Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Show that when the data are normal, the efficiency of the Huber estimating function \(g_{c}(y ; \theta)\) compared to the optimal function \(g_{\infty}(y ; \theta)\) is $$ \frac{\\{1-2 \Phi(-c)\\}^{2}}{1+2\left\\{c^{2} \Phi(-c)-\Phi(-c)-c \phi(c)\right\\}} $$ Hence verify that the efficiency is \(0.95\) when \(c=1.345\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The efficiency is approximately 0.95 when \( c = 1.345 \).

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Efficiency Formula

The efficiency of the Huber estimating function, denoted as \( g_c(y; \theta) \), compared to the optimal function \( g_{\infty}(y; \theta) \), is given by:\[ \text{Efficiency} = \frac{\left(1-2 \Phi(-c)\right)^{2}}{1+2\left(c^{2} \Phi(-c)-\Phi(-c)-c \phi(c)\right)} \]Here \( \Phi \) represents the cumulative distribution function of the standard normal distribution, and \( \phi \) represents the probability density function of the standard normal distribution.
02

Plug in the Value of c into the Efficiency Formula

To verify the efficiency when \( c = 1.345 \), substitute \( c = 1.345 \) into the efficiency formula:\[ \text{Efficiency} = \frac{\left(1-2 \Phi(-1.345)\right)^{2}}{1+2\left(1.345^{2} \Phi(-1.345)-\Phi(-1.345)-1.345 \phi(1.345)\right)} \]
03

Calculate \( \Phi(-1.345) \) and \( \phi(1.345) \)

Use statistical tables or software to find the values:- \( \Phi(-1.345) \approx 0.0892 \) (since \( \Phi(-c) = 1 - \Phi(c) \), \( \Phi(1.345) \approx 0.9108 \))- \( \phi(1.345) \approx 0.162 \) (using the formula \( \phi(z) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-z^2/2} \))
04

Calculate the Numerator of the Efficiency Formula

Substitute \( \Phi(-1.345) = 0.0892 \) into the numerator:\[ \left(1 - 2 \times 0.0892\right)^2 = (1 - 0.1784)^2 = 0.8216^2 = 0.675 \]
05

Calculate the Denominator of the Efficiency Formula

Substitute \( \Phi(-1.345) = 0.0892 \) and \( \phi(1.345) = 0.162 \) into the denominator:\[ 1 + 2 \times \left(1.345^2 \times 0.0892 - 0.0892 - 1.345 \times 0.162\right) \]Calculate each term:\[ 1.345^2 = 1.809025, \quad 1.345^2 \times 0.0892 \approx 0.1612 \]\[ 0.1612 - 0.0892 - 1.345 \times 0.162 \approx 0.1612 - 0.0892 - 0.21759 \approx -0.14559 \]\[ 1 + 2 \times (-0.14559) \approx 1 - 0.29118 = 0.70882 \]
06

Calculate the Efficiency

Substitute the calculated numerator and denominator into the formula:\[ \text{Efficiency} = \frac{0.675}{0.70882} \approx 0.952 \]
07

