Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In an experiment to assess the effectiveness of a treatment to reduce blood pressure in heart patients, \(n\) independent pairs of heart patients are matched according to their sex, weight, smoking history, initial blood pressure, and so forth. Then one of each pair is selected at random and given the treatment. After a set time the blood pressures are again recorded, and it is desired to assess whether the treatment had any effect. A simple model for this is that the \(j\) th pair of final measurements, \(\left(Y_{j 1}, Y_{j 2}\right)\) is two independent normal variables with means \(\mu_{j}\) and \(\mu_{j}+\beta\), and variances \(\sigma^{2}\). It is desired to assess whether \(\beta=0\) or not. One approach is a \(t\) confidence interval based on \(Z_{j}=Y_{j 2}-Y_{j 1} .\) Explain this, and give the degrees of freedom for the \(t\) statistic. Show that the likelihood ratio statistic for \(\beta=0\) is equivalent to \(\bar{Z}^{2} / \sum\left(Z_{j}-\bar{Z}\right)^{2}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The \( t \)-statistic uses \( n-1 \) degrees of freedom, and the likelihood ratio statistic is \( \frac{\bar{Z}^2}{\sum(Z_j - \bar{Z})^2} \).

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Problem

The goal is to determine whether the treatment has an effect, i.e., if \( \beta eq 0 \), by analyzing the differences in post-treatment blood pressure measurements, \( Z_j = Y_{j2} - Y_{j1} \). The challenge is to ascertain if these differences are statistically significant or could just occur by random chance.
02

Formulating Hypothesis

We will perform a hypothesis test with the null hypothesis \( H_0: \beta = 0 \) against the alternative hypothesis \( H_a: \beta eq 0 \). \( \beta = 0 \) implies no difference between treated and untreated patients.
03

Constructing the Test Statistic

We define the sample mean \( \bar{Z} = \frac{1}{n}\sum Z_j \) and sample variance \( S^2 = \frac{1}{n-1} \sum (Z_j - \bar{Z})^2 \). The test statistic is \( t = \frac{\bar{Z} \sqrt{n}}{S} \), which follows a Student's t-distribution if \( \beta = 0 \).
04

Determining Degrees of Freedom

Since we have independent paired observations, each pair gives one degree of freedom. Hence, the degrees of freedom for the \( t \)-statistic is \( n-1 \), where \( n \) is the number of pairs.
05

Likelihood Ratio Statistic Equivalence

We use the likelihood ratio test statistic which is an alternative approach. The likelihood under \( \beta = 0 \) is compared with \( \beta eq 0 \). It can be shown that the likelihood ratio statistic is equivalent to \( \frac{\bar{Z}^2}{\sum(Z_j - \bar{Z})^2} \). This ratio measures the strength of \( \bar{Z} \) relative to the variance of \( Z_j \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

