_0}:\mu = 20\) against \({H_a}:\mu < 20.\)

a. Give the rejection region for the test at a significance level of \(\alpha = 0.01.\)

-Question:Consumersโ€™ use of discount coupons. In 1894, druggist Asa Candler began distributing handwritten tickets to his customers for free glasses of Coca-Cola at his soda fountain. That was the genesis of the discount coupon. In 1975, it was estimated that 65% of U.S. consumers regularly used discount coupons when shopping. In a more recent consumer survey, 81% said they regularly redeem coupons (NCH Marketing Services 2015 Consumer Survey). Assume the recent survey consisted of a random sample of 1,000 shoppers.

a. Does the survey provide sufficient evidence that the percentage of shoppers using cents-off coupons exceeds 65%? Test using ฮฑ = 0.05.

b. Is the sample size large enough to use the inferential procedures presented in this section? Explain.

c. Find the observed significance level for the test you conducted in part a and interpret its value.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free