Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Let \(Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n} \stackrel{\mathrm{iid}}{\sim} N\left(\mu, \sigma^{2}\right)\) with \(\sigma^{2}\) known. Show that \(\left(Y_{1}-\bar{Y}, \ldots, Y_{n}-\bar{Y}\right)\) is distribution constant, and deduce that \(\bar{Y}\) and \(\sum\left(Y_{j}-\bar{Y}\right)^{2}\) are independent.

Short Answer

Expert verified
\(\bar{Y}\) and \(\sum (Y_j - \bar{Y})^2\) are independent due to orthogonal transformations.

Step by step solution

01

Express Individual Deviations from the Mean

Start by expressing the deviations of each sample from the sample mean \( \bar{Y} = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} Y_i \). So each deviation is: \( Y_i - \bar{Y} \). These deviations essentially measure how far each data point is from their average.
02

Understand the Distribution of Deviations

Note that the sum of the deviations from the mean is zero:\[ \sum_{i=1}^{n} (Y_i - \bar{Y}) = \sum_{i=1}^{n} Y_i - n \bar{Y} = n\bar{Y} - n\bar{Y} = 0. \] This property indicates that once the mean \( \bar{Y} \) is known, the deviations \( Y_1 - \bar{Y}, \ldots, Y_n - \bar{Y} \) are not dependent on \( \mu \), and thus their distribution is centered around zero, suggesting a constant distribution characteristic.
03

Analyze the Independence of \( \bar{Y} \)

The sample mean \( \bar{Y} \) is the average of the normally distributed i.i.d variables, hence \( \bar{Y} \sim N(\mu, \sigma^2/n) \). Since \( \bar{Y} \) is essentially the component in the deviations \( Y_i - \bar{Y} \) whose sum is zero, it indicates independence from any variation in \( \sum (Y_i - \bar{Y})^2 \).
04

Deduce Independence using Orthogonal Transformation

Transform to orthogonal coordinates, where the first coordinate is \( \bar{Y} \) capturing total information about the mean, and remaining \( n-1 \) coordinates as \( Z_i = Y_i - \bar{Y} \). These coordinates are orthogonal transformations, separating the mean calculation from sum of squares calculation \( \sum (Y_i - \bar{Y})^2 \). Such transformations ensure that \( \bar{Y} \) and \( \sum (Y_i - \bar{Y})^2 \) are independent since they describe independent modes of variance in the data.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Deviation from the Mean
In a set of data, deviation from the mean helps us to understand how individual data points differ from the average value. For a group of random variables that are independent and identically distributed (i.i.d) with a normal distribution, like \(Y_1, Y_2, \ldots, Y_n\), we often look at each one’s deviation: \(Y_i - \bar{Y}\). This expression illustrates how far each \(Y_i\) is from the sample mean \(\bar{Y}\).Calculating deviations involves these steps:
  • First, find the sample mean \(\bar{Y} = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} Y_i\).
  • Then, subtract \(\bar{Y}\) from each individual value \(Y_i\) to get \(Y_i - \bar{Y}\).
This computation helps in identifying if the data is spread out or clustered closely around the mean.An important property of these deviations is that their sum equals zero: \(\sum_{i=1}^{n} (Y_i - \bar{Y}) = 0\). This balance indicates that the deviations are symmetrically dispersed about the mean, meaning there are equal amounts of data above and below it.
Orthogonal Transformation
Orthogonal transformation is a technique used in statistics to simplify complex data into uncorrelated components. In our given scenario involving normal distributions, orthogonal transformations help us to decompose the data into the sample mean and deviations from the mean.Here's how it works:
  • First, the sample mean \(\bar{Y}\) acts as an axis representing the average value of the distributions.
  • Next, each deviation \(Y_i - \bar{Y}\) forms new axes (coordinates), which are "orthogonal" to the mean. This implies they are independent of it.
By organizing our data using such transformations, each new coordinate, or axis, represents a unique and separate source of variability. As a result, the transformations simplify into a form where the mean and the sum of squares of deviations \(\sum (Y_i - \bar{Y})^2\) are statistically independent.This independence is crucial as it enables separate analysis of the central tendency and the spread (or variance) of the data without them influencing each other.
Sample Mean
The sample mean, represented as \(\bar{Y}\), is a core concept in statistics. When dealing with random variables that are i.i.d and normally distributed, the sample mean gives us a concise measure of the average value for this set.To calculate it, follow these steps:
  • Add up all the values from your sample data: \(Y_1 + Y_2 + \ldots + Y_n\).
  • Divide by the number of data points \(n\) to find the average: \(\bar{Y} = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} Y_i\).
The sample mean is normally distributed itself, with the distribution \(N(\mu, \sigma^2/n)\). This distribution characteristic ensures that as sample size \(n\) increases, the sample mean becomes a more accurate estimate of the population mean \(\mu\).Furthermore, in the orthogonal transformation discussed earlier, \(\bar{Y}\) becomes an independent parameter, separate from the sum of squared deviations. This independence aids significantly in statistical inference, such as hypothesis testing, because it implies that knowledge of \(\bar{Y}\) alone will not provide information about the spread of the data.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A Poisson variable \(Y\) has mean \(\mu\), which is itself a gamma random variable with mean \(\theta\) and shape parameter \(v\). Find the marginal density of \(Y\), and show that \(\operatorname{var}(Y)=\theta+\theta^{2} / v\), and that \(v\) and \(\theta\) are orthogonal. Hence show that \(v\) is orthogonal to \(\beta\) for any model in which \(\theta=\theta\left(x^{\mathrm{T}} \beta\right), x\) being a covariate vector. Is the same true for the model in which \(v=\theta / \kappa\), so that \(\operatorname{var}(Y)=(1+\kappa) \mu ?\) Discuss the implications for inference on \(\beta\) when the variance function is unknown.