t-confidence interval
A t-confidence interval helps us understand the range in which we expect the true parameter of interest, like a difference in means, to fall. In this experiment, we're examining whether the treatment impacts blood pressure, represented by the parameter \( \beta \).
The confidence interval is constructed from the sample mean differences \( \bar{Z} \) and their standard deviation. It uses the formula:
  • \( \bar{Z} \pm t \times \frac{S}{\sqrt{n}} \)
  • Where \( t \) is the critical value from the t-distribution for \( n-1 \) degrees of freedom
This interval provides us with a range of plausible values for \( \beta \). If zero falls within this interval, it suggests that the treatment might not have an effect.
paired sample design
A paired sample design is used when each subject serves as their own control. This method allows for an effective comparison by eliminating variability due to inter-subject differences.
In this case, each heart patient has a matching counterpart. One from the pair receives treatment, while the other does not. The differences in their outcomes are then analyzed. Such a design reduces noise because:
  • It controls for individual variability like sex, weight, and smoking history.
  • This design focuses solely on the treatment effect \( \beta \).
This paired approach strengthens internal validity and increases the power of the statistical test.
likelihood ratio test
The likelihood ratio test is used to compare statistical models with and without a specific parameter, like \( \beta = 0 \) in this exercise. The goal is to determine if the parameter significantly improves the model.
To apply this test:
  • The null model assumes \( \beta = 0 \).
  • The alternative model assumes \( \beta eq 0 \).
The test statistic, \( \frac{\bar{Z}^2}{\sum(Z_j - \bar{Z})^2} \), measures the strength of the observed mean difference relative to variability. A higher value means \( \bar{Z} \) isn't likely due to chance, suggesting the treatment possibly has an effect.
degrees of freedom
Degrees of freedom (df) represent the number of values in the final calculation of a statistic that are free to vary. In hypothesis testing, they ensure that our statistical tests accurately reflect the variability in the data.
In paired samples, each patient pair contributes one piece of independent information. Thus, for \( n \) pairs:
  • The formula is \( n-1 \) for degrees of freedom.
  • This affects the critical value from the Student's t-distribution used in hypothesis testing.
Understanding df is crucial because it influences both the width of confidence intervals and the significance level of your test results.
Student's t-distribution
Student's t-distribution is essential for analyzing data with small sample sizes, especially when the population standard deviation is unknown. It is bell-shaped like the normal distribution but has thicker tails, which reflect more uncertainty.
Key features include:
  • Dependence on degrees of freedom: As df increases, it approaches the normal distribution.
  • Used to derive critical values for t-tests and confidence intervals.
In this experiment, the t-distribution helps us determine if the observed difference in \( \bar{Z} \) is significant, indicating a potential treatment effect on blood pressure. It's a crucial tool when working with smaller \( n \) due to increased variability.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In a normal linear model through the origin, independent observations \(Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) are such that \(Y_{j} \sim N\left(\beta x_{j}, \sigma^{2}\right)\). Show that the log likelihood for a sample \(y_{1}, \ldots, y_{n}\) is $$ \ell\left(\beta, \sigma^{2}\right)=-\frac{n}{2} \log \left(2 \pi \sigma^{2}\right)-\frac{1}{2 \sigma^{2}} \sum_{j=1}^{n}\left(y_{j}-\beta x_{j}\right)^{2} $$ Deduce that the likelihood equations are equivalent to \(\sum x_{j}\left(y_{j}-\widehat{\beta} x_{j}\right)=0\) and \(\hat{\sigma}^{2}=\) \(n^{-1} \sum\left(y_{j}-\widehat{\beta} x_{j}\right)^{2}\), and hence find the maximum likelihood estimates \(\widehat{\beta}\) and \(\widehat{\sigma}^{2}\) for data with \(x=(1,2,3,4,5)\) and \(y=(2.81,5.48,7.11,8.69,11.28)\) Show that the observed information matrix evaluated at the maximum likelihood estimates is diagonal and use it to obtain approximate \(95 \%\) confidence intervals for the parameters. Plot the data and your fitted line \(y=\widehat{\beta} x\). Say whether you think the model is correct, with reasons. Discuss the adequacy of the normal approximations in this example.

A family has two children \(A\) and \(B .\) Child \(A\) catches an infectious disease \(\mathcal{D}\) which is so rare that the probability that \(B\) catches it other than from \(A\) can be ignored. Child \(A\) is infectious for a time \(U\) having probability density function \(\alpha e^{-\alpha u}, u \geq 0\), and in any small interval of time \([t, t+\delta t]\) in \([0, U), B\) will catch \(\mathcal{D}\) from \(A\) with probability \(\beta \delta t+o(\delta t)\) where \(\alpha, \beta>0 .\) Calculate the probability \(\rho\) that \(B\) does catch \(\mathcal{D} .\) Show that, in a family where \(B\) is actually infected, the density function of the time to infection is \(\gamma e^{-\gamma t}, t \geq 0\) where \(\gamma=\alpha+\beta\) An epidemiologist observes \(n\) independent similar families, in \(r\) of which the second child catches \(\mathcal{D}\) from the first, at times \(t_{1}, \ldots, t_{r} .\) Write down the likelihood of the data as the product of the probability of observing \(r\) and the likelihood of the fixed sample \(t_{1}, \ldots, t_{r}\). Find the maximum likelihood estimators \(\widehat{\rho}\) and \(\widehat{\gamma}\) of \(\rho\) and \(\gamma\), and the asymptotic variance of \(\widehat{\gamma}\)

Find the expected information for \(\theta\) based on a random sample \(Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) from the geometric density $$ f(y ; \theta)=\theta(1-\theta)^{y-1}, \quad y=1,2,3, \ldots, 0<\theta<1 $$ A statistician has a choice between observing random samples from the Bernoulli or geometric densities with the same \(\theta\). Which will give the more precise inference on \(\theta ?\)

Verify that the likelihood for \(f(y ; \lambda)=\lambda \exp (-\lambda y), y, \lambda>0\), is invariant to the reparametrization \(\psi=1 / \lambda .\)

\(Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) are independent normal random variables with unit variances and means \(\mathrm{E}\left(Y_{j}\right)=\beta x_{j}\), where the \(x_{j}\) are known quantities in \((0,1]\) and \(\beta\) is an unknown parameter. Show that \(\ell(\beta) \equiv-\frac{1}{2} \sum\left(y_{j}-x_{j} \beta\right)^{2}\) and find the expected information \(I(\beta)\) for \(\beta\) Suppose that \(n=10\) and that an experiment to estimate \(\beta\) is to be designed by choosing the \(x_{j}\) appropriately. Show that \(I(\beta)\) is maximized when all the \(x_{j}\) equal \(1 .\) Is this design sensible if there is any possibility that \(\mathrm{E}\left(Y_{j}\right)=\alpha+\beta x_{j}\), with \(\alpha\) unknown?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free