Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Mixed gender decision-making groups. In business, a group of executives is often assigned to make key decisions. The American Journal of Political Science (April 2014) published a study on a woman’s impact on mixed-gender deliberating groups. The researchers randomly assigned subjects to one of several 5-member decision-making groups. The

groups’ gender composition varied as follows: 0 females, 1 female, 2 females, 3 females, 4 females, or 5 females. Each group was then randomly assigned to utilize one of two types of decision rules: unanimous or majority rule. Ten groups were created for each of the 6 * 2 = 12 combinations of gender composition and decision rule. One variable

of interest, measured for each group, was the number of words spoken by women on a certain topic per 1,000 total words spoken during the deliberations.

a. Why is this experiment considered a designed study?

b. Identify the experimental unit and dependent variable in this study.

c. Identify the factors for this study. Give the levels of each factor.

d. How many treatments are in this study? List them.

Short Answer

Expert verified

d. The treatments are (0, unanimous), (1, unanimous), (2, unanimous), (3, unanimous), (4, unanimous), (5, unanimous), (0, majority), (1, majority), (2, majority), (3, majority), (4, majority), (5, majority).

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

The women participants are randomly assigned into ten treatment groups.

02

Concept

The treatments are the ordered pairs of all possible factor levels.

03

Identifying the factor

d.

There are five levels for the first factor and two for the second factor; therefore, the number of treatments is 10.

The list of the treatments is: (0, unanimous), (1, unanimous), (2, unanimous), (3, unanimous), (4, unanimous), (5, unanimous), (0, majority), (1, majority), (2, majority), (3, majority), (4, majority), (5, majority).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Accounting and Machiavellianism. A study of Machiavellian traits in accountants was published in Behavioral Research in Accounting (January 2008). Recall (from Exercise 1.33, p. 52) that Machiavellian describes negative character traits such as manipulation, cunning, duplicity, deception, and bad faith. A Mach rating score was determined for each in a sample of accounting alumni of a large southwestern university. The accountants were then classified as having high, moderate, or low Mach rating scores. For one portion of the study, the researcher investigated the impact of both Mach score classification and gender on the average income of an accountant. For this experiment, identify each of the following:

a. Experimental unit

b. Response variable

c. Factors

d. Levels of each factor

e. Treatments

Corporate sustainability and firm characteristics. Refer to the Business and Society (March 2011) study on how firm size and firm type impact corporate sustainability behaviors, Exercise 1.28 (p. 51). Certified Public Accountants (CPAs) were surveyed on their firms’ likelihood of reporting sustainability policies (measured as a probability between 0 and 1). The CPAs were divided into four groups depending on firm size (large or small) and firm type (public or private): large/public, large/private, small/ public, and small/private. One goal of the analysis was to determine whether the mean likelihood of reporting sustainability policies differs depending on firm size and firm type. Identify each of the following elements for this study:

a. Experimental units

b. Response variable

c. Factor(s)

d. Factor levels

e. Treatments

Contingent valuation of homes in contaminated areas. Contingent valuation (CV) is a method of estimating property values that uses survey responses from potential homeowners. CV surveys were employed to determine the impact of contamination on property values in the Journal of Real Estate Research (Vol. 27, 2005). Homeowners were randomly selected from each of seven states—Kentucky, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Alabama, Illinois, South Carolina, and Texas. Each homeowner was asked to estimate the property value of a home located in an area contaminated by petroleum leaking from underground storage tanks (LUST). The dependent variable of interest was the LUST discount percentage (i.e., the difference between the current home value and estimated LUST value as a percentage). The researchers were interested in comparing the mean LUST discount percentages across the seven states.

a. Give the null and alternative hypotheses of interest to the researchers.

b. An ANOVA summary table is shown below. Use the information provided to conduct the hypothesis test, part a. Use \(\alpha = 0.10\).

What are the treatments for a designed experiment that uses one qualitative factor with four levels—A, B, C, and D?

What is the difference between a one-way ANOVA and atwo-way ANOVA?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free