$$ \text { Let } Y_{1}, \ldots, Y_{n} \stackrel{\text { iid }}{\sim} N\left(\mu, c^{2} \mu^{2}\right) \text {, with } c \text { known. Show that } \bar{Y} / S \text { is ancillary for } \mu \text {. } $$

Independent pairs of binary observations \(\left(R_{01}, R_{11}\right), \ldots,\left(R_{0 n}, R_{1 n}\right)\) have success probabilities \(\left(e^{\lambda_{j}} /\left(1+e^{\lambda_{j}}\right), e^{\psi+\lambda_{j}} /\left(1+e^{\psi+\lambda_{j}}\right)\right)\), for \(j=1, \ldots, n\) (a) Show that the maximum likelihood estimator of \(\psi\) based on the conditional likelihood is \(\widehat{\psi}_{\mathrm{c}}=\log \left(R^{01} / R^{10}\right)\), where \(R^{01}\) and \(R^{10}\) are respectively the numbers of \((0,1)\) and \((1,0)\) pairs. Does \(\widehat{\psi}_{\mathrm{c}}\) tend to \(\psi\) as \(n \rightarrow \infty\) ? (b) Write down the unconditional likelihood for \(\psi\) and \(\lambda\), and show that the likelihood equations are equivalent to $$ \begin{aligned} &r_{0 j}+r_{1 j}=\frac{e^{\hat{\lambda}_{j}}}{1+e^{\hat{\lambda}_{j}}}+\frac{e^{\hat{\lambda}_{j}+\widehat{\psi}}}{1+e^{\hat{\lambda}_{j}+\hat{\psi}}}, \quad j=1, \ldots, n \\ &\sum_{j=1}^{n} r_{1 j}=\sum_{j=1}^{n} \frac{e^{\hat{\lambda}_{j}+\hat{\psi}}}{1+e^{\hat{\lambda}_{j}+\widehat{\psi}}} \end{aligned} $$

Let \(X\) and \(Y\) be independent exponential variables with means \(\gamma^{-1}\) and \((\gamma \psi)^{-1}\). Show that the parameter \(\lambda(\gamma, \psi)\) orthogonal to \(\psi\) is the solution to the equation \(\partial \gamma / \partial \psi=-\gamma /(2 \psi)\), and verify that taking \(\lambda=\gamma / \psi^{-1 / 2}\) yields an orthogonal parametrization. Investigate how this solution changes when \(X\) and \(Y\) are subject to Type I censoring at \(c\).

Let \(Y\) and \(X\) be independent exponential variables with means \(1 /(\lambda+\psi)\) and \(1 / \lambda\). Find the distribution of \(Y\) given \(X+Y\) and show that when \(\psi=0\) it has mean \(s / 2\) and variance \(s^{2} / 12 .\) Construct an exact conditional test of the hypothesis \(\mathrm{E}(Y)=\mathrm{E}(X)\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free