Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

If \(U \sim U(0,1)\), show that \(\min (U, 1-U) \sim U\left(0, \frac{1}{2}\right)\). Hence justify the computation of a two-sided significance level as \(2 \min \left(P^{-}, P^{+}\right)\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
\(\min(U, 1-U)\) follows a uniform distribution \(U(0, \frac{1}{2})\). The two-sided significance level is computed as \(2 \min(P^{-}, P^{+})\).

Step by step solution

01

Define the Random Variables

We start by considering two random variables: \(U\) which is uniformly distributed over \((0, 1)\) and \(1-U\). Our task is to find the distribution of \(\min(U, 1-U)\). This minimum will take values between 0 and 0.5, since the highest it can be is when \(U = 0.5\) and \(1-U = 0.5\).
02

Determine the Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF)

To find the probability distribution, we compute the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of \(\min(U, 1-U)\). For any \(x\) in \((0, 0.5)\), the CDF \(F(x)\) is the probability that \(\min(U, 1-U) \leq x\). This occurs if either \(U \leq x\) or \(1-U \leq x\). Thus, \(F(x) = P(U \leq x) + P(1-U \leq x) - P(U \leq x \text{ and } 1-U \leq x)\).
03

Calculate Probabilities in CDF Expression

- \(P(U \leq x) = x\) since \(U\) is uniformly distributed over \((0,1)\).- \(P(1-U \leq x) = P(U \geq 1-x) = 1-(1-x) = x\) since \(U\) is uniform.- \(P(U \leq x \text{ and } 1-U \leq x) = P(U \leq x \text{ and } U \geq 1-x) = 0\) because both conditions cannot hold simultaneously.Therefore, the CDF is \(F(x) = x + x = 2x\) for \(x < 0.5\).
04

Verify Uniform Distribution

Given the CDF \(F(x) = 2x\), we can confirm the probability density function (PDF) by differentiating the CDF, which leads to \(f(x) = \frac{d}{dx}F(x) = 2\), showing a constant PDF which is characteristic of a uniform distribution. Therefore, \(\min(U, 1-U)\) is uniformly distributed over \((0, 0.5)\).
05

Justify the Two-Sided Significance Level Calculation

In hypothesis testing, calculating a two-sided significance level involves computing the extreme probabilities of \(\min\) between the observed and expected values. Thus, using symmetry, the significance level can be calculated as \(2 \min(P^{-}, P^{+})\), where \(P^{-}\) and \(P^{+}\) represent the left and right tail probabilities of the distribution, ensuring all extreme outcomes are considered.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Cumulative Distribution Function
The cumulative distribution function (CDF) is a fundamental concept in probability theory used to describe the probability that a random variable is less than or equal to a certain value. It's an essential tool because it encapsulates the entire probability distribution of a random variable, thereby allowing us to easily understand all possible outcomes and their likelihoods. For a uniform distribution, the CDF is particularly straightforward.

In this exercise, we are examining the minimum of two random variables, \(U\) and \(1-U\), both stemming from a uniform distribution over \((0, 1)\). To find the CDF of \(\min(U, 1-U)\), we calculate the probability that \(\min(U, 1-U) \leq x\). This condition implies that either \(U\) or \(1-U\) must both be less than or equal to \(x\).

To derive this, we add the probabilities of each individual condition and subtract the overlap because they cannot both hold true at the same time. Thus, we compute: \(F(x) = P(U \leq x) + P(1-U \leq x) - P(U \leq x \text{ and } 1-U \leq x)\). Since \(U\) is uniformly distributed, these probabilities simplify to \(x\), leading to the CDF, \(F(x) = 2x\) for \(x \in (0, 0.5)\).

This derived function, \(F(x) = 2x\), implies that as \(x\) increases from 0 to 0.5, the likelihood of \(\min(U, 1-U)\) being less than or equal to \(x\) increases linearly, confirming the uniform nature of the distribution.
Probability Density Function
Once we have the cumulative distribution function (CDF) for a random variable, we can derive its probability density function (PDF). The PDF is an essential function in probability theory that describes the likelihood of a random variable to take on a particular value. It is especially crucial for continuous random variables, like those uniformly distributed.

