Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let \(Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) be independent exponential variables with hazard \(\lambda\) subject to Type I censoring at time \(c\). Show that the observed information for \(\lambda\) is \(D / \lambda^{2}\), where \(D\) is the number of the \(Y_{j}\) that are uncensored, and deduce that the expected information is \(i(\lambda \mid c)=n\\{1-\exp (-\lambda c)\\} / \lambda^{2}\) conditional on \(c\) Now suppose that the censoring time \(c\) is a realization of a random variable \(C\), whose density is gamma with index \(v\) and parameter \(\lambda \alpha\) : $$ f(c)=\frac{(\lambda \alpha)^{v} c^{v-1}}{\Gamma(v)} \exp (-c \lambda \alpha), \quad c>0, \alpha, v>0 $$ Show that the expected information for \(\lambda\) after averaging over \(C\) is $$ i(\lambda)=n\left\\{1-(1+1 / \alpha)^{-v}\right\\} / \lambda^{2} $$ Consider what happens when (i) \(\alpha \rightarrow 0\), (ii) \(\alpha \rightarrow \infty\), (iii) \(\alpha=1, v=1\), (iv) \(v \rightarrow \infty\) but \(\mu=v / \alpha\) is held fixed. In each case explain qualitatively the behaviour of \(i(\lambda)\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The expected information for \( \lambda \) is \( \frac{n\{1-(1+1/\alpha)^{-v}\}}{\lambda^{2}} \), reflecting mix of uncensored events and censoring.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Type I Censoring

Type I censoring occurs when observations are cut off at a certain time point, resulting in some complete and some censored observations. Here, if the event occurs before time \( c \), we observe it, otherwise, it is censored.
02

Derive Observed Information

For an exponential distribution, the likelihood function for censored data is a combination of the likelihoods for the uncensored and censored data. The observed information for \( \lambda \) is calculated using the second derivative of the log-likelihood function with respect to \( \lambda \). For uncensored, \( Y_j < c \), the contribution per observation to the log-likelihood is \( -\lambda Y_j + \log \lambda \). For censored, \( Y_j = c \), it is \( -\lambda c \). Deriving these gives that the observed information is \[ I_O(\lambda) = \frac{D}{\lambda^2} \] where \( D \) is the number of uncensored observations \( D \).
03

Calculate Expected Information Conditional on \( c \)

Given that a proportion of the observations will be uncensored and a proportion observed, observed minus the censoring, the expected information is the expected value of the observed information over the randomness induced by censoring. This gives: \[ i(\lambda \mid c)=n\{1-exp(-\lambda c)\} / \lambda^{2} \] This result reflects the fact that we're weighting only the contribution of uncensored observations.
04

Introduce Gamma Distributed Censoring Time

The censoring time \( c \) is assumed to follow a gamma distribution, which is defined by the formula given for \( f(c) \). Gamma distribution allows \( c \) to be variable, characterized by the shape \( v \) and scale \( \lambda \alpha \) parameters.
05

Compute Expected Information Averaging over \( C \)

To find the expectation over \( C \), integrate the conditional expected information over \( c \), weighted by the gamma density:\[ i(\lambda) = \int_{0}^{\infty} i(\lambda \mid c) f(c) \, dc = n \left\{ 1 - \left(1 + \frac{1}{\alpha}\right)^{-v} \right\} / \lambda^{2} \] This calculation accounts for the average effect of variable censoring times on the information about \( \lambda \).
06

