Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Conditional on \(M=m, Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) is a random sample from the \(N\left(m, \sigma^{2}\right)\) distribution. Find the unconditional joint distribution of \(Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n}\) when \(M\) has the \(N\left(\mu, \tau^{2}\right)\) distribution. Use induction to show that the covariance matrix \(\Omega\) has determinant \(\sigma^{2 n-2}\left(\sigma^{2}+n \tau^{2}\right)\), and show that \(\Omega^{-1}\) has diagonal elements \(\left\\{\sigma^{2}+(n-1) \tau^{2}\right) /\left\\{\sigma^{2}\left(\sigma^{2}+n \tau^{2}\right)\right\\}\) and offdiagonal elements \(-\tau^{2} /\left\\{\sigma^{2}\left(\sigma^{2}+n \tau^{2}\right)\right\\}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The unconditional joint distribution is multivariate normal with covariance matrix \( \Omega = \sigma^2 I_n + \tau^2 \mathbf{1}\mathbf{1}^T \). The determinant of \( \Omega \) is \( \sigma^{2n-2}( \sigma^2 + n \tau^2) \), and \( \Omega^{-1} \) has described diagonal and off-diagonal elements.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Conditional Distribution

Given that conditional on \( M = m \), the variables \( Y_1, Y_2, \ldots, Y_n \) are independent and identically distributed as \( N(m, \sigma^2) \), this implies that individually, \( Y_i | M = m \sim N(m, \sigma^2) \) for each \( i \).
02

Define the Joint Distribution Conditioning on M

Conditional on \( M = m \), the joint distribution of \( Y_1, Y_2, \ldots, Y_n \) is a multivariate normal distribution. This can be expressed as \( (Y_1, Y_2, \ldots, Y_n | M = m) \sim N(m \mathbf{1}, \sigma^2 I_n) \) where \( \mathbf{1} \) is a vector of ones and \( I_n \) is the \( n \times n \) identity matrix.
03

Apply the Law of Total Probability

To find the unconditional distribution, integrate out \( M \) using the law of total probability: \[ P(Y_1, \ldots, Y_n) = \int P(Y_1, \ldots, Y_n | M = m) P(M = m) \, dm \]Since \( M \sim N(\mu, \tau^2) \), plug in the gaussian PDFs to get the joint distribution.
04

Find the Covariance Matrix Ω

The covariance matrix \( \Omega \) of the unconditional joint distribution can be derived by considering both variances from the \( M \) and \( Y_i | M \) separately. This results in: \[ \Omega = \sigma^2 I_n + \tau^2 \mathbf{1} \mathbf{1}^T \] where \( I_n \) is the identity matrix and \( \mathbf{1} \mathbf{1}^T \) is a matrix of all 1s.
05

Calculate the Determinant of Ou00eb

The determinant of the covariance matrix \( \Omega \) can be calculated by treating it as a sum of an identity matrix and a rank-1 update. Using the matrix determinant lemma:\[ \det(\Omega) = (\sigma^2)^{n-1}(\sigma^2 + n\tau^2) \]By seeing it as an application of the identity plus outer product matrix.
06

Deriving the Inverse of Ω

Using the Woodbury matrix identity, we derive the inverse of \( \Omega \). The key points are:- Diagonal Elements: \( \frac{\sigma^2 + (n-1) \tau^2}{\sigma^2(\sigma^2 + n\tau^2)} \)- Off-diagonal Elements: \(-\frac{\tau^2}{\sigma^2(\sigma^2 + n\tau^2)} \)This form ensures the product \( \Omega \Omega^{-1} \) is the identity.
07

