Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Forecasting electrical consumption. Two different methods of forecasting monthly electrical consumption were compared and the results published in Applied Mathematics and Computation (Vol. 186, 2007). The two methods were Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Time Series Regression (TSR). Forecasts were made using each method for each of 4 months. These forecasts were also compared with the actual monthly consumption values. A layout of the design is shown in the next table. The researchers want to compare the mean electrical consumption values of the ANN forecast, TSR forecast, and Actual consumption

a. Identify the experimental design employed in the study.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. We considered a randomized block design in the study.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

Two different methods of forecasting are artificial neural networks and time series regression.

Forecasts were made for each of 4months.

02

Randomized Block design

The randomized block design is very useful. The basic idea here is to compare treatment levels within a block of relatively homogeneous experimental material then repeat the comparison on another block and so on.

03

Step 3:

Here, we considered a randomized block design in the study.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Robots trained to behave like ants. Robotic researchers investigated whether robots could be trained to behave like ants in an ant colony (Nature, August 2000). Robots were trained and randomly assigned to โ€œcoloniesโ€ (i.e., groups) consisting of 3, 6, 9, or 12 robots. The robots were assigned the task of foraging for โ€œfoodโ€ and to recruit another robot when they identified a resource-rich area. One goal of the experiment was to compare the mean energy expended (per robot) of the four different colony sizes.

a. What type of experimental design was employed?

Suppose you conduct a 4 * 3 factorial experiment.

a. How many factors are used in the experiment?

b. Can you determine the factor type(s)โ€”qualitative or quantitativeโ€”from the information given? Explain.

c. Can you determine the number of levels used for each factor? Explain.

d. Describe a treatment for this experiment and determine the number of treatments used.

e. What problem is caused by using a single replicate of this experiment? How is the problem solved?

Define an experiment-wise error rate.

Accounting and Machiavellianism. A study of Machiavellian traits in accountants was published in Behavioral Research in Accounting (January 2008). Recall (from Exercise 1.33, p. 52) that Machiavellian describes negative character traits such as manipulation, cunning, duplicity, deception, and bad faith. A Mach rating score was determined for each in a sample of accounting alumni of a large southwestern university. The accountants were then classified as having high, moderate, or low Mach rating scores. For one portion of the study, the researcher investigated the impact of both Mach score classification and gender on the average income of an accountant. For this experiment, identify each of the following:

a. Experimental unit

b. Response variable

c. Factors

d. Levels of each factor

e. Treatments

Identify whether the following levels of factors are qualitative or quantitative.

a. Method of payment (cash, check, and credit card)

b. Hotel service rating (1 for Fair, 2 for Average, 3 for Good, and 4 for Excellent)

c. Percentage return on investment (1%, 5.5%, and 8.3%)

d. Time taken to complete a car race (22 minutes, 25 minutes, and 29 minutes)

e. Number printed on the back of a football jersey (1, 2, 3, etc.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free