Analyze Special Cases

Analysis of the given cases involves considering the limits and properties of the expected information formula:1. \( \alpha \rightarrow 0 \): Censoring almost never happens, so information equals \( n/\lambda^2 \).2. \( \alpha \rightarrow \infty \): Censoring happens immediately, giving no information, \( i(\lambda) = 0 \).3. \( \alpha = 1, v = 1 \): Results in a moderate level of censoring; use the formula directly.4. \( v \rightarrow \infty \) while \( \mu = v/\alpha\): Information reflects a balance, with proportion \( \mu/(1+\mu) \) of censoring influencing \( i(\lambda) \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Type I Censoring
Type I Censoring is a statistical technique used when dealing with incomplete data. Imagine conducting a study measuring time until an event occurs. **Type I Censoring** occurs when the observation period ends at a predefined time.
If the event hasn't occurred by this time, the data is considered censored.
This approach is useful for controlling study duration or when resources are limited. This censoring splits data points into:
  • **Uncensored observations** - where the event occurred before the cut-off time.
  • **Censored observations** - the event did not occur before the cut-off.
Understanding when and how Type I Censoring occurs helps in analyzing censored data correctly and enhances decision-making regarding parameter estimation.
Observed Information
In statistical analysis, **Observed Information** is crucial for estimating parameters like the rate in exponential distributions. Observed information indicates how much data support our parameter estimates using actual observations. When dealing with censored data, this involves distinguishing between censored and uncensored data to refine our parameter estimation.
Here, the exponential distribution's properties simplify calculations using the log-likelihood function. For every uncensored observation, the data's contribution is calculated by looking at \(-\lambda Y_j + \log \lambda\), while censored observations contribute \(-\lambda c\).
The second derivative of this log-likelihood function with respect to \(\lambda\), evaluated at the estimated value, provides the observed information.
For Type I Censoring, it simplifies to:\[I_O(\lambda) = \frac{D}{\lambda^2}\]where \(D\) is the number of uncensored data points. This approach provides a measure of precision for our \(\lambda\) estimate, relying solely on the observed data that's not censored.
Gamma Distribution
The **Gamma Distribution** is versatile and extremely useful for modeling wait times and event counts, which perfectly aligns with studying censoring time. It's expressed with two parameters: the shape \(v\) and the rate \(\lambda \alpha\).
This distribution is employed when the censoring time isn't fixed but follows a probability distribution itself. If censoring occurs according to a gamma distribution, the statistical analysis incorporates the variability
across possible censoring times rather than a single cut-off point. The density function for gamma distribution is given by:\[f(c)=\frac{(\lambda \alpha)^{v} c^{v-1}}{\Gamma(v)} \exp (-c \lambda \alpha), \quad c>0, \alpha, v>0\]This function describes how likely different durations up to a particular time are, providing more nuance in evaluating expected information in the presence of natural variation.
Expected Information
**Expected Information** is a key metric in statistical inference, providing insight into how much uncertainty is reduced after making observations, even under a random censoring scenario. When censoring is not fixed, but a random variable with known distribution, expected information becomes the average information gained over all possible censoring scenarios.
For exponential distributions with gamma-distributed censoring, expected information is calculated by integrating observed information over the probability distribution of censoring times.
This results in the equation:\[i(\lambda) = n\left\{1-(1+1 / \alpha)^{-v}\right\} / \lambda^{2}\]This equation highlights how changes in gamma distribution parameters affect the information gained. For example, as \(\alpha\) approaches zero, most observation time occurs.
Therefore, information approaches its maximum value of \(n/\lambda^2\). Conversely, if \(\alpha\) increases indefinitely, censoring occurs immediately, reflecting in zero information. Expected information findings thus guide evaluating parameter precision in varying censor contexts.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show that the geometric density $$ f(y ; \pi)=\pi(1-\pi)^{y}, \quad y=0,1, \ldots, 0<\pi<1 $$ is an exponential family, and give its cumulant-generating function. Show that \(S=Y_{1}+\cdots+Y_{n}\) has negative binomial density $$ \left(\begin{array}{c} n+s-1 \\ n-1 \end{array}\right) \pi^{n}(1-\pi)^{s}, \quad s=0,1, \ldots $$ and that this is also an exponential family.

Show that \(\sum s\left(Y_{j}\right)\) is minimal sufficient for the parameter \(\omega\) of an exponential family of order \(p\) in a minimal representation.

Let \(X_{1}, \ldots, X_{n}\) be an exponential random sample with density \(\lambda \exp (-\lambda x), x>0, \lambda>0\) For simplicity suppose that \(n=m r\). Let \(Y_{1}\) be the total time at risk from time zero to the \(r\) th failure, \(Y_{2}\) be the total time at risk between the \(r\) th and the \(2 r\) th failure, \(Y_{3}\) the total time at risk between the \(2 r\) th and \(3 r\) th failures, and so forth. (a) Let \(X_{(1)} \leq X_{(2)} \leq \cdots \leq X_{(n)}\) be the ordered values of the \(X_{j}\). Show that the joint density of the order statistics is $$ f_{X_{(1)}, \ldots, X_{(n)}}\left(x_{1}, \ldots, x_{n}\right)=n ! f\left(x_{1}\right) f\left(x_{2}\right) \cdots f\left(x_{n}\right), \quad x_{1}

Suppose \(Y=\tau \varepsilon\), where \(\tau \in \mathbb{R}_{+}\)and \(\varepsilon\) is a random variable with known density \(f\). Show that this scale model is a group transformation model with free action \(g_{\tau}(y)=\tau y\). Show that \(s_{1}(Y)=\bar{Y}\) and \(s_{2}(Y)=\left(\sum Y_{j}^{2}\right)^{1 / 2}\) are equivariant and find the corresponding maximal invariants. Sketch the orbits when \(n=2\).

Show that the multivariate normal distribution \(N_{p}(\mu, \Omega)\) is a group transformation model under the map \(Y \mapsto a+B Y\), where \(a\) is a \(p \times 1\) vector and \(B\) an invertible \(p \times p\) matrix. Given a random sample \(Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) from this distribution, show that $$ \bar{Y}=n^{-1} \sum_{j=1}^{n} Y_{j}, \quad \sum_{j=1}^{n}\left(Y_{j}-\bar{Y}\right)\left(Y_{j}-\bar{Y}\right)^{\mathrm{T}} $$ is a minimal sufficient statistic for \(\mu\) and \(\Omega\), and give equivariant estimators of them. Use these estimators to find the maximal invariant.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free