Prove by Induction

To confirm the determinant calculation, apply induction on \( n \). Base case \( n=1 \) is trivially \( \sigma^2 + \tau^2 \). For \( n \to n+1 \), assume the formula holds and show that adding an additional variable maintains the determinant structure due to the matrix operations involved.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Covariance Matrix
One of the fundamental concepts in understanding the multivariate normal distribution is the covariance matrix, denoted as \( \Omega \) in our case. A covariance matrix not only represents the variance of multiple variables but also the covariance between each pair. For a set of variables \( Y_1, Y_2, \ldots, Y_n \), the covariance matrix provides a comprehensive look at how each pair of these variables co-vary.
Understanding \( \Omega \) involves considering both the individual variance \( \sigma^2 \) from the distribution of each variable \( Y_i \) given \( M \), and the variance \( \tau^2 \) from the distribution of \( M \) itself. When combined using matrix operations, this results in a structure:\[ \Omega = \sigma^2 I_n + \tau^2 \mathbf{1} \mathbf{1}^T \]
Here, \( \sigma^2 I_n \) represents the diagonal matrix with \( \sigma^2 \) on its diagonal, indicating each variable \( Y_i \)'s variance independently, while \( \tau^2 \mathbf{1} \mathbf{1}^T \) captures the shared variance across the variables due to \( M \).
This matrix is crucial for wrapping up how multivariate distributions differ from simply stacking single-variable distributions together.
Determinant
In understanding the multivariate normal distribution, the determinant of the covariance matrix \( \Omega \) provides key insights into the dataset's spread and volume. The determinant essentially tells us about the 'size' of the distribution formed by \( Y_1, Y_2, \ldots, Y_n \).
With the matrix \( \Omega = \sigma^2 I_n + \tau^2 \mathbf{1} \mathbf{1}^T \), its determinant is calculated using a special lemma for matrix determinants, known as the matrix determinant lemma. This yields:
\[ \det(\Omega) = (\sigma^2)^{n-1}(\sigma^2 + n\tau^2) \]
This result demonstrates the cumulative effect of the variances and covariances on the overall structure of the data's distribution, allowing us to analyze the balance between individual components' variability and their collective consistency. This is foundational in quantifying the uncertainty a dataset contains.
Law of Total Probability
The law of total probability is a cornerstone concept when working with conditional probabilities in statistics. It allows us to integrate out a variable and find an unconditional distribution based on conditional structures.
In our exercise, we use the law of total probability to find the unconditional joint distribution of \( Y_1, \ldots, Y_n \). This is accomplished by considering all possible values of \( M \), weighting each with its probability, and integrating across these weighted possibilities. Mathematically, this is expressed as:
\[ P(Y_1, \ldots, Y_n) = \int P(Y_1, \ldots, Y_n | M = m) P(M = m) \, dm \]
Filling in with Gaussian functions, we achieve a seamless blend of conditional and unconditional scenarios, especially when \( M \) has a normal distribution. This process is crucial in statistical methodology as it establishes a global understanding of how data behaves beyond the conditions previously set.
Induction in Statistics
Induction is a powerful technique in mathematics and statistics for proving statements about an infinite sequence of cases. In this context, it is used to verify the formula for the determinant of the covariance matrix \( \Omega \).
To apply induction, we first verify the base case when \( n=1 \) to see that the expression trivially holds as \( \sigma^2 + \tau^2 \). Next, in the induction step, we assume our formula to be true for some \( n \) and demonstrate it holds for \( n+1 \).
This step involves matrix operations, showing that extending \( \) by one also extends the matrix dimensions and hence elucidates how the determinant structure remains constant under incremental increase. Each step relies on understanding how covariance matrices scale with the addition of data points, giving us confidence in the construction of complex statistical models.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Verify that if there is a non-zero vector \(a\) such that \(\operatorname{var}\left(a^{\mathrm{T}} Y\right)=0\), either some \(Y_{r}\) takes a single value with probability one or \(Y_{r}=\sum_{s \neq r} b_{s} Y_{s}\), for some \(r, b_{s}\) not all equal to zero.

Let \(R_{1}, R_{2}\) be independent binomial random variables with probabilities \(\pi_{1}, \pi_{2}\) and denominators \(m_{1}, m_{2}\), and let \(P_{i}=R_{i} / m_{i} .\) It is desired to test if \(\pi_{1}=\pi_{2}\). Let \(\widehat{\pi}=\left(m_{1} P_{1}+m_{2} P_{2}\right) /\left(m_{1}+m_{2}\right) .\) Show that when \(\pi_{1}=\pi_{2}\), the statistic $$ Z=\frac{P_{1}-P_{2}}{\sqrt{\widehat{\pi}(1-\hat{\pi})\left(1 / m_{1}+1 / m_{2}\right)}} \stackrel{D}{\longrightarrow} N(0,1) $$ when \(m_{1}, m_{2} \rightarrow \infty\) in such a way that \(m_{1} / m_{2} \rightarrow \xi\) for \(0<\xi<1\). Now consider a \(2 \times 2\) table formed using two independent binomial variables and having entries \(R_{i}, S_{i}\) where \(R_{i}+S_{i}=m_{i}, R_{i} / m_{i}=P_{i}\), for \(i=1,2\). Show that if \(\pi_{1}=\pi_{2}\) and \(m_{1}, m_{2} \rightarrow \infty\), then $$ X^{2}=\left(n_{1}+n_{2}\right)\left(R_{1} S_{2}-R_{2} S_{1}\right)^{2} /\left\\{n_{1} n_{2}\left(R_{1}+R_{2}\right)\left(S_{1}+S_{2}\right)\right\\} \stackrel{D}{\longrightarrow} \chi_{1}^{2} $$ Two batches of trees were planted in a park: 250 were obtained from nursery \(A\) and 250 from nursery \(B\). Subsequently 41 and 64 trees from the two groups die. Do trees from the two nurseries have the same survival probabilities? Are the assumptions you make reasonable?

A binomial variable \(R\) has mean \(m \pi\) and variance \(m \pi(1-\pi) .\) Find the variance function of \(Y=R / m\), and hence obtain the variance-stabilizing transform for \(R\).

If \(Z \sim N(0,1)\), derive the density of \(Y=Z^{2}\). Although \(Y\) is determined by \(Z\), show they are uncorrelated.

Suppose \(Y \sim N_{p}(\mu, \Omega)\) and \(a\) and \(b\) are \(p \times 1\) vectors of constants. Find the distribution of \(X_{1}=a^{\mathrm{T}} Y\) conditional on \(X_{2}=b^{\mathrm{T}} Y=x_{2} .\) Under what circumstances does this not depend on \(x_{2} ?\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free