Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Evaluation of flexography printing plates. Refer to the Journal of Graphic Engineering and Design (Vol. 3, 2012) study of the quality of flexography printing, Exercise 9.24 (p. 544). Recall that four different exposure times were studied—8, 10, 12, and 14 minutes—and that the measure of print quality used was dot area (hundreds of dots per square millimeter). Tukey’s multiple comparisons procedure (at an experimentwise error rate of .05) was used to rank the mean dot areas of the four exposure times. The results are summarized below. Which exposure time yields the highest mean dot area? Lowest?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Exposure times 8 min and 14 min yields the highest mean dot area. Exposure times 12 min yields the lowest mean dot area.

Step by step solution

01

 Given Information

The four different exposure times are 8, 10, 12 and 14 minutes.

Tukey’s multiple comparison method is used to rank at an experiment wise error rate of .05.

02

Tukey’s Method

Tukey’s method requires an equal sample size of treatments. Tukey's procedure is assigned when pairwise comparisons are of interest. The formulas for constructing confidence intervals for differences between treatment means using Tukey’s is given by

Where

k= number of treatments

v = number of degrees of freedom

nt= Number of observations in each k

03

Explanations

The mean dot areas are .571, .582, .588, and .594.

From the above information, we can see that there is no significant difference between the mean dot area of exposures times 8 min and 14 min as both times are joined by line. There is less significance for the exposure time 12 min.

Therefore, the exposure times 8 min is equal to .588.

And the times 14 min is equal to .594

Therefore, exposure times 8 min and 14 min yields the highest mean dot area. Exposure times 12 min yields the lowest mean dot area.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Corporate sustainability and firm characteristics. Refer to the Business and Society (March 2011) study on how firm size and firm type impact corporate sustainability behaviors, Exercise 1.28 (p. 51). Certified Public Accountants (CPAs) were surveyed on their firms’ likelihood of reporting sustainability policies (measured as a probability between 0 and 1). The CPAs were divided into four groups depending on firm size (large or small) and firm type (public or private): large/public, large/private, small/ public, and small/private. One goal of the analysis was to determine whether the mean likelihood of reporting sustainability policies differs depending on firm size and firm type. Identify each of the following elements for this study:

a. Experimental units

b. Response variable

c. Factor(s)

d. Factor levels

e. Treatments

What are the treatments for a designed experiment that uses one qualitative factor with four levels—A, B, C, and D?

Explain the difference between an experiment that employs a completely randomized design and one that employs a randomized block design.

Performance of a bus depot. Refer to the International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (February 2011) study of public bus depot performance, Exercise 9.25 (p. 544). Recall that 150 customers provided overall performance ratings at each of three different bus depots (Depot 1, Depot 2, and Depot 3). The average performance scores were determined to be significantly different at α=.05 using an ANOVA F-test. The sample mean performance scores were reported as . The researchers employed the Bonferroni method to rank the three performance means using an experiment wise error rate of .05. Adjusted 95% confidence intervals for the differences between each pair of treatment means are shown in the table. Use this information to rank the mean performance scores at the three bus depots.

What is the difference between a one-way ANOVA and atwo-way ANOVA?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free