Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let \(X_{t}\) be a stationary first-order Markov chain with state space \(\\{1, \ldots, S\\}, S>2\), and let \(I_{t}\) indicate the event \(X_{t}=1\). Is \(\left\\{I_{t}\right\\}\) a Markov chain?

Short Answer

Expert verified
No, \( \{I_t\} \) is not a Markov chain.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Concepts

A Markov chain is a stochastic process that satisfies the Markov property, meaning the future state depends only on the current state and not on the sequence of events that preceded it. A first-order Markov chain specifically means this relationship extends only one step into the future.
02

Define the Indicator Process

The sequence \( \{I_t\} \) represents an indicator process where \( I_t = 1 \) if \( X_t = 1 \) and \( I_t = 0 \) otherwise. This transforms the original state space of \{1, \ldots, S\} into a binary space \{0, 1\} for each time \( t \).
03

Check the Markov Property

To determine if \( \{I_t\} \) is a Markov chain, we need to check if the probability of \( I_{t+1} \) being a particular value depends only on \( I_t \). In general, because \( \{X_t\} \) is a Markov chain, \( X_{t+1} \) depends only on \( X_t \), but \( I_t \) alone does not preserve all the information about \( X_t \) unless \( S = 2 \).
04

Conclusion Based on State Reduction

When \( S > 2 \), the transition probabilities among the states cannot be determined solely from the indicator process \( \{I_t\} \) because there are more states in \( \{X_t\} \) than can be distinguished by a binary \( \{I_t\} \). Thus, \( \{I_t\} \) does not satisfy the Markov property with only the reduced information.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Stationary Processes
A stationary process is a type of stochastic process that has statistical properties, such as mean and variance, that are constant over time. In simpler terms, the probability distribution governing the process does not change when shifted in time. This makes stationary processes an essential element in understanding various phenomena in fields like economics, physics, and finance.

  • **Constant Properties:** Key properties like mean, variance, and autocorrelation function remain unchanged over time.
  • **Predictability:** Since these properties do not alter with time, predictions and analysis become more straightforward.
For our exercise, the stationary process comes from a first-order Markov chain, which implies that the properties are consistent from one moment to the next. There is no drift or trend, making it easier to model and predict future states based solely on the present state. In the context of a Markov chain, this ensures that transition probabilities remain constant over time.
Stochastic Processes
Stochastic processes are mathematical objects used to describe systems that evolve over time with an inherent randomness. Unlike deterministic processes, where future states are fully determined by current conditions, stochastic processes account for randomness and unpredictability, which is more realistic in many real-world scenarios.

  • **Randomness Over Time:** A stochastic process progresses through random changes at each step or over continuous time.
  • **Applications:** Employed in weather forecasting, stock market analysis, and in the study of populations in biology.
A Markov chain is a specific type of stochastic process that includes the dependency on current state only, making it memoryless. This memoryless characteristic is known as the Markov property. Understanding this helps in evaluating whether the indicator function, representing our condition that the state equals 1, can also be treated as a Markov chain.
Indicator Functions
An indicator function is a simple yet powerful concept used in probability and statistics to signify whether a particular condition is met. It outputs 1 if the condition is true and 0 otherwise. This makes it a useful tool for transforming complex or multi-state processes into binary outcomes for simplified analysis.

  • **Binary Outcome:** Reduces a complex scenario to a simple binary decision, easy for modeling and computation.
  • **Versatility:** Commonly used in varied fields like statistics, machine learning, and hypothesis testing.
In the problem at hand, the indicator function is represented by \( \{I_t\} \), where \( I_t \) is 1 if \( X_t = 1 \) and 0 otherwise. Although it simplifies the state space to just two possible values, it can lose important information when the original process involves more than these two states. This loss helps explain why the transformed indicator sequence does not maintain the Markov property when \( S > 2 \).

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(X_{1}, \ldots, X_{n}\) be independent exponential variables with rates \(\lambda_{j} .\) Show that \(Y=\) \(\min \left(X_{1}, \ldots, X_{n}\right)\) is also exponential, with rate \(\lambda_{1}+\cdots+\lambda_{n}\), and that \(\operatorname{Pr}\left(Y=X_{j}\right)=\) \(\lambda_{j} /\left(\lambda_{1}+\cdots+\lambda_{n}\right)\). Hence write down an algorithm to simulate data from a continuoustime Markov chain with finite state space, using exponential and multinomial random number generators.

Classify the states of Markov chains with transition matrices $$ \left(\begin{array}{lll} 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \\ \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} & 0 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{llll} 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array}\right), \quad\left(\begin{array}{cccccc} \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \frac{1}{4} & \frac{3}{4} & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \frac{1}{4} & \frac{1}{4} & \frac{1}{4} & \frac{1}{4} & 0 & 0 \\ \frac{1}{4} & 0 & \frac{1}{4} & \frac{1}{4} & 0 & \frac{1}{4} \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} \end{array}\right). $$

Let \(Y^{\mathrm{T}}=\left(Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{3}\right)\) be a multivariate normal variable with $$ \Omega=\left(\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & m^{-1 / 2} & \frac{1}{2} \\ m^{-1 / 2} & \frac{2}{m} & m^{-1 / 2} \\ \frac{1}{2} & m^{-1 / 2} & 1 \end{array}\right). $$ Find \(\Omega^{-1}\) and hence write down the moral graph for \(Y\). If \(m \rightarrow \infty\), show that the distribution of \(Y\) becomes degenerate while that of \(\left(Y_{1}, Y_{3}\right)\) given \(Y_{2}\) remains unchanged. Is the graph an adequate summary of the joint limiting distribution? Is the Markov property stable in the limit?

Show that the MA(1) models \(Y_{t}=\varepsilon_{t}+\beta \varepsilon_{t-1}\) and \(Y_{t}=\varepsilon_{t}+\beta^{-1} \varepsilon_{t-1}\) have the same correlations and deduce that they are indistinguishable from their correlograms alone. If \(Y_{t}=(1+\beta B) \varepsilon_{t}\) in terms of the backshift operator \(B\), show that \(\varepsilon_{t}\) may be expressed as a linear combination of \(Y_{t}, Y_{t-1}, \ldots\) in which the infinite past has no effect only if \(|\beta|<1\). The ARMA process \(a(B) Y_{t}=b(B) \varepsilon_{t}\) is said to be invertible if the zeros of the polynomial \(b(z)\) all lie outside the unit disk. Show that the MA(1) process is invertible only if \(|\beta|<1\) Compare this with the condition for stationarity of the AR(1) model. Discuss.

Consider two binary random variables with local characteristics $$ \begin{aligned} &\operatorname{Pr}\left(Y_{1}=1 \mid Y_{2}=0\right)=\operatorname{Pr}\left(Y_{1}=0 \mid Y_{2}=1\right)=1 \\ &\operatorname{Pr}\left(Y_{2}=0 \mid Y_{1}=0\right)=\operatorname{Pr}\left(Y_{2}=1 \mid Y_{1}=1\right)=1 \end{aligned} $$ Show that these do not determine a joint density for \(\left(Y_{1}, Y_{2}\right) .\) Is the positivity condition satisfied?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free