Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Accounting and Machiavellianism. A study of Machiavellian traits in accountants was published in Behavioral Research in Accounting (January 2008). Recall (from Exercise 1.33, p. 52) that Machiavellian describes negative character traits such as manipulation, cunning, duplicity, deception, and bad faith. A Mach rating score was determined for each in a sample of accounting alumni of a large southwestern university. The accountants were then classified as having high, moderate, or low Mach rating scores. For one portion of the study, the researcher investigated the impact of both Mach score classification and gender on the average income of an accountant. For this experiment, identify each of the following:

a. Experimental unit

b. Response variable

c. Factors

d. Levels of each factor

e. Treatments

Short Answer

Expert verified

e. The treatments are (low, male), (moderate, male), (high, male), (low, female), (moderate, female), and (high, female).

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

There are three levels of Mach scores and two levels of gender.

02

Definition

The combination of the different factor levels in the experiment are the treatments.

03

Identifying the treatments

e.

There are six possible treatment combinations of three levels of Mach scores and two levels of gender.

That are (low, male), (moderate, male), (high, male), (low, female), (moderate, female), and (high, female).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Value perceptions of consumers (contโ€™d). Refer to Exercise 9.10. In addition to the factor, Type of advertisement

(within-store price promotion and between-store price promotion), the researchers also investigated the impact of a second factorโ€”Location where ad is read (at home or in the store). About half of the consumers who

were assigned to the within-store price promotion read the ad at home, and the other half read the ad in the store. Similarly, about half of the consumers who were assigned to the between-store price promotion read the ad at home, and the other half read the ad in the store. In this second

experiment, the goal was to compare the average discount values of the groups of consumers created by combining Type of advertisement with Location.

a. How many treatments are involved in this experiment?

b. Identify the treatments.

Identify whether the following levels of factors are qualitative or quantitative.

a. Method of payment (cash, check, and credit card)

b. Hotel service rating (1 for Fair, 2 for Average, 3 for Good, and 4 for Excellent)

c. Percentage return on investment (1%, 5.5%, and 8.3%)

d. Time taken to complete a car race (22 minutes, 25 minutes, and 29 minutes)

e. Number printed on the back of a football jersey (1, 2, 3, etc.)

Drafting NFL quarterbacks. Refer to the Journal of Productivity Analysis (Vol. 35, 2011) study of how successful NFL teams are in drafting productive quarterbacks, Exercise 1.26 (p. 51). Recall that the researchers measured two variables for each of the 331 quarterbacks drafted between

1970 and 2007: (1) Draft position (Top 10, between picks 11 and 50, or after pick 50) and (2) QB production score (where higher scores indicate more productive QBs). Suppose we want to compare the mean production score

of quarterbacks in the three draft position groups. Identify each of the following elements for this study:

a. Response variable

b. Factor(s)

c. Treatments

d. Experimental units

Explain the difference between an experiment that employs a completely randomized design and one that employs a randomized block design.

Refer to Exercises 9.17 and 9.18. Complete the following ANOVA table for each of the two dot plots:

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free