Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Explain the difference between an experiment that employs a completely randomized design and one that employs a randomized block design.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The "complete block" component denotes that every treatment combination is used in every block. The experiment would be known as a Randomized Incomplete Block Design if a block missed one or more treatment combinations. Because the treatment combinations are distributed randomly to the experimental units within the blocks, the design would still be randomized. The experiment will still be referred to as a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with missing data, even if a block only has a few observation units with missing data, as opposed to an "incomplete block design."

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Individuals must briefly describe the completely randomized and completely randomized block design in this question.

02

 Describing the randomized block design and completely random designs

Completely randomized design: Simple randomization is used in a completely randomized design to assign participants to various treatment options (in general, a treatment group, and a control group).

However, because simple randomization is susceptible to chance error, it cannot guarantee that study groups will be equal in terms of every participant characteristic.

Completely randomized block design:A randomized block design divides participants into blocks based on shared characteristics and randomly assigns the treatment options to each block.

By removing a potential alternative explanation for the results (the impact of unevenly distributing the blocking variable), bias is reduced, and the study groups are made comparable.

03

Distinction between complete randomized design and randomized block design

Complete Randomized Design (CRD): Easiest to use design. When experimental units are essentially homogeneous, they can use CRD design. Due to the homogeneity requirement, it might be challenging to use this design for field studies. For experiments with a limited number of treatments, the CRD works best.

Treatments are entirely randomly assigned to experimental units. Each experimental unit has an equal chance of receiving any treatment. A random number table, computer, program, etc., is used to perform randomization.

CRD is a Very adaptable design (i.e., the number of replicates and treatments is only constrained by the number of experimental units readily available).

In comparison to other designs, statistical analysis is straightforward. Information loss as a result of missing data is minimal in comparison to other designs because of the greater degree of freedom for the source of variation in error.

There could be a loss of precision if the experimental units are not homogeneous and you don't use blocking to reduce this variation. Unless experimental units are homogeneous, this design is typically the least effective. Unsuitable for a wide range of treatments.

Complete Randomized Design Block (CRBD): A random assignment of treatment combinations to the experimental units within a block is known as a randomized complete block design, or RCBD. Blocks typically can't be randomized because they stand in for factors restricted from randomization, like location, place, time, gender, ethnicity, breeds, etc.

It is not possible to choose a person's gender at random. Picking one country and dialing "X country" is not possible. But their presence—also referred to as nuisance factors—will cause the study's results to vary consistently. For instance, the crops grown in the northern vs. southern regions will experience various climatic conditions.

As a result, whenever possible, they should be controlled. By limiting these obtrusive factors through blocking, one can improve the experiment's precision and reap various other advantages. The experiments in a completely randomized design (CRD) can only influence random, unknowable, and uncontrolled factors (also known as lucking nuisance factors). If there are systematic and well-known sources of variations (also known as nuisance factors), the RCBD is used to manage and control them.

The most popular type of experiment design is arguably the randomized complete block design (RCBD), used in various fields such as engineering, medicine, and agriculture. In addition to minimizing experimental error, the design broadens the generalizability of the research results.

For instance, if the study uses the location as a limiting factor, it might extrapolate the findings to other locations. A fertilizer manufacturer can only assert that their product is effective when tested in various climates regardless of the climate.

The "complete block" component denotes that every treatment combination is used in every block. The experiment would be known as a Randomized Incomplete Block Design if a block missed one or more treatment combinations. Because the treatment combinations are distributed randomly to the experimental units within the blocks, the design would still be randomized. The experiment will still be referred to as a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with missing data, even if a block only has a few observation units with missing data, as opposed to an "incomplete block design."

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Contingent valuation of homes in contaminated areas. Contingent valuation (CV) is a method of estimating property values that uses survey responses from potential homeowners. CV surveys were employed to determine the impact of contamination on property values in the Journal of Real Estate Research (Vol. 27, 2005). Homeowners were randomly selected from each of seven states—Kentucky, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Alabama, Illinois, South Carolina, and Texas. Each homeowner was asked to estimate the property value of a home located in an area contaminated by petroleum leaking from underground storage tanks (LUST). The dependent variable of interest was the LUST discount percentage (i.e., the difference between the current home value and estimated LUST value as a percentage). The researchers were interested in comparing the mean LUST discount percentages across the seven states.

a. Give the null and alternative hypotheses of interest to the researchers.

b. An ANOVA summary table is shown below. Use the information provided to conduct the hypothesis test, part a. Use \(\alpha = 0.10\).

Value perceptions of consumers (cont’d). Refer to Exercise 9.10. In addition to the factor, Type of advertisement

(within-store price promotion and between-store price promotion), the researchers also investigated the impact of a second factor—Location where ad is read (at home or in the store). About half of the consumers who

were assigned to the within-store price promotion read the ad at home, and the other half read the ad in the store. Similarly, about half of the consumers who were assigned to the between-store price promotion read the ad at home, and the other half read the ad in the store. In this second

experiment, the goal was to compare the average discount values of the groups of consumers created by combining Type of advertisement with Location.

a. How many treatments are involved in this experiment?

b. Identify the treatments.

Evaluation of flexography printing plates. Refer to the Journal of Graphic Engineering and Design (Vol. 3, 2012) study of the quality of flexography printing, Exercise 9.24 (p. 544). Recall that four different exposure times were studied—8, 10, 12, and 14 minutes—and that the measure of print quality used was dot area (hundreds of dots per square millimeter). Tukey’s multiple comparisons procedure (at an experimentwise error rate of .05) was used to rank the mean dot areas of the four exposure times. The results are summarized below. Which exposure time yields the highest mean dot area? Lowest?

Corporate sustainability and firm characteristics. Refer to the Business and Society (March 2011) study on how firm size and firm type impact corporate sustainability behaviors, Exercise 1.28 (p. 51). Certified Public Accountants (CPAs) were surveyed on their firms’ likelihood of reporting sustainability policies (measured as a probability between 0 and 1). The CPAs were divided into four groups depending on firm size (large or small) and firm type (public or private): large/public, large/private, small/ public, and small/private. One goal of the analysis was to determine whether the mean likelihood of reporting sustainability policies differs depending on firm size and firm type. Identify each of the following elements for this study:

a. Experimental units

b. Response variable

c. Factor(s)

d. Factor levels

e. Treatments

Study of mutual fund performance. Mutual funds are classified as large-cap funds, medium-cap funds, or small-cap funds, depending on the capitalization of the companies in the fund. Hawaii Pacific University researchers investigated whether the average performance of a mutual fund is related to capitalization size (American Business Review, January 2002). Independent random samples of 30 mutual funds were selected from each of the three fund groups, and the 90-day rate of return was determined for each fund. The data for the 90 funds were subjected to an analysis of variance, with the results shown in the ANOVA summary table below.

a. State the null and alternative hypotheses for the ANOVA.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free