In our scenario with the variable \(\min(U, 1-U)\), we already determined that the CDF is \(F(x) = 2x\) for \(x \in (0, 0.5)\). To find the PDF, we take the derivative of the CDF with respect to \(x\).

Calculating the derivative, we find that the PDF, \(f(x) = \frac{d}{dx}F(x) = 2\) for \(x < 0.5\). This constant value of the PDF illustrates a uniform distribution over \((0, 0.5)\).

In a uniform distribution, each value within the given range is equally probable. Therefore, for \(\min(U, 1-U)\), any value between 0 and 0.5 is equally likely to occur, underscoring the characteristic feature of a uniform distribution. This uniformity is crucial for ensuring consistency in random experiments, leading to more refined predictions and analyses.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a statistical method used to decide the plausibility of a hypothesis based on sample data. It is a core component of statistical inference, aiming to determine whether observed data falls within a pre-determined range of expected outcomes, under a specific hypothesis.

In the context of the exercise, hypothesis testing requires computing a two-sided significance level. This concept involves calculating the probabilities associated with extreme deviations of the test statistic—either higher or lower than expected.

For our uniformly distributed variable \(\min(U, 1-U)\), we compute the significance level by evaluating the tail probabilities. We denote these as \(P^{-}\) and \(P^{+}\), representing the left and right tails, respectively. The significance level for a two-sided hypothesis test is determined as \(2 \min(P^{-}, P^{+})\).

This calculation ensures that we comprehensively account for extreme outcomes that could reject the null hypothesis. Using this symmetry-inspired method, we are able to consider all potential deviations of the statistic, thus improving the robustness of the hypothesis test.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Find the optimal estimating function based on dependent data \(Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) with \(g_{j}(Y ; \theta)=\) \(Y_{j}-\theta Y_{j-1}\) and \(\operatorname{var}\left\\{g_{j}(Y ; \theta) \mid Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{j-1}\right\\}=\sigma^{2} .\) Derive also the estimator \(\tilde{\theta}\). Find the maximum likelihood estimator of \(\theta\) when the conditional density of \(Y_{j}\) given the past is \(N\left(\theta y_{j-1}, \sigma^{2}\right) .\) Discuss.

(a) Let \(Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) be a random sample from the exponential density \(\lambda e^{-\lambda y}, y>0, \lambda>0\) Say why an unbiased estimator \(W\) for \(\lambda\) should have form \(a / S\), and hence find \(a\). Find the Fisher information for \(\lambda\) and show that \(\mathrm{E}\left(W^{2}\right)=(n-1) \lambda^{2} /(n-2)\). Deduce that no unbiased estimator of \(\lambda\) attains the Cramér-Rao lower bound, although \(W\) does so asymptotically. (b) Let \(\psi=\operatorname{Pr}(Y>a)=e^{-\lambda a}\), for some constant \(a\). Show that $$ I\left(Y_{1}>a\right)= \begin{cases}1, & Y_{1}>a \\ 0, & \text { otherwise }\end{cases} $$ is an unbiased estimator of \(\psi\), and hence obtain the minimum variance unbiased estimator. Does this attain the Cramér-Rao lower bound for \(\psi\) ?

Consider testing the hypothesis that a binomial random variable has probability \(\pi=1 / 2\) against the alternative that \(\pi>1 / 2\). For what values of \(\alpha\) does a uniformly most powerful test exist when the denominator is \(m=5\) ?

The incidence of a rare disease seems to be increasing. In successive years the numbers of new cases have been \(y_{1}, \ldots, y_{n}\). These may be assumed to be independent observations from Poisson distributions with means \(\lambda \theta, \ldots, \lambda \theta^{n}\). Show that there is a family of tests each of which, for any given value of \(\lambda\), is a uniformly most powerful test of its size for testing \(\theta=1\) against \(\theta>1\).

Let \(R\) be binomial with probability \(\pi\) and denominator \(m\), and consider estimators of \(\pi\) of form \(T=(R+a) /(m+b)\), for \(a, b \geq 0\). Find a condition under which \(T\) has lower mean squared error than the maximum likelihood estimator \(R / m\), and discuss which is preferable when \(m=5,10\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free