Verifying the Efficiency

The calculated efficiency \( \approx 0.952 \) confirms the given condition that the efficiency is approximately 0.95 when \( c = 1.345 \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Huber Estimating Function
The Huber estimating function is an important tool in robust statistics, designed to provide estimates that resist the influence of outliers. In essence, it adjusts between least squares and absolute value methods to handle data with various distributions. This function is particularly effective when dealing with data that contains unexpected deviations.
  • When using the Huber estimating function, a threshold parameter ('c') is chosen.
  • If a data point's deviation from the model is less than 'c', squared distance is used, aligning with the least squares method.
  • For larger deviations, the function uses linear distance to reduce the impact of outliers.
Thus, by adjusting based on the threshold, the estimator effectively balances sensitivity to minor errors and robustness against significant outliers, making it a versatile choice for statistical modeling.
Normal Distribution
The normal distribution is a fundamental concept in statistics, often referred to as the Gaussian distribution. It describes a continuous probability distribution that is symmetric around its mean, showcasing a bell-shaped curve.
  • The normal distribution is defined by two parameters: mean (bc) and standard deviation (c3).
  • The mean describes the distribution's center, and the standard deviation indicates its spread.
  • This distribution is widely applicable for natural phenomena such as heights, test scores, and measurement errors.
The feature that distinguishes the normal distribution is that approximately 68% of data falls within one standard deviation of the mean, making it predictable and easy to work with in various statistical analyses.
Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF)
The cumulative distribution function (CDF) is a crucial concept when analyzing probabilities for a continuous random variable. The CDF shows the probability that a random variable will take a value less than or equal to the input value.
  • For any value 'x', the CDF of a random variable X is defined as \( \Phi(x) = P(X \leq x) \). This provides a total probability accumulated from the lowest possible value to 'x'.
  • It increases monotonically from 0 to 1 as 'x' goes from negative infinity to positive infinity.
  • The CDF is particularly useful when determining probabilities over intervals.
In statistical computations, the CDF is vital for assessing and understanding distribution properties, notably when working with normal distributions, where it is often compared with the PDF to provide comprehensive insights.
Probability Density Function (PDF)
The probability density function (PDF) is a concept defining the likelihood of a continuous random variable taking on a specific value. It is a non-negative function, used to identify how probability density is distributed over an interval.
  • The PDF is defined such that the area under its curve over an interval equals the probability that the random variable falls within that interval.
  • For a normal distribution, the PDF is given by \( \phi(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi} \sigma} e^{-\frac{(x - \mu)^2}{2\sigma^2}} \), describing its bell-shaped curve.
  • The PDF's significant role is not to provide probabilities directly, but to define the density over an interval, which is then integrated to find desired probabilities.
Understanding the PDF for any distribution is essential, as it offers insights into the distribution's behavior and helps in the analysis of the probability of events within specific ranges.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that the random variables \(Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) are such that $$ \mathrm{E}\left(Y_{j}\right)=\mu, \quad \operatorname{var}\left(Y_{j}\right)=\sigma_{j}^{2}, \quad \operatorname{cov}\left(Y_{j}, Y_{k}\right)=0, \quad j \neq k $$ where \(\mu\) is unknown and the \(\sigma_{j}^{2}\) are known. Show that the linear combination of the \(Y_{j}\) 's giving an unbiased estimator of \(\mu\) with minimum variance is $$ \sum_{j=1}^{n} \sigma_{j}^{-2} Y_{j} / \sum_{j=1}^{n} \sigma_{j}^{-2} $$ Suppose now that \(Y_{j}\) is normally distributed with mean \(\beta x_{j}\) and unit variance, and that the \(Y_{j}\) are independent, with \(\beta\) an unknown parameter and the \(x_{j}\) known constants. Which of the estimators $$ T_{1}=n^{-1} \sum_{j=1}^{n} Y_{j} / x_{j}, \quad T_{2}=\sum_{j=1}^{n} Y_{j} x_{j} / \sum_{j=1}^{n} x_{j}^{2} $$ is preferable and why?

(a) Let \(Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) be a random sample from the exponential density \(\lambda e^{-\lambda y}, y>0, \lambda>0\) Say why an unbiased estimator \(W\) for \(\lambda\) should have form \(a / S\), and hence find \(a\). Find the Fisher information for \(\lambda\) and show that \(\mathrm{E}\left(W^{2}\right)=(n-1) \lambda^{2} /(n-2)\). Deduce that no unbiased estimator of \(\lambda\) attains the Cramér-Rao lower bound, although \(W\) does so asymptotically. (b) Let \(\psi=\operatorname{Pr}(Y>a)=e^{-\lambda a}\), for some constant \(a\). Show that $$ I\left(Y_{1}>a\right)= \begin{cases}1, & Y_{1}>a \\ 0, & \text { otherwise }\end{cases} $$ is an unbiased estimator of \(\psi\), and hence obtain the minimum variance unbiased estimator. Does this attain the Cramér-Rao lower bound for \(\psi\) ?

Let \(R\) be binomial with probability \(\pi\) and denominator \(m\), and consider estimators of \(\pi\) of form \(T=(R+a) /(m+b)\), for \(a, b \geq 0\). Find a condition under which \(T\) has lower mean squared error than the maximum likelihood estimator \(R / m\), and discuss which is preferable when \(m=5,10\).

Given that there is a \(1-1\) mapping between \(x_{1}<\cdots

In a scale family, \(Y=\tau \varepsilon\), where \(\varepsilon\) has a known density and \(\tau>0\). Consider testing the null hypothesis \(\tau=\tau_{0}\) against the alternative \(\tau \neq \tau_{0}\). Show that the appropriate group for constructing an invariant test has just one element (apart from permutations) and hence show that the test may be based on the maximal invariant \(Y_{(1)} / \tau_{0}, \ldots, Y_{(n)} / \tau_{0}\). When \(\varepsilon\) is exponential, show that the invariant test is based on \(\bar{Y} / \tau_{0}\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free